Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Microsoft and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while JFrog is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.4. Microsoft holds a 11.2% mindshare in CR, compared to JFrog’s 30.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of JFrog users who would recommend it.
Azure Container Registry
Read 20 Azure Container Registry reviews
  • 2,716 Views
  • 2,106 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
JFrog Container Registry
Read 5 JFrog Container Registry reviews
  • 6,100 Views
  • 5,754 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Azure Container Registry and JFrog Container Registry compete in the container image management category. Azure Container Registry has the upper hand with its seamless integration with Azure services and flexible pricing.

Features: Azure Container Registry offers seamless connectivity with Azure Kubernetes services, geo-replication capabilities, and flexibility in managing both Windows and Linux containers. JFrog Container Registry is noted for its comprehensive code scanning, multi-cloud support, and integration with JFrog Xray.

Room for Improvement: Azure Container Registry needs better deployment speed, a more intuitive interface, and improved image vulnerability scanning. JFrog Container Registry requires enhanced documentation, an optimized cost structure, and advanced security features like improved vulnerability scanning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Container Registry is deployed mainly in public and private clouds with varying customer service levels. JFrog Container Registry supports hybrid clouds with effective customer service and responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Container Registry offers competitive pricing with flexible tier options, while JFrog Container Registry is seen as expensive with complex licensing but offers valuable ROI through operational efficiencies and robust multi-cloud features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Container Registry
Ranking in Container Registry
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JFrog Container Registry
Ranking in Container Registry
1st
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Azure Container Registry is 11.2%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Container Registry is 30.7%, up from 27.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry
 

Featured Reviews

Chris Badenhorst - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers horizontal scaling and auto-scaling capabilities
We are a Microsoft partner with solutions designations and specializations in Azure. We have about one thousand customers running on Azure, to whom we provide managed services through our local Microsoft arrangement in EMEA. We do have extensive experience in Azure networking, infrastructure platforms, and data analytics. We have three teams covering application and data analytics, storage configuration, networking, public endpoints, and the like. We manage Service Fabric for two customers. We have more experience with Service Fabric than pure containers on AKS or IPS.
Read full review
Sai Balaji Bonagiri - PeerSpot reviewer
Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns
In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started. However, once you gain some experience, working with JFrog becomes much easier. Overall, it's manageable for beginners, but there might be a bit of a learning curve. I'd call myself an intermediate user.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"We like the fact that this is a secure solution, that employs a token-based system, which can be used to manage all the applications under this product."
"What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft."
More Azure Container Registry pros
"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."
"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."
"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
 

Cons

"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."
"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."
"The solution has no areas that need improvement."
"The building of images on the container is quite cumbersome."
"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."
"They can improve their scalability."
"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."
"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
More Azure Container Registry cons
"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."
"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is competitively priced."
"I have no information on how much Azure Container Registry costs. I know it's the only solution my institution can use, so the cost was approved."
"The Premium version includes some enhancements but is still quite okay with regard to pricing."
"I would rate the pricing four out of ten."
"Azure is a bit expensive."
"When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."
"Azure Container Registry, has no cost, but you pay for storage service."
"The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."
"JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."
"The solution is expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Container Registry?
Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Container Registry?
The pricing is on the lower side and not costly. Customers usually pay approximately $500 USD monthly, though this includes multiple services, not just the Azure Container Registry.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Container Registry?
While downtime is uncommon, there are occasional server errors like '404 not found' and '504 server not found'. Viewing server logs is not a reliable approach, and improving log visibility would he...
See all answers
What do you like most about JFrog Container Registry?
It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Container Registry?
JFrog pricing includes self-hosted and cloud options, with costs based on licenses, subscriptions, number of nodes, and repository limits. Licensing costs are $3 per year, which I feel is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with JFrog Container Registry?
Areas of improvement include advanced security integration that should go beyond basic vulnerability scanning. More documentation about policies, X-rays, and download triggers, along with integrati...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Amazon ECR vs Azure Container Registry
Compared 48% of the time
Harbor vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Harbor vs Azure Container Registry
Compared 18% of the time
Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Red Hat Quay vs Azure Container Registry
Compared 2% of the time
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Azure Container Registry
Compared 1% of the time
More Azure Container Registry Competitors
Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry
Compared 53% of the time
Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry
Compared 25% of the time
Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry
Compared 8% of the time
VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry
Compared 2% of the time
More JFrog Container Registry Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Container Registry
June 2025
Azure Container Registry reportDownload Azure Container Registry product report
Buyer's Guide
JFrog Container Registry
June 2025
JFrog Container Registry reportDownload JFrog Container Registry product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Container Registry
No data available
 

Overview

Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.

Microsoft

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

JFrog
 

Sample Customers

DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra
Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard
Buyer's Guide
Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry
June 2025
Free Report: Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry report.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.