Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub Advanced Security vs OpenText Core Application Security comparison

GitHub and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. GitHub holds a 3.9% mindshare in AS, compared to OpenText’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
GitHub Advanced Security
Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews
  • 7,051 Views
  • 7,051 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
OpenText Core Application S...
Read 64 OpenText Core Application Security reviews
  • 6,712 Views
  • 4,967 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Core Application Security and GitHub Advanced Security are notable tools within the application security category. GitHub Advanced Security appears to have an advantage in user satisfaction due to its seamless integration with GitHub and ease of use for developers.

Features: OpenText Core Application Security is recognized for comprehensive scanning capabilities, including HIPAA compliance, strict priority guidance, SAST, DAST, and central management features, making it ideal for expert-reviewed static and dynamic testing results. GitHub Advanced Security provides seamless integration in the development process, offering security scans, dependency checks, real-time threat protection, and customizable queries with CodeQL.

Room for Improvement: Users of OpenText Core Application Security desire better integration with incident management systems, fewer false positives, faster scan times, and improved new technology support. GitHub Advanced Security requires enhancements in query customization, reporting features, and programming language support, with noted complexities in deployment processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Application Security provides flexible deployment options, including on-premises and cloud-based solutions, but receives mixed customer service reviews due to occasional unresponsiveness and delays. GitHub Advanced Security integrates well within hybrid and cloud environments through the GitHub ecosystem, with generally positive support ratings but noted areas for improving response time.

Pricing and ROI: Both products are considered expensive, although OpenText Core Application Security offers flexible licensing options like pay-per-scan and subscriptions, advantageous for various use cases. GitHub Advanced Security, often perceived as costly for large teams, applies a subscription model based on developer headcount. Despite high costs, both are seen as providing solid ROI through improved security and reduced vulnerability risks.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Advanced Security
Ranking in Application Security Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Core Application S...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
64
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 3.9%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.2%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitHub Advanced Security3.9%
OpenText Core Application Security3.2%
Other92.9%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Devendiran Kandan - PeerSpot reviewer
Devendiran Kandan
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls
We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.
Read full review
Himanshu_Tyagi - PeerSpot reviewer
Himanshu_Tyagi
Lead Cybersecurity at TBO
Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration
If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."
"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."
"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."
"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."
"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."
"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."
"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."
More GitHub Advanced Security pros
"The best features with Fortify on Demand include having analysis for any product based on analysis points."
"The source code analyzer is the most effective for identifying security vulnerabilities."
"The solution scans our code and provides us with a dashboard of all the vulnerabilities and the criticality of the vulnerabilities. It is very useful that they provide right then and there all the information about the vulnerability, including possible fixes, as well as some additional documentation and links to the authoritative sources of why this is an issue and what's the correct way to deal with it."
"This product is top-notch solution and the technology is the best on the market."
"The most important feature of the product is to follow today's technology fast, updated rules and algorithms (of the product)."
"It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades."
"Fortify on Demand is a very good service which can be used by any organization when they are building a team because it identifies security vulnerabilities early in the software development life cycle and provides good visibility into issues in cloud-hosted applications."
"The most valuable features are the server, scanning, and it has helped identify issues with the security analysis."
More OpenText Core Application Security pros
 

Cons

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."
"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."
"The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities."
"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."
"The report limitations are the main issue."
"Open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."
"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."
"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."
More GitHub Advanced Security cons
"There were some regulated compliances, which were not there."
"They could provide features for artificial intelligence similar to other vendors."
"It would be highly beneficial if Fortify on Demand incorporated runtime analysis, similar to how Contrast Security utilizes agents for proactive application security."
"I would rate the support for OpenText at no more than three out of ten; it is really bad, and we encounter a lot of problems when getting support."
"An improvement would be the ability to get vulnerabilities flowing automatically into another system."
"I would like the solution to add AI support."
"Fortify on Demand needs to improve its pricing."
"If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much."
More OpenText Core Application Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."
"The solution is expensive."
"It is cost-effective."
"I believe the rental license is not too expensive, but it provides a lot of information about the vulnerabilities."
"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."
"There are different costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand depending on the assessments you want to use. There is only a standard license needed to use the solution."
"Buying a license would be feasible for regular use. For intermittent use, the cloud-based option can be used (Fortify on Demand)."
"Their subscriptions could use a little bit of a reworking, but I am very happy with what they're able to provide."
"If I exceed one million lines of code, there might be an extra cost or a change in the pricing bracket."
"The pricing model it's based on how many applications you wish to scan."
More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise45
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?
We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inli...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?
I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?
Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?
It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?
In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?
If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. T...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 33% of the time
Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 13% of the time
Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 11% of the time
Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 7% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 4% of the time
More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors
SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 20% of the time
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 10% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 5% of the time
Coverity Static vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
Coverity Static vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 5% of the time
HCL AppScan vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
HCL AppScan vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitHub Advanced Security
March 2026
GitHub Advanced Security reportDownload GitHub Advanced Security product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Application Security
March 2026
OpenText Core Application Security reportDownload OpenText Core Application Security product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
 

Overview

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?
  • Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
  • Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
  • Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
  • Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
  • Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?
  • Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
  • Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
  • Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
  • Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
  • API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
  • Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
  • Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
  • Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.
Buyer's Guide
GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security
March 2026
Free Report: GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitHub Advanced Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.