Top 10 Red Hat Quay Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

2 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Red Hat Quay Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Red Hat Quay based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Harbor, JFrog Container Registry, and Amazon ECR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Red Hat Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Red Hat, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Harbor

4.0 out of 5

Harbor

4.0 out of 5

Harbor is an open source container image registry that secures images with role-based access control, scans images for vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted. A CNCF Incubating project, Harbor delivers compliance, performance, and interoperability to help you consistently and securely manage images across cloud native compute platforms like Kubernetes and Docker.

Download Harbor vs. Red Hat Quay Report

Pricing

The cost of the product is free.

View comparison

Pricing

The cost of the product is free.

JFrog Container Registry

3.7 out of 5

JFrog Container Registry

3.7 out of 5

JFrog Container Registry excels in integration with CI/CD tools, making it ideal for complex infrastructures. In comparison, Red Hat Quay is cost-effective, appealing to those seeking efficient security scanning and straightforward deployment. These differences guide tech buyers based on specific needs.

Download JFrog Container Registry vs. Red Hat Quay Report

Pricing

Red Hat Quay often incurs higher setup costs due to its comprehensive features, whereas JFrog Container Registry typically offers a more budget-friendly setup. When comparing setup, Red Hat Quay leans towards enterprises, while JFrog suits cost-conscious projects.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon ECR

4.4 out of 5

Amazon ECR

4.4 out of 5

Amazon ECR excels in scalability and AWS integration, appealing to enterprises needing robust cloud-native solutions. In comparison, Red Hat Quay highlights advanced security features, attracting organizations prioritizing security and compliance while managing containers effectively across diverse environments.

Download Amazon ECR vs. Red Hat Quay Report

Pricing

Amazon ECR has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Red Hat Quay may entail a more complex setup process potentially leading to higher upfront costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon ECR has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Red Hat Quay may entail a more complex setup process potentially leading to higher upfront costs.

Azure Container Registry

4.1 out of 5

Azure Container Registry

4.1 out of 5

Azure Container Registry integrates seamlessly with Microsoft services, offering security and scalability. In comparison, Red Hat Quay excels in access control and supports multiple architectures. A tech buyer might want Azure for Azure integration, while Quay appeals through flexibility and rich features.

Download Azure Container Registry vs. Red Hat Quay Report

Pricing

Azure Container Registry offers low setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Red Hat Quay involves higher initial expenses, potentially benefiting those seeking premium features.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Container Registry offers low setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Red Hat Quay involves higher initial expenses, potentially benefiting those seeking premium features.

VMware Harbor Registry

4.5 out of 5

VMware Harbor Registry

4.5 out of 5

VMware Harbor Registry is an enterprise-class registry server that stores and distributes container images. Harbor allows you to store and manage images for use with Enterprise Pivotal Container Service (Enterprise PKS).

View comparison

Related categories

Container Registry