"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"It should be easier to use. It can have more graphical interfaces to manage containers. At present, the handling or management of the containers is very basic."
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."
"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
Azure Container Registry is ranked 2nd in Container Registry with 4 reviews while Red Hat Quay is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 1 review. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Easy to use, private, secure, and it performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry, whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, JFrog Container Registry, VMware Harbor Registry and Amazon ECR.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
