Komodor vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] comparison

Komodor and Nutanix are both solutions in the Container Management category. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Komodor

Read 6 Komodor reviews

1,275 Views
1,275 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Komodor

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine and Komodor compete in Kubernetes management. Komodor outperforms in troubleshooting with context-rich insights, while Nutanix excels in integration.

Features: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine provides seamless integration with Nutanix environments, a comprehensive dashboard for cluster management, and excellent resource allocation capabilities. Komodor offers real-time incident monitoring, intuitive issue tracking, and historical data visibility, enhancing debugging and troubleshooting efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Nutanix could enhance Kubernetes-specific insights, expand support for non-Nutanix environments, and improve customer awareness of its integration capabilities. Komodor may benefit from improving Kubernetes learning tools, expanding historical log access, and enhancing triage efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix integrates smoothly with its ecosystem, simplifying adaptation for current users. Komodor stands out with user-friendly setup and 24/7 support, ensuring swift incident resolution and comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Nutanix offers cost efficiencies for existing customers utilizing the Nutanix infrastructure. Komodor, with a focus on reducing downtime and operational efficiency, justifies its investment through proactive problem-solving and high ROI, supported by consistent updates and assistance.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Komodor

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (13th)

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2785698

Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees

Unified cloud workloads have become visible and teams manage kubernetes issues efficiently

This is the main task that we use Komodor for, and one additional benefit is that it is also helpful for platform and site reliability engineers to check how many clusters are up and running and how many clusters are accepting the workloads from the users. One of the best features that Komodor offers is Cloud AI, which debugs all the logs and gives the exact root cause for the issue. From there, we know we do not need an engineer who is an expert in Kubernetes to debug the issue. Cloud AI has definitely helped my team by saving time, not in a single instance but in multiple cases where we have used Cloud AI for debugging issues in the Kubernetes pods. Komodor has positively impacted our organization. Since adopting it, all the issues we faced while managing Rancher are gone, and we are seeing 100% availability for Komodor. 100% availability with Komodor means there have been improvements in uptime and productivity. For instance, when application teams want to deploy their applications, if Rancher is not up or running, the deployments usually fail at the deployment stage. In the case of Komodor, there have been no such cases reported after adopting it. We saw 100% uptime most of the time, except for some issues with AWS outages.

Read full review

reviewer2741271

Nutanix Administrator at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has provided seamless upgrade experiences and robust technical support

I have heard there are many features added in NKP that are not available in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, such as load balancer features. The unified control plane feature is not being used in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. We are currently using a third-party tool for load balancing, but going forward, NKP will include load balancer, ingress, and egress features, making infrastructure management much easier. There is no auto-scaling feature in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE; however, NKP offers it. In NKE, we created additional worker nodes and increased CPU and RAM capacity, but it required manual intervention. Concerning policy-driven governance in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, we have the ability to implement RBAC at the cluster level, which helps maintain security by not granting full admin privileges to every end user, thus restricting access effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"Since adopting it, all the issues we faced while managing Rancher are gone, and we are seeing 100% availability for Komodor."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"Overall, Komodor is a very good platform for managing Kubernetes-related infrastructure, and as of now, my experience with Komodor is very positive."

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."

"Nutanix is very stable and reliable, based on my experience with many customers, including large banks and telcos."

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"The technical support is excellent."

"We can do a lot of provisioning."

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] pros

Cons

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"We need a backup of production clusters."

"It's mostly for lab purposes; we haven't seen a lot of traction in the market from enterprise customers yet."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Komodor?

I am not involved in the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Komodor, so someone from my team will take care of that. Compared with Rancher or any other tools, Komodor is priced cheaply and avai...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

There are some features related to the platform that are missing in Komodor, such as Tigera status or CNI pods. Including these features would be helpful for platform engineers.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Komodor?

My main use case for Komodor is visualizing the workloads that we deploy onto the Kubernetes infrastructure across all three major clouds using Azure, EKS, AKS, and Google Cloud. We use Komodor to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

In terms of features, I cannot comment technically, but the real value is the consolidated out-of-the-box solution that Nutanix offers. Nutanix has built great branding and a lot of credibility and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have experience with OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Nutanix, as we are one of the largest Nutanix resellers in the Middle East. We handle Kubernetes on the cloud as well, so we manage most of the Kub...

See all answers

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 58% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 12% of the time

Kubernetes vs Komodor

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Komodor

Compared 4% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

January 2026

Download Komodor product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

January 2026

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nutanix Karbon

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Komodor

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] offers easy deployment, efficient resource management, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure, supporting virtualization and configurable RBAC.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] simplifies Kubernetes cluster deployment and management, offering robust features such as health checks and seamless upgrades. It integrates with existing systems, supports virtualization, and provides a unified console. Automatic load management and scalability contribute to its stability. Though migrating via VMware poses challenges and documentation updates are needed, potential enhancements include dynamic resource scaling, advanced backup options, and improved disaster recovery. NKE is ideal for microservices, container management, and application modernization, playing a vital role in DevOps settings.

What are the key features of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Easy Deployment: Simplifies cluster setup and management for quick ramp-up.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently allocates computing resources for optimized operations.
Seamless Upgrades: Handles updates without causing downtime.
Integration: Works with existing infrastructure, allowing virtualization support.
Console Management: Offers a single interface for robust management features.

What benefits should users look for in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a reliable Kubernetes platform with reduced operational costs.
Scalability: Ensures stability and growth alongside increasing demands.
Support Features: Includes robust technical support for a seamless experience.
Efficiency: Enhances workload management in DevOps environments.
Configurable Options: Allows tailored RBAC and scalable virtualization benefits.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is deployed in industries focusing on microservices and application modernization, serving development to testing environments. It integrates with hardware and API tools, supporting DevOps workloads and infrastructure management. Primarily used on-premises, it supports large-scale application deployment leveraging network capabilities.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Kubernetes and others in Container Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.