"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
Earn 20 points
Enjoy a free subscription to try it for yourself
JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 1 review while Red Hat Quay is ranked 6th in Container Registry. JFrog Container Registry is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Acts as a central repository and comes with code scanning feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry, whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.