SwaggerHub Pros

MahmoudAl-Hattab - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Architect at Second Step
Code generation is one of the important features of SwaggerHub. We design our API, and we can generate a very rich codebase and add to it. The code generation feature is very valuable.
View full review »
Coralia Popa - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Architect at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing.
View full review »
Hasham Mohammad - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Engineering at Capgemini
The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications.
View full review »

SwaggerHub Cons

MahmoudAl-Hattab - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Architect at Second Step
SwaggerHub lacks in terms of integrations. They have APIs integrated, and they also have some connectors, but they don't have integration with many of the things that we use. For example, for connecting with SVN, we had to implement external scripts. So, they should work on the integration because currently, we have to work on the integration with our DevOps, continuous delivery, or continuous deployment. It would be great if these integrations are built-in. Mainly, we would like it to integrate with SVN and Jira.
View full review »
Coralia Popa - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Architect at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that.
View full review »
Hasham Mohammad - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Engineering at Capgemini
SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools.
View full review »
Buyer's Guide
API Management
November 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, Oracle, Google and others in API Management. Updated: November 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.