Komodor vs Kubernetes comparison

Komodor and Kubernetes are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8, while Kubernetes is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7. Komodor holds a 1.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Kubernetes’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kubernetes users who would recommend it.

Komodor

Read 5 Komodor reviews

919 Views
173 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kubernetes

Read 75 Kubernetes reviews

6,009 Views
3,913 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Komodor

Kubernetes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Kubernetes and Komodor operate in the realm of container management and troubleshooting. Komodor seems to hold an advantage due to its strong troubleshooting capabilities, despite Kubernetes being more cost-effective.

Features: Kubernetes offers scalability, flexibility, and a strong community support system. It excels in managing complex containerized applications, providing robust orchestration. Komodor, on the other hand, shines with its real-time monitoring, root cause analysis, and the ability to swiftly identify and resolve issues.

Room for Improvement: Kubernetes could improve in deployment simplicity, personalized support, and maintenance requirements. It involves a steep learning curve that requires skilled personnel. Komodor might enhance its pricing model, broaden feature scope beyond troubleshooting, and expand integration capabilities with other platforms or services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kubernetes demands advanced expertise for deployment and maintenance and often involves resource-intensive management. Community-driven support is vast but lacks personalized assistance. Komodor simplifies deployment with a user-friendly setup and offers responsive customer service, facilitating faster resolution times and making it more user-friendly for streamlined operations.

Pricing and ROI: Kubernetes benefits from being open-source, leading to lower direct costs but may incur hidden expenses related to support. Komodor carries additional costs for its tools yet provides significant ROI by reducing downtime and simplifying troubleshooting tasks. This efficiency and time-saving lead to greater ROI, making Komodor a worthwhile investment for managing Kubernetes environments effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Kubernetes Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Kubernetes

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 812,628 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kubernetes

Ranking in Container Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kubernetes is 5.8%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Nov 10, 2023

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources.

Read full review

Swayan Jeet Mishra

Lead Machine Learning Engineer at Schlumberger

Dec 13, 2022

Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions

We're using it to deploy our machine learning solutions. Every public cloud has their own version of Kubernetes. For example, Google has its own version, which is known as the Google Kubernetes Engine. AWS has its own version, which is known as the Elastic Kubernetes Services, EKS. Our entire data…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

"Offers a crucial feedback process"

"The cluster is very stable with outward scalability and good performance."

"The scanning and support network."

"I found it to be an excellent solution for application deployment. It's great for containerization."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Kubernetes has everything. Its design structure is quite advanced, and its offerings are extensive. The practical feature was the seamless failover."

"Offers automated rollouts and storage orchestration"

"I like that it gives you all the flexibility, for example, auto-scaling. Everything is figured out exactly right. It manages all your workloads without much intervention. It can scale in, scale out, and with security. Everything looks pretty good compared to the old legacy way of working."

More Kubernetes pros

Cons

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"There is not a large ecosystem surrounding Kubernetes, making it difficult to identify the right problem due to the vast number of solutions."

"Having a thread dump and memory dump, and seeing how many objects were created would be useful."

"The first time it was a little bit complex to setup the solution."

"Kubernetes is a complex solution. The product needs to be more manageable and user-friendly."

"The plugins could be better. That is one pain point we had, and we had to get in with many other open standards, like Calico networking and more."

"There are several areas where Kubernetes could improve."

"Kubernetes' VM functionality and security could be improved."

"It's good for bigger organizations, but for smaller organizations or a few workloads, it may be too heavy, not easy to deploy, and the ROI may be less because it requires a control plane, worker nodes, and multiple VMs to run."

More Kubernetes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

"The price of Kubernetes could be lower. However, it is less expensive than VMware Tanzu. Additionally, technical support is expensive. The overall cost of the solution is approximately $1,000 annually."

"In addition to Kubernetes, you have to pay for support."

"I am using the solution's open-source version."

"If you have a solid AKS and a solid DevOps process, you'll automatically get an ROI, not just in terms of cost but also in how quickly you can see your business application progress."

"You need to pay for a license if you buy branded products. For example, if you take the services from Azure, AWS, or Google, the price of the Kubernetes cluster is inclusive of the service that's being offered to us on a pay-and-use model."

"Kubernetes is open source and is an orchestration platform. It is a cost effective solution and its pricing depends on your company and how you use it"

"Kubernetes is an open-source solution that can be free. We have some distribution with licenses, such OpenShift and Tucows in Amazon. They are billing services."

"Google Kubernetes Engine is free in the simplest setup, AWS Kubernetes Engine costs about $50 (depending on the region), in a three master setup, so it's almost the same as the cost of the EC2 instances and it's totally fine from my point of view."

More Kubernetes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Wellness & Fitness Company

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Komodor?

The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

See all answers

What do you like most about Kubernetes?

There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes?

The pricing depends on the project. Ultimately, it's a business decision, and they need to assess the risks and potential consequences. If the benefits outweigh the costs, then it's a worthwhile in...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kubernetes?

Perhaps there are some aspects related to its operation that could be improved. One thing I noticed is when you have multiple deployments and your node count increases beyond eight or nine, the con...

See all answers

Comparisons

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 52% of the time

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 48% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 34% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Kubernetes

Compared 22% of the time

Google Kubernetes Engine vs Kubernetes

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 6% of the time

More Kubernetes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

October 2024

Download Komodor product report

Buyer's Guide

Kubernetes

October 2024

Download Kubernetes product report

Also Known As

No data available

Learn More

Komodor

Kubernetes

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Kubernetes (K8s) is an open-source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.
It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes builds upon 15 years of experience of running production workloads at Google, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Kubernetes

September 2024

Free Report: Komodor vs. Kubernetes

Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Kubernetes and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Komodor vs. Kubernetes report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.