No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Limeade ONE [EOL] vs Slack Business - Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Limeade ONE [EOL]
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Slack Business - Enterprise
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user671481 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Architect, Digital Workplace Consultant at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques.
Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques. Expert browser that allows you to quickly find colleagues with proper experience. Ideation that enables internal crowdsourcing and innovation scenarios The…
Akhil Viswam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Threaded collaboration has transformed how our team tracks tickets and monitors automation updates
One suggestion I would make for improving Slack Business - Enterprise is the support of multimedia such as images and videos that we can easily share through Slack. That would be great. Additionally, another thing is AI integration; if Slack has some AI capabilities to get insights about conversations or summarization, that would be a great feature. If Slack has an AI feature that can summarize a particular Slack thread and provide a summary of that, that would be a great feature for us. I would rate it a ten if it comes with some AI features, particularly using generative AI to produce summarization and other kinds of insights from communication in a more secure, data-secure way.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have had success with deploying Newsgator's social functionality on top of our SharePoint environment."
"Social communications that allows us to engage employees and to shorten communication cycles using social network techniques."
"I am impressed with the product's calls and screen share features which are very useful."
"Slack provides very fast communication."
"Slack is a powerpack bundle of features that help small or large organizations to handle teams and their tasks."
"Overall, it is a good idea as it works better than most solutions out there."
"It offers customization options for various applications, including integrations with Zoom for video calls and a wide range of other integration plugins."
"Slack is a very robust, flexible platform, which allows for a lot more, not just chat."
"If you're looking for an asynchronous/real-time communications tool, you will not find any app that comes close to Slack."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
 

Cons

"Need to improve their mobile / smartphone apps by adding more functionality."
"The OOB user interface should be enhanced to be more user-friendly and responsive."
"One suggestion I would make for improving Slack Business - Enterprise is the support of multimedia such as images and videos that we can easily share through Slack."
"Slack feels clustered and hence it should improve its design and UI."
"Its capabilities to provide security features could be better for corporations."
"Notifications are not as good as they could be (especially for mobile)."
"Slack's interface is not simple for me. It's not a user-friendly interface"
"I would like the in-meeting content sharing facility to be improved."
"Integrating Slack with calendar functions would be advantageous, allowing for the seamless scheduling of meetings within the platform."
"When scaled on a large scale, the solution's cost becomes a matter of concern for organizations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is an affordable solution."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution is cheap in my country."
"It's on the more expensive side."
"It is less expensive than one of its competitors."
"We use the free version that does not have a license."
"The tool's pricing could be cheaper."
"It is an expensive tool. We pay 15 to 20 USD monthly per user."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Performing Arts
11%
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business58
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Slack?
I am not aware of pricing, setup costs, or licensing, due to my company's partnership with Slack.
What needs improvement with Slack?
I am uncertain how Slack Business - Enterprise can be improved. Better notification controls, improved threading, and more integrations are all good features that seem relevant.
What is your primary use case for Slack?
My main use case for Slack Business - Enterprise is connecting between different teams and facilitating communication for teams. A quick, specific example of how my teams use Slack Business - Enter...
 

Also Known As

Social Sites, Sitrion Social Sites
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BitBurger, Daiichi-Sankyo, ING, Mercer, Merck, NSN, Renault, Stockland, Unisys
Strava, The New York Times, Spotify, Blue Bottle Coffee Company, Eventbrite, Box, Circa, Stripe
Find out what your peers are saying about Slack, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: May 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.