Komodor vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Komodor Logo
825 views|164 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Nutanix Logo
3,958 views|3,157 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Komodor and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging.""The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues.""The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened.""Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature.""The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

More Komodor Pros →

"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs.""The technical support is excellent.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.""The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code.""We can do a lot of provisioning.""We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to.""The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Pros →

Cons
"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development.""I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved.""I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster.""Komodor's visibility could be improved.""One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

More Komodor Cons →

"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability.""I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage.""In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling.""There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network.""We need a backup of production clusters.""GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process.""The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems.""I have issues with the product's interoperability."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."
  • "We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."
  • "The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."
  • "Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."
  • More Komodor Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."
  • "I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
  • "I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."
  • "The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."
  • More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly… more »
    Top Answer:The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher… more »
    Top Answer:There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.
    Top Answer:Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability. While basic tasks like cluster creation and… more »
    Top Answer:We utilize NKE to create these clusters, configuring components to meet specific business requirements.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    825
    Comparisons
    164
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    1,828
    Rating
    8.8
    11th
    Views
    3,958
    Comparisons
    3,157
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    366
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Nutanix Karbon
    Learn More
    Overview

    Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

    Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) is an enterprise Kubernetes management solution that simplifies provisioning, operations, and lifecycle management of Kubernetes.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Wellness & Fitness Company30%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company11%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Insurance Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise20%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Komodor is ranked 12th in Container Management with 5 reviews while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is ranked 11th in Container Management with 9 reviews. Komodor is rated 8.8, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Komodor writes "Provides extensive visibility into our nodes and has been incredibly useful in freeing up our DevOps staff for other projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE writes "Stable platform with an easy initial setup process ". Komodor is most compared with Portainer, Amazon EKS and Rancher Labs, whereas Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, NGINX Ingress Controller and Rancher Labs. See our Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE report.

    See our list of best Container Management vendors.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.