Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

INTELLIBOT vs OpenText Operations Orchestration comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.3
INTELLIBOT offers significant cost savings and immediate financial benefits with competitive pricing and reduced personnel expenses, ensuring higher returns.
Sentiment score
8.6
OpenText Operations Orchestration saves costs and time, reducing workloads and increasing productivity with a 40% efficiency improvement.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
INTELLIBOT's India service is efficient, but some users face delays and require follow-ups for resolution.
Sentiment score
6.1
OpenText Operations Orchestration's customer and technical support can be inconsistent, with users experiencing varying levels of service quality.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
INTELLIBOT is scalable, adapting to larger teams, though some users rate its scalability lower than market alternatives.
Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText Operations Orchestration is praised for scalability, handling large architectures seamlessly, and supporting diverse, extensive server networks without downtime.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
INTELLIBOT is stable and reliable with occasional glitches resolved through frequent updates, receiving a robust 7-8 rating.
Sentiment score
7.0
OpenText Operations Orchestration's stability has improved, achieving over 90% success despite minor customization and event remediation challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

INTELLIBOT users recommend less reliance on scripts, improved documentation, and enhancements in Java interaction, OCR, and customer support.
OpenText Operations Orchestration needs better integration, scalability, a modern interface, cloud options, open-source support, and pre-built workflows.
Customer support could also be improved, as they are slow to respond and appear to have policies that do not provide sufficient support for partners.
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find INTELLIBOT's pricing mixed, with costs ranging from $1,000 to $5,000, but value remains substantial.
OpenText Operations Orchestration is seen as costly but offers significant value through cost and time-saving automation capabilities.
 

Valuable Features

INTELLIBOT provides intuitive automation features, including coding-free AI tasks, document classification, role management, and Citrix integration for efficiency.
OpenText Operations Orchestration streamlines automation with easy integration, centralized management, and flexible features, reducing deployment time significantly.
INTELLIBOT provides immediate cost savings on the headcount perspective, as a lot of operational tasks can be automated.
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
 

Categories and Ranking

INTELLIBOT
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
29th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Operations Orchest...
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of INTELLIBOT is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Operations Orchestration is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Operations Orchestration0.5%
INTELLIBOT0.7%
Other98.8%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Delivery Head at Emergys Mexico
Implementation successfully automates operations but support response requires improvement
There are other INTELLIBOT products available in the market that are superior and have been around for a long time. ServiceNow's product could improve by increasing its promotion. Customer support could also be improved, as they are slow to respond and appear to have policies that do not provide sufficient support for partners. They expect partners to be self-sufficient, which seems unusual for a product company.
Ahmed Salman - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company
Increases productivity with automation and robust orchestration capabilities
The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available. There are ready-made workflows, integration with other products, a nice user interface, and reporting. The tool is flexible, agent-based or agentless. It allows significant automation and has robust orchestration and reporting capabilities. It is easy to configure and use, leading to increased efficiency across our IT processes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Educational Organization
12%
Government
10%
Performing Arts
8%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

Which lesser known RPA vendor has the best chance at unseating today's market leaders?
Intellibot.io would be my suggestion. From DPA to RPA to cognitive model long to Chatbots to IOT they have come a long way since inception. Within the short time they have rose to the top contende...
What needs improvement with INTELLIBOT?
There are other INTELLIBOT products available in the market that are superior and have been around for a long time. ServiceNow ( /products/servicenow-reviews )'s product could improve by increasing...
What is your primary use case for INTELLIBOT?
I work as an implementation partner for ServiceNow ( /products/servicenow-reviews ), using INTELLIBOT ( /products/intellibot-reviews ) primarily for process automation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Operations Orchestration?
The pricing is medium, and the automation helps in cost and time savings, resulting in substantial value for money.
What needs improvement with Operations Orchestration?
I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios. This would save time by not starting from scratch each time.
What advice do you have for others considering Operations Orchestration?
This tool serves as a central management hub, allowing seamless control of various IT processes via one console. I rate this solution eight out of ten.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Operations Orchestration, Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.
Find out what your peers are saying about INTELLIBOT vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.