We compared JFrog Container Registry and Harbor based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
JFrog Container Registry stands out for its seamless integration, robust security, and excellent customer service. Users praise its support team and pricing transparency but highlight the need for better usability and documentation. On the other hand, Harbor is valued for its efficient storage, security, and user-friendly interface. Both platforms show a positive ROI but differ in setup time, licensing, and customer service support.
Features: JFrog Container Registry offers seamless integration, efficient image management, robust security, user-friendly interface, and reliable support. Harbor emphasizes efficient and secure storage, integration with other tools, user-friendly interface, and emphasizes security and compliance.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for JFrog Container Registry is described as straightforward and hassle-free, with reasonable and transparent pricing. In comparison, Harbor also has minimal setup cost and its pricing is considered fair and transparent, with simple and hassle-free licensing., JFrog Container Registry generates profitable ROI by enhancing return on investment. It is cost-effective, leading to financial gains. Harbor also provides significant returns on investments, proving its profitability.
Room for Improvement: JFrog Container Registry has room for improvement in terms of usability, user interface, navigation, search functionality, filtering options, documentation, and tutorials. Harbor also has areas that require enhancement.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews highlight that the duration to establish a new tech solution with JFrog Container Registry varies greatly between users, with some taking three months for deployment and a week for setup, while others only taking a week for both. In comparison, Harbor also shows variation, with some users taking three months for deployment and a week for setup, while others only taking a week for both. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the context in which these terms are used to determine the actual required timeframe., JFrog Container Registry's customer service is regarded as excellent, with prompt and helpful responses and expertise in resolving issues. Harbor's customer service is highly praised for providing assistance and help to users.
The summary above is based on 1 interviews we conducted recently with JFrog Container Registry and Harbor users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Right now this is the leading product in this category."
"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."
"The product should integrate better with other storage options."
"The GUI needs to improve."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."
Earn 20 points
Harbor is ranked 2nd in Container Registry while JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 2 reviews. Harbor is rated 7.0, while JFrog Container Registry is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Harbor writes "Check document vulnerabilities with this cloud-native product that needs to improve in ease-of-use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Acts as a central repository and comes with code scanning feature ". Harbor is most compared with Red Hat Quay, Azure Container Registry, Amazon ECR, VMware Harbor Registry and DigitalOcean Container Registry, whereas JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Red Hat Quay and VMware Harbor Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
