OpenText Core Application Security and Invicti compete in the application security category, both offering detailed vulnerability assessments. Invicti seems to have the upper hand due to its unique proof-based scanning and better integration with DevOps, which reduces false positives and enhances vulnerability management.
Features: OpenText Core provides centralized program management, a robust client portal for real-time status updates, and comprehensive integration capabilities. Invicti offers proof-based scanning technology, seamless DevOps integration, and a strong focus on reducing false positives.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Core could improve reporting visuals, response times for high-severity issues, and integration with bug tracking systems. Invicti can enhance by reducing scanning times, refining its licensing model, and improving scalability and security tool integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core supports on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments, offering flexibility but has gaps in technical expertise impact service quality. Invicti also offers flexible deployment with mixed feedback on support responsiveness and integration processes.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core's pricing is high but justified by comprehensive features, seen as cost-effective for continuous use with suggestions for more flexible subscription models. Invicti's pricing is perceived as expensive for SMBs but offers flexible licensing and is valued for enhancing security posture and providing strong ROI.
Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
