Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Komodor vs Rancher Labs comparison

Komodor and Rancher Labs are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Rancher Labs is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.3. Komodor holds a 3.6% mindshare in CM, compared to Rancher Labs’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rancher Labs users who would recommend it.
Komodor
Read 5 Komodor reviews
  • 1,201 Views
  • 1,201 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Rancher Labs
Read 14 Rancher Labs reviews
  • 2,793 Views
  • 2,653 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Rancher Labs and Komodor compete in the Kubernetes ecosystem, with Rancher Labs offering extensive multi-cluster support while Komodor excels in troubleshooting capabilities. Rancher Labs has the upper hand in infrastructure management and integration support, whereas Komodor leads in incident resolution efficiency and real-time troubleshooting.

Features: Rancher Labs provides robust multi-cluster management, integration with numerous cloud providers, and scalable infrastructure management. Komodor offers detailed visibility into Kubernetes applications, comprehensive monitoring tools, and efficient issue resolution.

Room for Improvement: Rancher Labs could enhance its user interface and expand documentation for ease of use. Improving customer support response times and refining integration processes could also be beneficial. Komodor might focus on expanding feature sets, providing more educational resources for users new to Kubernetes, and improving the intuitive nature of their platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rancher Labs features straightforward deployment supported by detailed documentation and robust customer service, facilitating seamless integration. Komodor's deployment emphasizes quick setup with a user-friendly interface, offering excellent support for application monitoring and active user engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Rancher Labs is competitively priced with favorable ROI due to its ability to support diverse environments. Komodor, although perceived as more premium, provides compelling value through advanced troubleshooting features that boost operational efficiency. While Rancher Labs delivers cost-effectiveness, Komodor offers substantial value for teams prioritizing incident resolution.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Rancher Labs Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Komodor vs. Rancher Labs
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
9.3
Komodor improved developer efficiency, enhanced cost management, and enabled quick issue resolution, achieving up to ninety percent return.
Sentiment score
8.5
Rancher Labs provides efficient open-source solutions like OpenShift with significant cost savings and an eight out of ten rating.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.3
Komodor receives high praise for technical support, though time zone differences occasionally affect West Coast response times.
Sentiment score
7.8
Rancher Labs' customer service and technical support are praised for responsiveness, with users valuing community forums for assistance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.3
Komodor is widely recognized for its scalability, effectively managing infrastructure, nodes, and varying clusters across different environments.
Sentiment score
7.7
Rancher Labs offers robust scalability for small to large teams, with effective deployment and minor automation improvements suggested.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Users have mixed experiences with Komodor's stability; updates improved performance, with many satisfied despite occasional issues.
Sentiment score
8.7
Rancher Labs is praised for its stability and reliability, though users note complexity and upgrade challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improved visibility, metrics, performance, permissions, and features for better platform support and high availability in clusters.
Rancher Labs needs improved stability, integrations, user-friendly features, enhanced security, multicloud support, and better community and development resources.
 

Setup Cost

Komodor's resource-based pricing model is affordable for small businesses and competitive for larger enterprises, with well-received setup costs.
Rancher Labs provides a cost-effective open-source container orchestration with optional paid support, seen as competitively mid-range priced.
 

Valuable Features

Komodor enhances troubleshooting and productivity with deployment notifications, real-time metrics, centralized views, and easy onboarding for Kubernetes newcomers.
Rancher Labs offers user-friendly Kubernetes management, seamless integrations, and supports GitOps and virtual machine management with promising potential.
 

Categories and Ranking

Komodor
Ranking in Container Management
13th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rancher Labs
Ranking in Container Management
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Data Storage for Kubernetes (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 3.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rancher Labs is 5.6%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Rancher Labs5.6%
Komodor3.6%
Other90.8%
Container Management
 

Featured Reviews

LO
Landon Orr
Principal SRE at Cowbell Cyber
Provides extensive visibility into our nodes and has been incredibly useful in freeing up our DevOps staff for other projects
I have used Komodor for two and a half years, and it has come a long way. However, I would say that performance could be improved. Sometimes, it takes longer than it should for developers to pull up logs or interact with the cluster. Komodor is aware of this issue and is working on a fix. Secondly, I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved. It is not the most intuitive system in the world, and it can be difficult to set up. I think Komodor could improve the alert interface by making it more user-friendly. Finally, I would like to see Komodor add ServiceMaster visibility. This would give us greater insights into how our services interact with each other. This would be very helpful in troubleshooting problems, as it would allow us to quickly identify which services are affected when one service goes down. Komodor does not currently have this capability, but I hope they will add it in the future.
Read full review
RyanVassallo - PeerSpot reviewer
RyanVassallo
Head of Systems and Infrastructure at Booming Games
Offers an open-source version along with a good UI
The product has multiple good features. One of the solution's good features is that it is the GitOps functionality known as Rancher fleet, which is used for continuous delivery. The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or on-premises, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations. The tool also has a feature that is still kind of maturing, but I think it has very good potential. This new feature is named Harvester, which is allows users to have virtual machines managed by Kubernetes engine. This is very new technology in the market. I think that Harvester needs to mature as a product, and I think that in the future, it will be very powerful. You have one tool that does many things for you.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Media Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
46%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Rancher Labs?
The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rancher Labs?
The cost is reasonable since it's open-source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Rancher Labs?
While Rancher Labs provides some level of security, it's not considered very robust. We found it to offer basic security features, which met some of our requirements, but we also relied on other op...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor Logo
Portainer vs Komodor
Compared 71% of the time
Kubernetes vs Komodor Logo
Kubernetes vs Komodor
Compared 8% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor
Compared 5% of the time
Amazon EKS vs Komodor Logo
Amazon EKS vs Komodor
Compared 3% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs Komodor Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Komodor
Compared 2% of the time
More Komodor Competitors
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Rancher Labs Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Rancher Labs
Compared 37% of the time
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Rancher Labs Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Rancher Labs
Compared 13% of the time
Docker vs Rancher Labs Logo
Docker vs Rancher Labs
Compared 8% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Rancher Labs Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Rancher Labs
Compared 6% of the time
HashiCorp Nomad vs Rancher Labs Logo
HashiCorp Nomad vs Rancher Labs
Compared 5% of the time
More Rancher Labs Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Komodor
December 2025
Komodor reportDownload Komodor product report
Buyer's Guide
Rancher Labs
December 2025
Rancher Labs reportDownload Rancher Labs product report
 

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Komodor

Rancher Labs build innovative, open source software that makes it easy to deploy and manage containers in production on any infrastructure. We enable organizations to accelerate all aspects of their software development pipeline, from writing and testing code to running complex microservices-based applications.

Rancher, our flagship container management platform, allows users to easily manage all aspects of running containers in development and production environments, on any infrastructure. With well over four million downloads, Rancher has quickly become the tools of choice for teams serious about running containers in production. This includes large enterprises such as Sony, IBM, Tyco, Align Technologies and more.

Rancher Labs
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Albert Heijn, Bell, BMC, Samsung, WindStream, Johnson & Johnson
Buyer's Guide
Komodor vs. Rancher Labs
December 2025
Free Report: Komodor vs. Rancher Labs
Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Rancher Labs and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Komodor vs. Rancher Labs report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.