Kong Gateway Enterprise vs SwaggerHub comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kong and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Kong is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Kong holds a 3.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Kong users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Read 26 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews

7,756 Views
7,756 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 15 SwaggerHub reviews

3,465 Views
3,465 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kong Gateway Enterprise

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SwaggerHub and Kong Gateway Enterprise are both leading API management solutions competing in the API lifecycle space. While SwaggerHub shines with its competitive pricing and focus on API design, Kong Gateway Enterprise holds the upper hand in API management and performance capabilities.

Features: SwaggerHub offers robust API design and documentation tools, integration capabilities, and versioning, fostering collaboration among teams. Kong Gateway Enterprise excels in traffic control, security, and scalability, catering to enterprises with complex API needs. It also provides plugin support and role-based access control for extensive API governance.

Room for Improvement: SwaggerHub could enhance its API management capabilities to compete more effectively with high-demand environments. It might also benefit from offering more advanced security features. Kong Gateway Enterprise could improve in terms of user-friendliness, especially for those without deep technical expertise. Reducing its complexity in deployment and enhancing ease of integration for smaller teams would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SwaggerHub is straightforward and user-friendly, focusing on accessibility for designers and developers, with solid support infrastructure ensuring seamless deployment. Kong Gateway Enterprise, while powerful, requires more technical expertise for deployment. However, it mitigates this with comprehensive customer support and resources to handle detailed configurations.

Pricing and ROI: SwaggerHub stands out for its competitive initial setup costs and flexible pricing models, offering high ROI for teams focused on API design and collaboration. Kong Gateway Enterprise, although with higher upfront costs, provides substantial ROI through long-term value in managing demanding API environments, addressing the needs of enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 3.5%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.9%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kong Gateway Enterprise	3.5%
SwaggerHub	1.9%
Other	94.6%

API Management

Featured Reviews

KuntalSaha

Business Consultant at Ernst & Young

Modernization projects have progressed well but documentation and security guidance still need work

Bringing in additional features to Kong Gateway Enterprise would not necessarily help it. Improving the existing features, increasing security, and adding robustness would be more beneficial. The focus should be on stabilizing the product, improving it, and increasing the documentation. Kong should focus on how the product can be self-onboarded or self-implemented, as this would ease and help customers significantly. The necessary deployment of Kong Gateway Enterprise, API management, and guidance on how customers can use it or improve that area would be helpful. Security is a major concern, especially with new security architecture coming into place. These are the areas that should be prioritized. Beyond these areas, I do not see anything lacking. Kong Gateway Enterprise is quite comprehensive.

Read full review

Coralia Popa

Software Architect at Waters Corporation

Centralized API documentation has supported versioned collaboration across our teams

We have tried automated code generation several times, and I think maybe some people are still using it somewhere, but it is not something that we do as a consolidated practice. At some point, we were missing some tagging of the APIs, and we could not do that. We asked the provider, but I do not believe they added that kind of support. However, we somehow gave up a bit because we are now in the process of moving to different platforms ourselves, so most likely we are not going to invest in improving this integration with SwaggerHub or how we are using it. We will just keep it going for the platform we are leaving, and then because our focus is in a different place, we are not looking to change or do other things. I am not using SwaggerHub's OpenAI management feature. We are not looking much at what they added new. We got some notification that they added things, but we have so many other things to do.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The route limiting feature is very valuable."

"There are a few features that I like about Kong when it comes to authentication and authorization. Specifically, being able to use Kong for role-based access control (RBAC), and then further being able to integrate the RBAC mechanism with our enterprise directory, was very useful."

"The tool's scalability is good...The solution's technical support is good."

"Kong Gateway helped to improve performance. It's good enough for our users."

"I like everything about it. It provides the security we need."

"In terms of stability, the tool's team has made some good efforts, and my company is very happy with the product's approach."

"Protocol transformation is the most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise."

"It offers a wide range of plugins that we leverage, including OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions, and more."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"SwaggerHub has significantly improved how my organization designs, documents, and manages APIs, centralizing API management so that all API definitions are stored in one location, which makes it easy for stakeholders, developers, QA, DevOps, and products to access the latest version."

"The scalability is endless."

"Since I started using SwaggerHub, it has had a positive impact on our organization due to better collaboration between developers and the quality assurance team, and it has reduced errors because of its automated validation."

"It is a stable solution."

"The best feature that SwaggerHub offers is the collaboration capability that helps us the most across all of our teams, as we have a single API infrastructure but several teams working in different areas of these APIs."

"You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs."

"It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing."

More SwaggerHub pros

Cons

"It becomes difficult if you try to scale it up to multiple clusters."

"Kong Enterprise has decided not to support the web portal feature anymore, but I think that feature should stay in the on-premises solution."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating with .NET solutions."

"The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful."

