GitHub Advanced Security vs OpenText Core Application Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GitHub and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8. GitHub holds a 2.0% mindshare in AS, compared to OpenText’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,323 Views
7,250 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Application S...

Read 64 OpenText Core Application Security reviews

13,745 Views
10,309 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

OpenText Core Application S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Core Application Security and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the application security space. OpenText appears to have an edge with broader integration support, whereas GitHub's strength lies in its seamless experience for GitHub-centric workflows.

Features: OpenText Core Application Security offers vulnerability scanning and integration with various security tools, providing comprehensive dashboards that offer insights into code vulnerabilities and their criticalities. It excels in identifying security oversights like API access tokens left in source code and integrates seamlessly with the DevOps lifecycle. GitHub Advanced Security offers tight integration within the GitHub ecosystem, featuring CodeQL for customizable security queries and an intuitive developer-centric experience that is beneficial in a consistent development environment.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Application Security users have pointed out high rates of false positives and insufficient scan speeds and native support for some programming languages. It also requires better third-party integrations within CI/CD pipelines. GitHub Advanced Security faces issues with complex query customizations and high pricing that can hinder scalability for larger teams. Its centralized dashboard needs to offer more detailed and intuitive reporting to compete with other comprehensive solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Application Security is compatible across on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments, offering flexibility but receiving criticism for inconsistent technical support. GitHub Advanced Security is user-friendly within its ecosystem but limited to GitHub environments. While users appreciate its satisfactory support, they also highlight the need for better technical assistance post-integration.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Application Security is costly with complex licensing models yet is often considered a justified investment for its features. It can lead to operational time savings but remains expensive for limited use. GitHub Advanced Security shares these pricing challenges, with significant costs per developer. Many seek pricing adjustments to better support team scaling. Both offer a significant ROI by reducing security incidents and enhancing security postures.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Core Application S...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 2.0%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.5%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Application Security	3.5%
GitHub Advanced Security	2.0%
Other	94.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Devendiran Kandan

DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.

Read full review

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration

If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

"Fortify is effective in identifying such oversights, making it a really helpful tool despite its problems."

"It has saved us a lot of time as we focus primarily on programming rather than tool operational work."

"It improves future security scans."

"The UL is easy to use compared to that of other tools, and it is highly reliable. The findings provide a lower number of false positives."

"The vulnerability detection and scanning are awesome features."

"The source code analyzer is the most effective for identifying security vulnerabilities."

"If somebody wants to shift left or integrate security early on in the CI/CD pipeline from a DevOps standpoint, this is probably one of the best tools available."

"Secure code is an important part of our day-to-day development activities, so having code out there gives us some reasonable assurance that it is not vulnerable or open to attack, and it certainly makes our overall risk posture better."

More OpenText Core Application Security pros

Cons

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."

"The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities."

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"The report limitations are the main issue."

"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

"If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much."

"If you're a beginner, give Fortify a go. If you're a professional, it might be worth looking at other tools because Fortify does have limitations when it comes to scalability and executable codes."

"There are frequent complaints about false positives from Fortify."

"The thing that could be improved is reducing the cost of usage and including some of the most pricey features, such as dynamic analysis and that sort of functionality, which makes the difference between different types of tools."

"There were some regulated compliances, which were not there, but these were the factors because of which we had to use some instances of other tools as well."

"It's still a little bit too complex for regular developers."

"New technologies and DevOps could be improved. Fortify on Demand can be slow (slower than other vendors) to support new technologies or new software versions."

"There's a bit of a learning curve. Our development team is struggling with following the rules and following the new processes."

More OpenText Core Application Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is cost-effective."

"We used the one-time application, Security Scan Dynamic. I believe the original fee was $8,000."

"Despite being on the higher end in terms of cost, the biggest value lies in its abilities, including robust features, seamless integration, and high-quality findings."

"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."

"It is quite expensive. Pricing and the licensing model could be improved."

"Buying a license would be feasible for regular use. For intermittent use, the cloud-based option can be used (Fortify on Demand)."

"The pricing model it's based on how many applications you wish to scan."

"I'd rate it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?

Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

Areas for improvement should be contextualized post the OpenText acquisition, but back when I was working with Micro Focus, they focused heavily on enterprise-centric solutions. Now, after the acqu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

For OpenText Core Application Security, I currently support a couple of my clients who are using Fortify on Demand for their web application, CRM, and sales platform. Many good features of Fortify ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

I use Fortify on Demand for monitoring up to a certain extent; it provides monitoring and helps analyze and identify issues that could propagate in the application. When used in conjunction with Ar...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 12% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 29% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

October 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security

October 2026

OpenText Core Application Security report

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

Overview

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security

November 2026

Free Report: GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.