Komodor vs Kubernetes comparison

Komodor and Kubernetes are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kubernetes is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Komodor holds a 4.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Kubernetes’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Kubernetes users who would recommend it.

Komodor

Read 5 Komodor reviews

1,242 Views
1,242 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kubernetes

Read 78 Kubernetes reviews

2,832 Views
2,804 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Komodor

Kubernetes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Kubernetes and Komodor operate in the realm of container management and troubleshooting. Komodor seems to hold an advantage due to its strong troubleshooting capabilities, despite Kubernetes being more cost-effective.

Features: Kubernetes offers scalability, flexibility, and a strong community support system. It excels in managing complex containerized applications, providing robust orchestration. Komodor, on the other hand, shines with its real-time monitoring, root cause analysis, and the ability to swiftly identify and resolve issues.

Room for Improvement: Kubernetes could improve in deployment simplicity, personalized support, and maintenance requirements. It involves a steep learning curve that requires skilled personnel. Komodor might enhance its pricing model, broaden feature scope beyond troubleshooting, and expand integration capabilities with other platforms or services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kubernetes demands advanced expertise for deployment and maintenance and often involves resource-intensive management. Community-driven support is vast but lacks personalized assistance. Komodor simplifies deployment with a user-friendly setup and offers responsive customer service, facilitating faster resolution times and making it more user-friendly for streamlined operations.

Pricing and ROI: Kubernetes benefits from being open-source, leading to lower direct costs but may incur hidden expenses related to support. Komodor carries additional costs for its tools yet provides significant ROI by reducing downtime and simplifying troubleshooting tasks. This efficiency and time-saving lead to greater ROI, making Komodor a worthwhile investment for managing Kubernetes environments effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Kubernetes Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Kubernetes

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,170 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kubernetes

Ranking in Container Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 4.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kubernetes is 5.5%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources. I am looking forward to using AI-powered troubleshooting workflow that Komodor unrolled recently.

Read full review

Venu Boddu

AWS DevOps Engineer at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Manage infrastructure automation and smooth application deployment with robust auto-scaling capabilities

Kubernetes is highly valuable for its node-based setup, which allows for the running of multiple pods. This feature is essential for infrastructure automation and application deployment. Kubernetes also offers rollback control and auto-scaling capabilities, which are crucial for maintaining an application's availability even if nodes or pods go down. Additionally, Kubernetes supports load balancing to distribute traffic efficiently across multiple pods.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"The most valuable feature is the support for Docker containers."

"The cloud-managed Kubernetes allow us to take care of a big system and deployment and container management without having a big operational team."

"Kubernetes provides scalable clustering for containers and other means of deployment."

"Offers a crucial feedback process"

"Once you get it configured properly, it's a stable solution."

"All the current features are quite harmonic."

"Kubernetes has everything. Its design structure is quite advanced, and its offerings are extensive. The practical feature was the seamless failover."

"Kubernetes also offers rollback control and auto-scaling capabilities, which are crucial for maintaining an application's availability even if nodes or pods go down."

More Kubernetes pros

Cons

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

"Some Kubernetes technical support would be helpful."

"The tool needs to improve its UI. The tool is very complex and basic."

"Lacks some scalability and more user-friendly operability."

"This solution is not very easy to use."

"I'm a beginner, and I recently started working with Kubernetes. As of now, I don't see any bugs. However, it would be better if it could be deployed without coding."

"The setup and operation of the product should be simplified."

"The price is something they need to improve."

"They should make documentation simpler for learning."

More Kubernetes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

"The solution is open source and has no fees."

"Kubernetes is open-source. Kubernetes is free, but we're charged for AWS utilization."

"There is no licensing fee."

"The solution is affordable."

"Pricing isn't a major concern for us. Since we resell Kubernetes services and focus on providing support, integration, and education, we don't usually have pricing issues. Our customers are more concerned with getting the right support and services than the cost. So, the value we provide is more important than the actual pricing. Pricing might change in the future, but it’s not a big issue for us right now."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs associated with its use."

"Kubernetes is an open-source solution that can be free. We have some distribution with licenses, such OpenShift and Tucows in Amazon. They are billing services."

"There are no licensing fees."

More Kubernetes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Wellness & Fitness Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Komodor?

We are an HR analytics company, and we do a lot of data processing. Our customers send us their HR-related data, and we process it so that we can run analytics on it. We process it on Kubernetes cl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kubernetes?

There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes?

Since we use Kubernetes on-premises, the costs are related to our expertise and the personnel we hire.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kubernetes?

Although we face issues when migrating to new versions of Kubernetes, such as misunderstandings on using new features or integration with proxy services, these issues can be addressed with proper p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 82% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor

Compared 2% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 44% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Kubernetes

Compared 16% of the time

Portainer vs Kubernetes

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 7% of the time

More Kubernetes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

June 2025

Download Komodor product report

Buyer's Guide

Kubernetes

June 2025

Download Kubernetes product report

Also Known As

No data available

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Komodor

Kubernetes (K8s) is an open-source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.
It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes builds upon 15 years of experience of running production workloads at Google, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community.

Kubernetes

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Kubernetes

June 2025

Free Report: Komodor vs. Kubernetes

Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Kubernetes and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Komodor vs. Kubernetes report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.