"The solution should include policy features that are available in other solutions like MuleSoft API manager but missing in Kong Enterprise."

"We are facing issues with the solution's features like reports and traffic analysis."

"Kong is meant for north-south communications, so it will be interesting to see what solutions they can come up with in the realms of east-west communications, service-to-service communications, and Zero Trust architecture. I believe that if they can provide for these areas, then they will be able to solve the overall integration and security concerns for microservices architecture in general."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"In SwaggerHub, I appreciate that it is a powerful platform for API design and collaboration, but currently, the access control is somewhat limited."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"One of the most difficult things about SwaggerHub is the user interface and its usability, as it can feel quite complex and require too many clicks for simple actions."

"At some point, we were missing some tagging of the APIs, and we could not do that."

"It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

More SwaggerHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."

"The licensing fees are paid yearly."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."

"The product is reasonably priced because it goes by the SaaS model."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."

"There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."

"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."

"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"The tool is cheap."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kong Enterprise?

Our primary use cases for Kong Gateway Enterprise are modernizations, migrations, and digitalizations of financial institutions. These are the primary areas we are looking for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

SwaggerHub can be improved since the API testing features are limited compared to Postman, and it is somewhat expensive for small teams as paid plans cost a lot.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

My main use case for SwaggerHub is to design and review API specifications, as I test endpoints with the help of Swagger UI, validate the request and the response schemas, and share the API documen...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SwaggerHub?

Before using SwaggerHub, I advise having basic API knowledge, as those with API knowledge can easily use SwaggerHub. I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs SwaggerHub

Compared 14% of the time

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 7% of the time

Stoplight vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

Apiary vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

IBM API Connect vs SwaggerHub

Compared 3% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise

October 2026

Download Kong Gateway Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub

October 2026

Download SwaggerHub product report

Overview

Kong Gateway Enterprise is an advanced API management platform offering seamless integration, robust security features, and flexible deployment options for modern enterprises needing efficient API handling.

Kong Gateway Enterprise stands out with its plugin-based network services and ease of implementation in Kubernetes environments. It delivers robust API governance, impressive rate limiting, and customization with Lua scripts. Enhanced with high-performance handling and AI-driven functionality, it supports efficient API monetization. It also ensures competitive pricing, scalability, and strong community support.

What are the key features of Kong Gateway Enterprise?

Plugin-Based Services: Allows easy customization and integration.
Security: Delivers comprehensive API security options.
Rate Limiting: Offers control over API traffic for better performance.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports cloud environments effortlessly.
AI Integration: Enhances functionality with AI-driven applications.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in Kong Gateway Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies API management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growth with robust infrastructure.
Customizability: Tailors API management with Lua scripts.
Community Support: Offers strong resources and collaboration opportunities.
API Monetization: Enables revenue opportunities through efficient management.

Organizations across finance, IoT, manufacturing, and e-commerce sectors implement Kong Gateway Enterprise to streamline microservices deployment and integration. It manages API security and traffic while providing observability and scalability. The platform enables integration with IDPs and other systems, securing extensive API ecosystems.

Kong

SwaggerHub streamlines API management with features like centralized management and real-time collaboration, enhancing team efficiency. Its user-friendly interface facilitates API design and testing, offering seamless integration with third-party tools for enhanced teamwork.

SwaggerHub provides centralized API definitions enabling easy access and reducing manual errors, which accelerates development. Its role-based access and versioning foster better communication and control among teams. While improvements could enhance Azure, GCP integrations, and CI/CD pipeline connectivity, users note a currently limited UI scalability and restricted customization, especially in developer portals. API tagging, OpenAPI 3.1 support, and permissions enhancements are requested, alongside addressing stability under heavy loads and streamlining import/export processes. Competitive pricing is a concern for smaller teams, who find fewer features compared to competitors like Postman. Primarily used for API publishing, documentation, and testing, SwaggerHub integrates with SmartBear ReadyAPI for validation, supporting team collaboration through interactive documentation. It aids in client SDK generation and version control while facilitating automated testing and secure API management.

What features does SwaggerHub offer?

Centralized API Management: Enhances access and reduces errors
Real-Time Collaboration: Boosts team efficiency
Automated Validations: Improves API design accuracy
Seamless Third-Party Integration: Facilitates teamwork
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API handling

What benefits should be considered?

Enhanced Collaboration: Teams can work effectively with centralized access
Improved Efficiency: Reduces errors and accelerates development
Better Control: Role-based access and versioning enhance team management
Integration Capabilities: Connects smoothly with other tools

In industries using SwaggerHub, teams benefit from its centralized approach to API management, ensuring standardized documentation and testing practices. It supports seamless collaboration across departments, streamlining processes for industries heavily reliant on API services like finance, healthcare, and technology.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub

September 2026

Free Report: Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.