Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LM Envision vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LM Envision
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
101st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PRTG Network Monitor
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
102
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of LM Envision is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.4%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Use LM Envision?
Share your opinion
Noman-Saleem - PeerSpot reviewer
Detects suden changes but significant pricing concerns affect the effectiveness of network traffic troubleshooting
We use PRTG Network Monitor for monitoring traffic on interfaces and the behavior of network traffic. If there are sudden changes in traffic or any configuration issues, we can sort them out using PRTG. It's very helpful for troubleshooting and monitoring traffic utilization on our interfaces…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
858,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
35%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...
What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?
The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?
The pricing is in the middle. It's not too high, nor too low, but it's reasonable.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. General Electric 2. Siemens 3. Honeywell 4. Schneider Electric 5. ABB 6. Emerson Electric 7. Rockwell Automation 8. Johnson Controls 9. Mitsubishi Electric 10. Eaton Corporation 11. Danfoss 12. Yokogawa Electric 13. Toshiba Corporation 14. Hitachi 15. Fuji Electric 16. WEG Industries 17. Parker Hannifin 18. SKF 19. Bosch Rexroth 20. Festo 21. Omron Corporation 22. Endress+Hauser 23. Pepperl+Fuchs 24. Yokohama Rubber Company 25. Weidmüller 26. Phoenix Contact 27. Belden Inc. 28. Advantech 29. Beckhoff Automation 30. National Instruments 31. Teledyne Technologies 32. Yaskawa Electric Corporation
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: May 2025.
858,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.