Invicti and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing compete in the application security testing market. Invicti often holds the upper hand due to its pricing and ease of use, while OpenText is favored for its robust feature set that justifies its cost for many organizations.
Features: Invicti is known for its powerful automation capabilities, making security testing and reporting streamlined and efficient. It offers ease of integration and a user-friendly interface catering to security teams needing quick deployment and operation. OpenText provides extensive vulnerability detection and supports a wide range of development environments, crucial for enterprises seeking comprehensive security coverage. It offers a detailed vulnerability management system, integration with existing security infrastructures, and customizable scanning policies.
Room for Improvement: Invicti could enhance its performance as full scans can take considerable time and resources. The user interface, while intuitive, can benefit from additional customization options. Improvement in false-positive management would further streamline its efficiency. OpenText's deployment complexity requires simplification to reduce the initial learning curve and setup time. Cost-efficiency could be enhanced by offering more flexible pricing models. The reporting system, although detailed, would benefit from improved user accessibility and customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is praised for its straightforward deployment process, requiring less time and resources, and offers responsive customer service support for quick troubleshooting. OpenText offers a more complex deployment process, accompanied by comprehensive support for large-scale implementations. Its detailed guidance aims to help navigate the complex setup, though it requires significant initial effort compared to Invicti’s simplicity.
Pricing and ROI: Invicti is generally viewed as cost-effective, providing significant ROI through its efficient processes and affordable implementation costs. It allows for quick returns owing to low initial expenses. OpenText, while having a higher initial cost, offers expansive features that many organizations find justifies the investment over time, particularly for those needing a high-value proposition with comprehensive coverage.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 17.9% |
| Invicti | 12.0% |
| Other | 70.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
