We performed a comparison between Amazon ECR and Red Hat Quay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."
"One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utilizing load balancers via AWS features allows us to manage all traffic."
"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."
"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."
"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
"Improving the documentation for easy understanding will help bring in more clients to use Amazon ECR."
"Amazon ECR's manipulation capability of tags needs to be improved."
"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."
"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."
"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."
"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."
"Its support for system architecture needs improvement."
"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
Earn 20 points
Amazon ECR is ranked 1st in Container Registry with 7 reviews while Red Hat Quay is ranked 6th in Container Registry. Amazon ECR is rated 9.6, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon ECR writes "Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". Amazon ECR is most compared with JFrog Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Harbor, Google Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, JFrog Container Registry, Azure Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
