Red Hat Quay and Harbor compete in the container registry space. Harbor often has the upper hand due to its advanced features and interoperability.
Features: Red Hat Quay offers enhanced security features such as image vulnerability scanning, detailed repository management, and robust role-based access controls. Harbor's strengths lie in interoperability, including native support for various authentication systems, adaptability across infrastructures, and extensive integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Quay offers a straightforward deployment process supported by comprehensive documentation and reliable customer service. Harbor provides a flexible deployment model for diverse environments like Kubernetes, requiring more initial configuration effort. Its community support is active but lacks personalized service levels similar to Red Hat Quay.
Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Quay appeals with its all-inclusive pricing model that minimizes unpredictable expenses, potentially enhancing ROI. Harbor, being open-source, has a lower initial setup cost but may incur additional expenses for custom support and extended features. However, its comprehensive feature set can lead to higher long-term ROI.
Harbor is an open source container image registry that secures images with role-based access control, scans images for vulnerabilities, and signs images as trusted. A CNCF Incubating project, Harbor delivers compliance, performance, and interoperability to help you consistently and securely manage images across cloud native compute platforms like Kubernetes and Docker.
Red Hat Quay is a private container registry that stores, builds, and deploys container images. It analyzes your images for security vulnerabilities, identifying potential issues that can help you mitigate security risks.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
