Microsoft Azure API Management vs SwaggerHub comparison

Microsoft and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9, while SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.6. Microsoft holds a 17.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 81 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

21,405 Views
17,426 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 10 SwaggerHub reviews

1,632 Views
1,215 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and SwaggerHub are competing in the API management category. Microsoft Azure API Management is favored for extensive features and support, while SwaggerHub shines in API design and documentation capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management offers robust integration, scaling, and monitoring tools, making it suitable for large-scale enterprises. SwaggerHub excels in collaborative features, intuitive design workspace, and robust documentation, catering to API-focused teams.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management could simplify its complexity for easier use in smaller setups and enhance UI intuitiveness. Improvements in SwaggerHub could include expanding scalability options, better integration capabilities, and offering more comprehensive enterprise-level functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure API Management requires complex setup but provides strong technical support, facilitating deployments especially in enterprise environments. SwaggerHub offers simpler deployments and responsive support, appealing to smaller teams and new market entrants.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management's higher setup costs align with its enterprise-level features, providing strong ROI for large organizations. SwaggerHub, with moderate pricing, offers good ROI for teams focusing on API design efficiency and targeted management needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 17.1%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Praveen_Srivastava

Solution Architect at Cognizant

Streamlined operations with gateway and authentication features

Azure API Management has helped streamline our operations by acting as a gateway for upstream and downstream applications. It provides authentication and authorization, ensuring that both verified and suspicious users are managed efficiently. The use of analytics within API Management is also valuable for tracking user behavior and ensuring security.

Read full review

SwaminathanSubramanian

Director/Enterprise Solutions Architect, Technology Advisor at Kyndryl

Facilitating enterprise-wide API governance and management

Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account. The scalability also needs enhancement, as it becomes flaky under increased load. Additionally, the versioning management could be improved to be on par with source code management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with Azure Active Directory is a good security feature for authentication and authorization. There is multifactor authentication. You can also use all of the Azure AD features integrated with API Management."

"We use Microsoft due to the stability of the company."

"Monitoring: It gives us a detailed overview of how clients are using the API and it allows us to see the consumption trends in real-time."

"We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS."

"It's easy to use compared to other products. It's easy to set up."

"The solution is quite stable. We have no issues with it. there have been no crashes and we haven't experienced bugs or glitches. It's been quite reliable."

"It's a very robust tool. So you see that there is a developer portal which can be used by developer or the vendors as well. And other external partners to create keys and manage their own APIs. The other thing is that they have a lot of policies there are too many options within API. So I do the difficult to tell one, but probably I would say, like, proxy sorry. The policies is one of the thing wherein you can just configure the policies and modify the behavior of the APIs."

"The simplicity to learn and apply using API Management is valuable."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs."

"The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing."

"The scalability is endless."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

More SwaggerHub pros

Cons

"I'd like to have better flexibility and more capabilities."

"The API gateway can be very complex."

"They need to work on the third party integrations."

"They're trying to implement versioning and trying to be able to manage different versions of your API all at the same time, but they're not doing that just quite right yet."

"I would like to see more security features become available."

"Azure API Management could be improved with better integration with all of Microsoft's tools."

"The portal where we publish the APIs could be improved. Maybe this is because we didn't configure it. It is quite easy to bypass API management because we have a lot of information shared on the portal, where we publish our APIs. I worry there is potential for a security breach in the API publishing. There needs to be more security available on terms of the way we publish them."

"There is a limitation of 32 kb of data in the APIs. Having the limitation increase would be a benefit."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

"SwaggerHub's UI needs to be improved as it looks very old school."

More SwaggerHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are paying standard fees to use Microsoft Azure API Management."

"Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"We pay for a yearly license."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"It's an expensive solution"

"I rate the solution's pricing between three and four, as it could be more competitive."

"It's pay as you go. The subscription packages have room for different scales. It's calculated by the number of apps or computers you use. You do not have to use the enterprise subscription. These subscriptions have different pricing, so you can find one to meet your needs for scalability."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"The tool is cheap."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about SwaggerHub?

The tool's most valuable feature is licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I started using SwaggerHub in its previous version, SmartMiner, with a tool called SoapUI. I used it to create mock web services to test web services and create test scripts and mock APIs. This usa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 45% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 20% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 19% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 9% of the time

Postman vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

Stoplight vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

Gravitee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

May 2025

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

May 2025

Download SwaggerHub product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.