Invicti Web + API vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tenable is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.5. Invicti holds a 2.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Invicti Web + API

Read 36 Invicti Web + API reviews

12,369 Views
5,937 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

3,748 Views
3,148 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Invicti Web + API

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Acunetix and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are competitors in the web security solutions market. Acunetix appears to have the upper hand due to its user-friendliness and comprehensive vulnerability detection capabilities, although Tenable.io excels in compliance and prioritization features.

Features: Acunetix provides efficient vulnerability scanning and generates PCI DSS-compliant reports quickly, benefiting application teams. It features easy initial setup and high-speed scanning to identify vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. CI/CD integration, scalability, and flexible deployment enhance its usability. Tenable.io, noted for its cloud integration, scans across web applications and data sources. It offers automated scanning that provides insights without business disruption, prioritizing vulnerabilities for effective risk management.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could improve by reducing false positives, enhancing pricing structures, and expanding report customization. Challenges include handling complex authentication flows and improving adaptive API discovery. Tenable.io should focus on improving its user interface and increasing report customization functionality. It also faces integration issues and needs enhanced dashboard capabilities for better control over scans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports deployment across on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments, with strong customer service and technical support noted for responsiveness. Its integration with other security tools and frequent updates ensures user satisfaction. Tenable.io, primarily cloud-focused, offers dependable technical assistance but has somewhat limited on-premises deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix pricing is relatively high, which may restrict smaller organizations, but it delivers substantial ROI through reduced man-days and enhanced security. Customers find its pricing reasonable compared to competitors, achieving ROI through better application security. Tenable.io has market-standard pricing perceived as expensive for small businesses. Its licensing, based on user numbers and IP addresses, may require more pricing transparency. Both solutions offer tangible ROI by improving vulnerability management and security postures.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti Web + API vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,169 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti Web + API

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (7th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Invicti Web + API is 2.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti Web + API	2.4%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.2%
Other	96.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Hatem Langar

Security Analyst at TOPNET

Web audits have identified vulnerabilities and now provide clear visibility into compliance gaps

We have experience with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, and we use it as well; we have approximately ten licenses for web application scanning. We use it to find vulnerabilities, but Tenable.io Web Application Scanning does not include remediation; we remediate with other products. We use the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"It has been able to find some vulnerabilities, and we've been able to remediate our websites and vulnerabilities, thanks to Acunetix."

"The solution is comprehensive and easy to use."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"Segregation of reports is really, really good with Acunetix; it provides us with a lot of in-depth details."

"Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments, allowing good dashboard visualization that can be reported easily to management, providing complete visibility on vulnerability metrics."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"The product is really easy to use."

More Invicti Web + API pros

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"However, it doesn't seem very helpful or useful for scanning web services, and that has what I feel that the organization could work better on that."

"The time to fix issues is not too quick, so in the case of time-restricted projects for some customers, this might become a problem."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution."

"Acunetix provides the benefit of saving time for an end user. I would not say it saves money because the cost and license of Acunetix is far more than what others offer."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"Our experience with Acunetix has not been good, so we are in the process of switching solutions."

More Invicti Web + API cons

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"We have encountered some problems with the technical support from Tenable; I would rate it a five out of ten. It is not efficacious, especially the first-level support."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

More Invicti Web + API pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is okay."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

If there were a solution, I would like to see automation and an integrated remediation solution for vulnerability or patch management.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I do not understand what API approach means; I do not understand this term. I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment. My review rating for this pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I think the price is expensive. We do not have an idea of how much we have to pay approximately, but comparing to other products, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Invicti vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Web + API Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

Reflectiz vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 4% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API

October 2026

Download Invicti Web + API product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.

Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.

What features make Acunetix stand out?

Rapid Scanning: Delivers fast and comprehensive security assessments.
User-Friendliness: Intuitive interface simplifies operations for diverse teams.
Detailed Reporting: Automated reports enhance vulnerability management.
High Accuracy: Detects vulnerabilities with minimal false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration supports continuous development processes.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating?

Vulnerability Detection: Critical for identifying potential security threats efficiently.
Flexibility: Supports both cloud and on-premises environments.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting standards like PCI DSS.
Scalability: Capable of handling large-scale web applications.

Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.

Invicti

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning delivers automated scanning and robust risk mitigation for diverse cloud environments, prioritizing security and compliance for modern organizations.

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning leverages scalable architecture for comprehensive vulnerability detection across applications and systems. It integrates with cloud services, providing an interface to analyze complex functions and enhance security. Detailed reports guide vulnerability management and ensure compliance with key standards.

What are the critical features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Priority Ratings: Streamlines risk assessment by ranking vulnerabilities based on severity.
Automated Scanning: Simplifies continuous security checks across environments.
Scalable Architecture: Ensures adaptability across expansive networks.
Cloud Integration: Supports various cloud platforms for consistent security.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights into vulnerabilities and risk mitigation measures.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens defenses with thorough vulnerability analysis.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates adherence to OWASP Top 10 and NISC standards.
Streamlined Management: Simplifies processes with a cloud-based approach.
Insightful Dashboards: Provides easy access to important security metrics.

Organizations across industries employ Tenable.io Web Application Scanning for routine vulnerability assessments, safeguarding container exposure, internal networks, and more. Dashboards and reports aid in informed decision-making, supporting comprehensive threat detection and compliance.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

September 2026

Free Report: Invicti Web + API vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti Web + API vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti Web + API vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.