Komodor vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE comparison

Komodor and Nutanix are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nutanix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.5. Komodor holds a 3.5% mindshare in CM, compared to Nutanix’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Komodor

Read 5 Komodor reviews

1,227 Views
413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Read 12 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE reviews

2,957 Views
2,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Komodor

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine and Komodor compete in the Kubernetes management category. Komodor appears to have the upper hand due to its strong troubleshooting and monitoring capabilities, offering greater operational support versatility.

Features: NKE stands out for its seamless integration with Nutanix infrastructure, easy cluster deployment, and strong compatibility with existing ecosystems. Komodor offers efficient troubleshooting, comprehensive insights into operations, and a centralized event timeline, providing visibility across clusters and facilitating quick problem resolution.

Room for Improvement: NKE could enhance its troubleshooting features and expand support for non-Nutanix environments. It would also benefit from more flexible pricing options. Komodor might improve by reducing onboarding time for new users, optimizing resource management metrics, and offering more detailed historical data views.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NKE provides streamlined deployment within Nutanix environments, benefiting from infrastructure alignment and focused technical support. Komodor offers straightforward installation independent of infrastructure, supporting varied environments with proactive issue resolution and flexible operational support.

Pricing and ROI: NKE can incur significant costs with additional infrastructure needs, but the ROI aligns with existing Nutanix investments. Komodor provides a flexible pricing model emphasizing operational efficiency returns, potentially justifying higher upfront costs through savings in troubleshooting time and improved operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Ranking in Container Management

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 3.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is 9.1%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources.

Read full review

Prasanthraj PN

Sales Director at InnovationTQ

Offers efficient deployment and management with easy resource allocation, yet faces challenges in integration and compatibility

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-engine-nke-reviews ) offers easy and fast deployment, management, stability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. The resource allocation is very simple. If we need to expand the memory, storage space, or processor core, it is very easy to manage through our central control. These features are what stand out the most.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

"We can do a lot of provisioning."

"The technical support is excellent."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

"Nutanix's support is really good."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE pros

Cons

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"I have issues with the product's interoperability."

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."

"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."

"We need a backup of production clusters."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Wellness & Fitness Company

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Komodor?

The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging du...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

We are using Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-engine-nke-reviews ) in our organization. It is implemented on Cisco M7 ( /products/oracle-supercluster-reviews ) Series ( ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 82% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 15% of the time

Kubernetes vs Komodor

Compared 3% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 39% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 22% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 11% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 8% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 7% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

April 2025

Download Komodor product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

April 2025

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nutanix Karbon

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Komodor

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) is an enterprise Kubernetes management solution that simplifies provisioning, operations, and lifecycle management of Kubernetes.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

April 2025

Free Report: Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Komodor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.