Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Red Hat Quay vs VMware Harbor Registry comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Quay
Ranking in Container Registry
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Harbor Registry
Ranking in Container Registry
7th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Red Hat Quay is 8.0%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Harbor Registry is 1.6%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat Quay8.0%
VMware Harbor Registry1.6%
Other90.4%
Container Registry
 

Featured Reviews

Marieswaran M - PeerSpot reviewer
Has allowed me to build and deploy containerized applications consistently by integrating automated image updates and CI/CD workflows
The features of Red Hat Quay that I have found most valuable include the ability to switch between the previous version and the newer version; this is an extra feature currently added, and I appreciate this feature. Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images. It's very convenient, and it automatically stores my images to deploy in the OpenShift application, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting. The positive impacts I have seen from using Red Hat Quay include the ability to change to a newer version and roll back to the older version. This is the only feature I find beneficial, and I can monitor how many people download my images, which I can verify with the analytics provided. The value of geo-replication in maintaining consistent access to container images is significant since I store data in MongoDB and use the Apache Web Server application running in Quay.io, where I store my images.
SS
Effortless setup and comprehensive image scanning enhance project efficiency with minimal manual intervention
The challenge I encountered while using the VMware Harbor Registry is that sometimes the default credentials get overwritten, so we have to restart Harbor to make it function as before. The default credential rewrite is one of the major pains with Harbor, so this has to be improved. They can expand more into the known issue section and support for the older versions. We did check the documentation as well as some of the issues mentioned in GitHub, but they weren't that useful.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Things like downloading an image, pulling an image, tagging, and pushing it back to the needed organization are fairly easy compared to doing things through the command-line interface."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
"Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting."
"It is very convenient to automate consistently deploying it to a Kubernetes environment to see how it performs."
 

Cons

"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
"Nothing is happening regarding AI. I don’t see the role of AI currently."
"I think Red Hat Quay could improve the security, as users can download the images without a login."
"The image scanning in VMware Harbor Registry is quite limited compared to other specialized image scanning tools."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Retailer
10%
Transportation Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Red Hat Quay?
I think Red Hat Quay could improve the security, as users can download the images without a login. This is the only problem, so we need to enhance the security.
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Quay?
I am an end-user of Red Hat Quay, having just used it for one more year, and I haven't found any issues. I use this to store my images to share with my colleagues, and I store multiple applications...
What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Quay?
I have not used the image vulnerability scanning feature of Red Hat Quay yet; I'm going to learn about this. Regarding geo-replication in maintaining consistent access to container images, I have f...
What needs improvement with VMware Harbor Registry?
I never determined the accuracy of the scanning because I did not utilize this feature. Unfortunately, I have limited experience as I have only helped utilize from a client's platform that installe...
What is your primary use case for VMware Harbor Registry?
I am mainly deploying pilot applications in my region where many applications are more traditional and have normally used traditional frameworks. Because of this, they want to implement containeriz...
 

Also Known As

No data available
VMware Harbor
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH
360 Total Security, OVHcloud, TalkingData, Trend Micro
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Quay vs. VMware Harbor Registry and other solutions. Updated: October 2025.
872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.