Invicti vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

The compared Invicti and Tenable solutions aren't in the same category. Invicti is ranked #5 in DAST , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 7.9% mindshare in the category. Tenable is ranked #15 in AS , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

3,137 Views
690 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,996 Views
1,597 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Invicti

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in web application security. Tenable.io appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and market value, while Invicti stands out for pricing and support.

Features: Invicti is known for intuitive vulnerability detection, effective integration capabilities, and user-friendly interface. Tenable.io is recognized for extensive scanning coverage, detailed reporting, and a rich set of features conducive to diverse security assessments.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could enhance scalability, improve dashboard customization, and broaden scan depth. Tenable.io users point out the need for faster scan speeds, reduction in false positives, and simplified user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti provides a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support. Tenable.io, though robust, poses challenges with configuration complexity but benefits from highly-rated support.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti offers a favorable pricing model that aligns with swift ROI. Tenable.io, while a significant investment, is perceived as justified by the long-term benefits of its extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Container Security (25th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (9th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

Invicti and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Invicti is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 7.9%, up 5.3% compared to last year.
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 1.2% since last year.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Invicti	7.9%
Veracode	19.4%
Checkmarx One	17.2%
Other	55.5%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.4%
SonarQube	17.9%
Checkmarx One	10.2%
Other	70.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Jonathan-Pereira

Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized license management transforms asset manipulation based on functions and improves security posture

Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions. It provides a centralized view from end-to-end to its assets' identities and vulnerabilities. One of the greatest features is Kubernetes. The automated scanning capability is pretty standard in the market, and Tenable's prioritization engine helps improve the security posture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Netsparker provides a more interactive interface that is more appealing."

"Scan, proxify the application, and then detailed report along with evidence and remediations to problems."

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."

"The scanner and the result generator are valuable features for us."

"This tool is really fast and the information that they provide on vulnerabilities is pretty good."

"It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

More Invicti pros

"It is fully automated."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"Invicti takes too long with big applications, and there are issues with the login portal."

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

More Invicti cons

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"The technical support needs improvement. Currently, it takes time, which might be due to the free version, but providing some level of support could encourage future purchase decisions."

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

"We have encountered some problems with the technical support from Tenable; I would rate it a five out of ten. It is not efficacious, especially the first-level support."

"The report customization needs to be better."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"The pricing is okay."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

The main concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I use Invicti for web application testing and API testing. I want to confirm that I am still using Invicti and SonarQube.

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 16% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

December 2025

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

No data available

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

October 2024

Free Report: Invicti vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.