Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Invicti and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Tenable is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Invicti holds a 2.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 38 Acunetix reviews

6,206 Views
2,979 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,996 Views
1,597 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are key players in web application security, competing closely in several categories. Tenable.io often has the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities, though Acunetix offers competitive pricing attracting budget-conscious users.

Features: Acunetix is recognized for its comprehensive detection capabilities, intuitive setup, and strong focus on user experience. Tenable.io offers advanced threat intelligence, seamless integration with multiple platforms, and a wide range of features that keep it ahead in terms of functionality.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix users highlight the need for better customizability, enhanced reporting features, and expanded integration capabilities. Tenable.io faces feedback about scanning performance, documentation detail, and ease of use during scans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is praised for straightforward deployment and effective customer support. Tenable.io, while offering detailed deployment options, can be complex during the initial setup but matches Acunetix in customer service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix stands out with competitive pricing and considerable ROI, appealing to cost-sensitive users. Tenable.io delivers stronger features and integrations that justify its higher price point, which users equate to significant ROI when utilizing its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,315 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Vulnerability Management (19th), DevSecOps (6th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Acunetix	2.3%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.4%
Other	96.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Jonathan-Pereira

Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized license management transforms asset manipulation based on functions and improves security posture

Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions. It provides a centralized view from end-to-end to its assets' identities and vulnerabilities. One of the greatest features is Kubernetes. The automated scanning capability is pretty standard in the market, and Tenable's prioritization engine helps improve the security posture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program."

"Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments, allowing good dashboard visualization that can be reported easily to management, providing complete visibility on vulnerability metrics."

"The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

More Acunetix pros

"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."

"It is fully automated."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"I think Acunetix needs improvement since it is now working with Invicti, so the price list will need to be reconsidered."

"I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution."

"I think currently on full scans of large apps, Acunetix takes time, so it can improve the timing part."

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

"I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution."

More Acunetix cons

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"The pricing is okay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

My main use case for Acunetix is providing a vulnerability scanner for our web application server. I use Acunetix to scan our web security and discover vulnerabilities so we can patch these vulnera...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

My advice to others looking into using Acunetix is that it is really helpful to discover the web attacks and have great, powerful reporting so you can have reduced incidents to look at. I have rate...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

If there were a solution, I would like to see automation and an integrated remediation solution for vulnerability or patch management.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I do not understand what API approach means; I do not understand this term. I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment. My review rating for this pro...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 14% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

January 2026

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

December 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.