Logpoint vs SmartEvent Event Management comparison

Logpoint and Check Point Software Technologies are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Logpoint is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3, while Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #58 with an average rating of 5.5. Logpoint holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Check Point Software Technologies’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Logpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users who would recommend it.

Logpoint

Read 24 Logpoint reviews

4,412 Views
2,427 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SmartEvent Event Management

Read 2 SmartEvent Event Management reviews

822 Views
806 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Logpoint

SmartEvent Event Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Logpoint and SmartEvent Event Management compete in the event management category. Based on user feedback, SmartEvent Event Management appears superior due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Logpoint offers real-time monitoring, easy log analysis, and affordability. SmartEvent Event Management provides advanced analytics, integrated threat intelligence, and extensive functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Logpoint could improve integration capabilities, reporting tools, and scalability. SmartEvent Event Management needs enhancements in scalability, initial setup simplicity, and customer feedback mechanisms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. SmartEvent Event Management's deployment is more complex but supported by detailed documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Logpoint is praised for competitive setup costs and satisfactory ROI. SmartEvent Event Management is seen as more costly initially but provides robust features and better long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Logpoint vs. SmartEvent Event Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. SmartEvent Event Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logpoint

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (30th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (15th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (19th)

SmartEvent Event Management

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

58th

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Logpoint is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartEvent Event Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Logpoint	1.2%
SmartEvent Event Management	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Rifat Hasan

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.

Read full review

Adhi Wahyu

Network Engineer at RSUP Dr. Sardjito

Transparent and offers real-time analysis but needs more documentation

The solution provides us with transparency to give us information about what happens in the network. With this information, the administrator can see a lot of things. They can see hacking attempts from the internet that target our servers, and, with that information, they can check the security settings in the server to see if it is strong enough or not, and make sure the servers is safe. They also can see attacks directed to the endpoint. We know which endpoint got infected so we can take action to clean it. The software also has good reporting capabilities. We can create custom reports according to our needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's user interface is quite simple, and the integration is better than other products."

"It is a good cost proposition, and it works extremely well and very fast."

"Log collection, dashboards and reporting are good."

"The product is easy to use."

"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."

"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."

"Technical support is responsive and very friendly."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."

More Logpoint pros

"The capability of real-time analysis of security events is useful."

"SmartEvent Event Management is a solid platform overall, and I would definitely recommend it."

Cons

"Sometimes, the product is not stable."

"Nowadays the trend is going towards the ransomware and the endpoint detection and response. So if they added something for that, that will be very, very good."

"LogPoint is complex and we don't have the skills to maintain use cases or even to extend the use cases."

"The interface needs things like wizards that will assist with creating complex correlation rules."

"My issues with the product are mainly with regard to how it handles collecting logs."

"One of the downsides is it is not a SaaS solution. It must be on-premises."

"I know that they have user behavior analytics, but it's an extra cost for this feature."

"We were missing visuals and graphics. Recently, a new version seems to have come out, and it has a new graphical user interface. When I was integrating it, it was usable, but the GUI needed improvement."

More Logpoint cons

"They should provide easy to access guides or manuals, maybe videos, about how to manage or use the software effectively and efficiently, to maximize its features."

"The only downside I've encountered with SmartEvent Event Management is occasional lag during video calls, especially with a lot of participants."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

"It's getting more expensive, which is one of the reasons we're looking around just to see if there's anything better value."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"Logpoint's pricing is mid-ranged and depends on the number of devices."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogPoint?

I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not contact me. Bangladesh already has a Logpoint distributor. In terms of complianc...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartEvent Event Management?

The product has annual licensing; make sure you really use it well to help you secure the network so you don't waste the license cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartEvent Event Management?

The only downside I've encountered with SmartEvent Event Management ( /categories/event-monitoring ) is occasional lag during video calls, especially with a lot of participants. Although it is not ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SmartEvent Event Management?

Our primary use case involves utilizing SmartEvent Event Management ( /products/smartevent-event-management-reviews ) for video conferencing, file sharing, and integration with other productivity t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 51% of the time

Enterprise SIEM vs SmartEvent Event Management

Compared 49% of the time

More SmartEvent Event Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint

May 2026

Download Logpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

April 2026

Download SmartEvent Event Management product report

Overview

Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.

Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.

What are the most important features of Logpoint?

Easy-to-use dashboard: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Correlation engine: Connects data for in-depth security insights.
Comprehensive log collection: Facilitates extensive data gathering.
Third-party integrations: Connects seamlessly with other tools.
UEBA and SOAR components: Enhance threat response and automation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides significant value for its pricing.
User-friendly interface: Enhances usability with straightforward design.
Compliance navigation: Eases PCI DSS and GDPR compliance.
Quick support service: Provides responsive customer assistance.

Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.

Logpoint

SmartEvent Event Management offers advanced tools for monitoring, analyzing, and managing security events, providing real-time threat detection and simplified incident response.

This platform enhances control over security operations through its robust reporting and analytics capabilities. SmartEvent Event Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring, leading to higher efficiency in security tasks. It helps users stay compliant with regulations and supports real-time threat investigation. With intuitive event scheduling, the software elevates event planning and execution through seamless integration and customization options.

What are the key features of SmartEvent Event Management?

Real-time threat detection: Identify and respond to security threats as they occur
Compliance management: Ensure adherence to necessary regulations
Centralized monitoring: Maintain complete oversight of security events
Event scheduling: Plan and organize events efficiently
Customizable reporting: Tailor reports to meet specific needs
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly connect with other platforms
Performance tracking: Monitor the effectiveness of security measures

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced visibility: Improved control over security operations
Increased efficiency: Streamlined security tasks through automation
Reliable performance: Consistent and dependable operation
Better communication: Effective coordination within teams

In specific industries, SmartEvent Event Management can be implemented to streamline security operations, ensuring real-time threat detection and compliance with industry regulations. Its customization options and integration capabilities make it adaptable for various sectors, enhancing event planning and execution in finance, healthcare, and more.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. SmartEvent Event Management

April 2026

Free Report: Logpoint vs. SmartEvent Event Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Logpoint vs. SmartEvent Event Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logpoint vs. SmartEvent Event Management report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.