Azure Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay comparison

Azure Container Registry and Red Hat Quay are competing products in the container management space. Azure Container Registry seems to have the upper hand in pricing and integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, while Red Hat Quay is favored for its advanced security features and management capabilities.

Features: Azure Container Registry provides tight integration with Azure services, automated container builds, and base image updates. Red Hat Quay offers image vulnerability scanning, image lifecycle management, and a strong focus on security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Container Registry benefits from simplified deployment and robust support through Azure's customer service channels, making it efficient for organizations already using Azure services. Red Hat Quay requires more initial deployment effort but offers cloud and on-premises flexibility along with specialized support services suited for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Container Registry offers competitive pricing and high ROI, particularly for Azure service users, by providing integrated access and scalability features. Red Hat Quay may require a higher initial investment but potentially delivers better long-term ROI through its management features and security focus.