No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Limeade ONE [EOL] vs SharePoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Limeade ONE [EOL]
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SharePoint
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
166
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (1st), Web Content Management (2nd), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user671481 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Architect, Digital Workplace Consultant at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques.
Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques. Expert browser that allows you to quickly find colleagues with proper experience. Ideation that enables internal crowdsourcing and innovation scenarios The…
RK
Software Engineer at Netaji Subhash Engineering College
Centralized document governance has boosted collaboration and made knowledge sharing structured
SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifically when working with multiple sites and document libraries. Another improvement would be search functionalities. While it is good sometimes, it does not always return the most relevant result unless a document is very well-structured and tagged. Also, initial setup and customizations can be time-consuming and may require technical expertise, specifically when configuring workflows or permissions. From a modern development perspective, tighter and more seamless integrations with tools including Power Automate and better support for custom backend integrations through APIs could make it more efficient. Overall, simplifying usability and enhancing search and integration capability would make SharePoint even stronger. One additional area I would appreciate improvement would be performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with a large document library. Sometimes loading or navigating through large datasets can feel quite slow. Another aspect is permissions management. While it is very powerful, it can become complex to manage at scale, specifically when there are multiple levels of access across teams and projects. Improving developer experience would also be beneficial. Making customization, API integrations, and extensions more straightforward would help teams, especially backend developers, leverage SharePoint more efficiently.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have had success with deploying Newsgator's social functionality on top of our SharePoint environment."
"Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"It offers an easy way to store unstructured content (.pdf, .doc, .xls, images) and to tag them with metadata."
"The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes, and there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services."
"It is very stable."
"Our staff found it simpler, as they did not have to work within a classification system."
"I think that SharePoint is the best on the market in terms of stability, quality and capability."
"The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit."
"From my perspective as a developer I would say that the most valuable features are the wide variety of data source connections, completeness of features, and strong query possibilities (customisation, SQL, MDX, macros)."
 

Cons

"Need to improve their mobile / smartphone apps by adding more functionality."
"The OOB user interface should be enhanced to be more user-friendly and responsive."
"Unless you have worked with a SharePoint business analyst, designer or power user, managing individual sites does require training to understand the components of the site settings and content."
"Too many versions being released in a short time period. Too much time being devoted to migration planning."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools."
"It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family."
"Technical support is bad, as the support is for all other Microsoft products."
"Ultimately SharePoint offers less than what you need for more than what you bargained."
"Allow more functionalities for the on-premise version. Do not force the move of content to a non-private cloud."
"It has its limitations. We are unable to use this tool to "archive" data and run queries to generate hindsight information."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is very expensive.​"
"It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month."
"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."
"The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
"The data classification and search elements are cheap."
"The platform has medium pricing."
"We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8925 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer with 51-200 employees
Aug 23, 2013
Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons
At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business80
Midsize Enterprise39
Large Enterprise82
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?
I do not know the difference between the prices of the two solutions; I did not work on this project.
What needs improvement with SharePoint?
SharePoint is a powerful platform, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved, such as user experience. For new users, the interface and navigation can feel quite complex, specifi...
What is your primary use case for SharePoint?
My main use case for SharePoint is storing data, and it has primarily served as our document management and team collaboration platform. I have used it to organize and share documents, manage versi...
 

Also Known As

Social Sites, Sitrion Social Sites
SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BitBurger, Daiichi-Sankyo, ING, Mercer, Merck, NSN, Renault, Stockland, Unisys
Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Find out what your peers are saying about Slack, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2026.
892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.