Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Invicti and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Tenable is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Invicti holds a 2.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 38 Acunetix reviews

6,206 Views
2,979 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,996 Views
1,597 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are key players in web application security, competing closely in several categories. Tenable.io often has the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities, though Acunetix offers competitive pricing attracting budget-conscious users.

Features: Acunetix is recognized for its comprehensive detection capabilities, intuitive setup, and strong focus on user experience. Tenable.io offers advanced threat intelligence, seamless integration with multiple platforms, and a wide range of features that keep it ahead in terms of functionality.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix users highlight the need for better customizability, enhanced reporting features, and expanded integration capabilities. Tenable.io faces feedback about scanning performance, documentation detail, and ease of use during scans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is praised for straightforward deployment and effective customer support. Tenable.io, while offering detailed deployment options, can be complex during the initial setup but matches Acunetix in customer service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix stands out with competitive pricing and considerable ROI, appealing to cost-sensitive users. Tenable.io delivers stronger features and integrations that justify its higher price point, which users equate to significant ROI when utilizing its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,315 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Vulnerability Management (19th), DevSecOps (6th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Acunetix	2.3%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.4%
Other	96.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Jonathan-Pereira

Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized license management transforms asset manipulation based on functions and improves security posture

Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions. It provides a centralized view from end-to-end to its assets' identities and vulnerabilities. One of the greatest features is Kubernetes. The automated scanning capability is pretty standard in the market, and Tenable's prioritization engine helps improve the security posture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have."

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"Picks up weaknesses in our app setups."

"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

More Acunetix pros

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

"The solution is stable."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"Improving the handling of false positives would be beneficial because it can be challenging to trust the findings flagged by Acunetix, and those findings must be manually validated."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"Acunetix may need to reconsider the cost or price compared to other vendors."

"I rate its stability six out of ten."

"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."

"We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version."

More Acunetix cons

"The market is standard for vulnerability scanning, however, the posture can be improved through Tenable's prioritization engine."

"The technical support needs improvement. Currently, it takes time, which might be due to the free version, but providing some level of support could encourage future purchase decisions."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

"The report customization needs to be better."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"The solution is expensive."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"The pricing is okay."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

My main use case for Acunetix is providing a vulnerability scanner for our web application server. I use Acunetix to scan our web security and discover vulnerabilities so we can patch these vulnera...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

My advice to others looking into using Acunetix is that it is really helpful to discover the web attacks and have great, powerful reporting so you can have reduced incidents to look at. I have rate...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

If there were a solution, I would like to see automation and an integrated remediation solution for vulnerability or patch management.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I do not understand what API approach means; I do not understand this term. I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment. My review rating for this pro...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 14% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

January 2026

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

December 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.