We compared Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In summary, the main differences between Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry are highlighted by user reviews. Users appreciate Amazon ECR for its seamless integration with AWS services, robust security measures, and cost-effectiveness. On the other hand, JFrog Container Registry is praised for its user-friendly interface, efficient image management, and excellent customer service. However, both products have room for improvement in terms of usability, documentation, and image updating processes.
Features: Amazon ECR stands out with its seamless integration with AWS services, strong security and access control, reliable and scalable infrastructure, easy image management and deployment, and excellent support. Meanwhile, JFrog Container Registry is appreciated for its seamless integration, efficient image management, robust security, user-friendly interface, and reliable support.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR setup cost is minimal and easy to handle, with a transparent pricing structure and straightforward licensing process. On the other hand, JFrog Container Registry offers reasonable pricing, hassle-free setup cost, and flexible licensing., The ROI for Amazon ECR seems positive as users have found it beneficial in terms of operational efficiency and cost savings. JFrog Container Registry has been praised for its profitability and cost-effectiveness, leading to significant financial gains.
Room for Improvement: Users have identified room for improvement in both Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry. Amazon ECR needs a more user-friendly interface and better documentation, while JFrog Container Registry requires enhanced usability and improved search functionality.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, the duration to establish a new tech solution differs between Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry. Users report varying timeframes for deployment, setup, and implementation, highlighting differences in the products' efficiency and ease of use., Amazon ECR's customer service is highly regarded, with customers appreciating its helpful and prompt support. JFrog Container Registry's customer service is also highly appreciated, with praise for its excellent assistance and willingness to go above and beyond. Both provide reliable and professional experiences.
The summary above is based on 7 interviews we conducted recently with Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."
"One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utilizing load balancers via AWS features allows us to manage all traffic."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."
"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."
"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."
"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."
"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."
"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."
"Amazon ECR's manipulation capability of tags needs to be improved."
"Its support for system architecture needs improvement."
"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."
"Improving the documentation for easy understanding will help bring in more clients to use Amazon ECR."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
Amazon ECR is ranked 1st in Container Registry with 7 reviews while JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 1 review. Amazon ECR is rated 9.6, while JFrog Container Registry is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon ECR writes "Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Acts as a central repository and comes with code scanning feature ". Amazon ECR is most compared with Azure Container Registry, Harbor, Google Container Registry, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and DigitalOcean Container Registry, whereas JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Azure Container Registry, Red Hat Quay and VMware Harbor Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
