Komodor vs Kubernetes comparison

Komodor and Kubernetes are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kubernetes is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Komodor holds a 4.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Kubernetes’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Kubernetes users who would recommend it.

Komodor

Read 5 Komodor reviews

1,177 Views
1,177 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kubernetes

Read 78 Kubernetes reviews

2,392 Views
2,368 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Komodor

Kubernetes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Kubernetes and Komodor operate in the realm of container management and troubleshooting. Komodor seems to hold an advantage due to its strong troubleshooting capabilities, despite Kubernetes being more cost-effective.

Features: Kubernetes offers scalability, flexibility, and a strong community support system. It excels in managing complex containerized applications, providing robust orchestration. Komodor, on the other hand, shines with its real-time monitoring, root cause analysis, and the ability to swiftly identify and resolve issues.

Room for Improvement: Kubernetes could improve in deployment simplicity, personalized support, and maintenance requirements. It involves a steep learning curve that requires skilled personnel. Komodor might enhance its pricing model, broaden feature scope beyond troubleshooting, and expand integration capabilities with other platforms or services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kubernetes demands advanced expertise for deployment and maintenance and often involves resource-intensive management. Community-driven support is vast but lacks personalized assistance. Komodor simplifies deployment with a user-friendly setup and offers responsive customer service, facilitating faster resolution times and making it more user-friendly for streamlined operations.

Pricing and ROI: Kubernetes benefits from being open-source, leading to lower direct costs but may incur hidden expenses related to support. Komodor carries additional costs for its tools yet provides significant ROI by reducing downtime and simplifying troubleshooting tasks. This efficiency and time-saving lead to greater ROI, making Komodor a worthwhile investment for managing Kubernetes environments effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Kubernetes Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Kubernetes

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,832 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kubernetes

Ranking in Container Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 4.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kubernetes is 6.2%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kubernetes	6.2%
Komodor	4.0%
Other	89.8%

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources. I am looking forward to using AI-powered troubleshooting workflow that Komodor unrolled recently.

Read full review

Venu Boddu

AWS DevOps Engineer at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Manage infrastructure automation and smooth application deployment with robust auto-scaling capabilities

Kubernetes is highly valuable for its node-based setup, which allows for the running of multiple pods. This feature is essential for infrastructure automation and application deployment. Kubernetes also offers rollback control and auto-scaling capabilities, which are crucial for maintaining an application's availability even if nodes or pods go down. Additionally, Kubernetes supports load balancing to distribute traffic efficiently across multiple pods.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

"All the current features are quite harmonic."

"One of the most valuable features is the thickness of the cloud platform or on-prem file, which makes the solution straightforward to shift and scale. It works well with different types of deployment strategies and networks."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the auto-scaling feature. However, Kubernetes is not used alone; it is part of a complete deployment pipeline integrated with DevOps. This pipeline includes automation and deployment capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Kubernetes is its support for load balancing."

"Kubernetes' most valuable features include scalability and deployment."

"There's a lot of community support if you need to get help."

"This solution provides a comprehensive way to scale up our ports and containers, without having to use multiple products."

"There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled."

More Kubernetes pros

Cons

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"Kubernetes is a complex solution. The product needs to be more manageable and user-friendly."

"There are features in Google Cloud or AWS that aren't in Azure. They need to implement a couple more tools in Azure."

"We would to have additional features related to security within the API, instead of needing to install add-ons."

"The support could be faster at resolving issues."

"It would be useful to have a basic and stable interface for monitoring and quick deployment purposes, especially when the deployments are big like a proof of concept or proof of technology. Currently, you need to use the Kubernetes console for all functionalities. It is not a quick-to-learn product if you are not from a Linux background. You need to be very skilled at Linux to learn it quickly. It took me two to three months because I mostly work with Microsoft products. For people who are not from a Linux background, the learning curve is a little bit longer."

"Kubernetes can be complicated to understand. Improved documentation would help in gaining scalable knowledge and making it more understandable."

"The solution has some issues regarding availability during high loads. Worker nodes are sometimes unavailable, affecting the overall availability of the applications. This is a bug or underlying problem with the tool, and Azure and other providers are looking into improving this by releasing new versions of Kubernetes that fix some of the platform's issues."

"They should make documentation simpler for learning."

More Kubernetes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

"The price of Kubernetes could be lower. However, it is less expensive than VMware Tanzu. Additionally, technical support is expensive. The overall cost of the solution is approximately $1,000 annually."

"If you're using a public cloud, the cost depends on the number of nodes you are planning to deploy Kubernetes on."

"If you have a solid AKS and a solid DevOps process, you'll automatically get an ROI, not just in terms of cost but also in how quickly you can see your business application progress."

"Kubernetes is an open-source solution that can be free. We have some distribution with licenses, such OpenShift and Tucows in Amazon. They are billing services."

"I would say the solution is worth the money, but it depends on the required workloads, the type of workload, and the scaling requirements etc."

"There is no licensing fee."

"The solution itself is open-source, so there is no cost attached to it. However, it requires a virtual machine to operate, which does come at a cost; a choice of a pay as you go model, or a monthly charge via an enterprise agreement. There is a pricing calculator available, where organizations can determine the level and number of virtual machines required, and how much that will cost."

"Kubernetes is open source and is an orchestration platform. It is a cost effective solution and its pricing depends on your company and how you use it"

More Kubernetes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Media Company

Wellness & Fitness Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Komodor?

We are an HR analytics company, and we do a lot of data processing. Our customers send us their HR-related data, and we process it so that we can run analytics on it. We process it on Kubernetes cl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kubernetes?

There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes?

Since we use Kubernetes on-premises, the costs are related to our expertise and the personnel we hire.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kubernetes?

Although we face issues when migrating to new versions of Kubernetes, such as misunderstandings on using new features or integration with proxy services, these issues can be addressed with proper p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 78% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor

Compared 4% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 33% of the time

Portainer vs Kubernetes

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Kubernetes

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Kubernetes

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Kubernetes

Compared 3% of the time

More Kubernetes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

October 2025

Download Komodor product report

Buyer's Guide

Kubernetes

October 2025

Download Kubernetes product report

Also Known As

No data available

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Komodor

Kubernetes (K8s) is an open-source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.
It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes builds upon 15 years of experience of running production workloads at Google, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community.

Kubernetes

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Kubernetes

September 2025

Free Report: Komodor vs. Kubernetes

Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Kubernetes and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Komodor vs. Kubernetes report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.