Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jira vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Jira users report satisfaction with its cost-effectiveness, efficiency improvements, and quick ROI despite plugin challenges and difficulties quantifying ROI.
Sentiment score
7.7
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management improves ROI through streamlined operations, enhanced visibility, and efficient collaboration, benefiting mature companies significantly.
For organizations that haven't invested in people and processes, the product is underutilized and seen as overpriced.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Jira's self-service support is aided by documentation and forums, though response times vary when escalations need direct contact.
Sentiment score
6.8
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management provides effective support with responsive teams, comprehensive resources, and valuable training, despite occasional access challenges.
I did not face any issues with stability or upgrades.
They should improve vendor compliance to align with ServiceNow's strategy.
They have knowledgeable teams across all levels.
Technical support from ServiceNow is good, as the HI ticket system is available for any module, including SPM.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Jira is scalable and integrates well, but flexibility and customizations can impact scalability, affecting cost-effectiveness and performance.
Sentiment score
7.6
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is praised for its scalability and adaptability, effectively managing diverse enterprise needs and user demands.
Scalability is critical for our clients as they deal with numerous projects and changes.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Jira is highly stable, with few issues often linked to user infrastructure, upgrades, or customizations, and cloud stability strong.
Sentiment score
8.2
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is stable and reliable, rated highly by users despite occasional performance and customization issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Jira requires improvement in customization, usability, integration, and performance, while users seek better training resources for seamless experiences.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management needs more intuitive interfaces, better finance integration, cost-efficiency, and improved reporting and AI features.
To improve Jira, maybe some AI features could be added.
The recommended export and import functionality could be developed into a real-time scenario to allow seamless data synchronization without manual interventions.
The integration of artificial intelligence is something my customer is considering for future upgrades.
Making the product more cost-beneficial would help more organizations consider investing in it.
 

Setup Cost

Jira pricing increases with user count and plugins, offering competitive rates but rising costs for larger enterprises.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management's complex pricing is seen as expensive, deterring medium-sized companies despite potential ROI benefits.
If a company is prepared to get a return on the investment, the price is worth it.
The pricing is rated six, as it's relatively low-medium compared to other solutions.
It's a bit costly currently.
 

Valuable Features

Jira is praised for its user-friendly interface, customization, integrations, agile support, and features enhancing productivity and collaboration.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management provides comprehensive, flexible project management with real-time analytics and seamless ITSM integrations for enhanced decision-making.
Aligning the portfolio with overall strategy and goals is essential for success.
The platform consolidates multiple offerings into one module, eliminating the need to invest in siloed applications.
The complete ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management suite is used for strategic alignment, allowing us to track projects, portfolios, costs, and vendors to make informed decisions based on project tasks.
 

Categories and Ranking

Jira
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
275
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (1st), Project Management Software (1st)
ServiceNow Strategic Portfo...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (2nd), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

AmitUbale - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient project management that's comprehensive and and helps with time efficiency
We use Jira primarily for project management within the organization. It helps us manage tasks, bug management, and tracking tickets effectively. We assign tickets to individual team members and track them easily For project management, Jira has helped facilitate efficient task segregation and…
Vishal Savajiani - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective reporting and AI features enhance task tracking
The best feature is the effective reporting system for project portfolio and program management. It allows us to track tasks easily, create cost budgets for individual tasks, and is aligned with AI features. It's a comprehensive strategic project management tool, Agile tool, and business continuity tool. The platform consolidates multiple offerings into one module, eliminating the need to invest in siloed applications.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?
We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.
What do you like most about ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
The pricing is rated six, as it's relatively low-medium compared to other solutions. However, the value isn't fully justified when not all features are used. A pricing model adjustment is needed fo...
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
Based on observations, improvements in ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management could involve enhancing the project workbench, which currently shows every project to any project manager. Restricti...
 

Also Known As

Jira Software
IT Business Management, ServiceNow IT Business Management Suite, ServiceNow ITBM Suite, ServiceNow ITBM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Proximus, UNT SYSTEM, SAP SuccessFactors
Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.