Infraon IMS vs Sumo Logic Observability comparison

EverestIMS and Sumo Logic are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. EverestIMS is ranked #48, while Sumo Logic is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. EverestIMS holds a 0.4% mindshare in CMS, compared to Sumo Logic’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sumo Logic users who would recommend it.

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

654 Views
353 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sumo Logic Observability

Read 6 Sumo Logic Observability reviews

765 Views
230 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Sumo Logic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Infraon IMS and Sumo Logic Observability compete in IT management and monitoring. Sumo Logic Observability appears to have an edge with its advanced features, albeit at a higher cost, while Infraon IMS is preferred for pricing and customer support.

Features:Infraon IMS provides robust network management, automation capabilities, and powerful analytics. Sumo Logic Observability offers real-time monitoring, extensive third-party integrations, and advanced data analytics, enhancing data visibility and insights.

Room for Improvement:Infraon IMS could enhance its initial learning curve, expand integration options, and improve dashboard customization. Sumo Logic Observability may refine its ease of use, provide more straightforward query instructions, and broaden its deployment support to streamline adaptation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Infraon IMS is straightforward to install with responsive customer service that promotes quicker adoption. Sumo Logic Observability, though complex due to its advanced feature set, provides thorough documentation for guidance, requiring more technical depth for deployment.

Pricing and ROI:Infraon IMS offers competitive setup costs, facilitating a faster return on investment with its cost-effective pricing. Sumo Logic Observability, despite a potential higher initial expense, yields solid ROI via enhanced data insights and long-term benefits for organizations seeking advanced functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. Sumo Logic Observability Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. Sumo Logic Observability

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

48th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (87th), Server Monitoring (34th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (57th)

Sumo Logic Observability

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (24th), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sumo Logic Observability is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sumo Logic Observability	0.3%
Infraon IMS	0.4%
Other	99.3%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Maharajan S

VSO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization

The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.

Read full review

Shamshir Nangla

Site Reliability Engineer at LHV Bank

Getting up and running is easy, even for a newbie but management of searches definitely needs improvement

Operational effectiveness with regards to when there's an issue, when there's a reactive issue, people are able to, or as well as proactively, actually, because we use their PagerDuty integrations. We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening. With those same alerts, obviously, with that platform, you can use it to reactively start looking at troubleshooting issues as they're happening right then and there or incidents. So it's been very, very good for alerting and for troubleshooting issues. For predicting issues before they happen, it is not very good. They have a feature called anomaly detection, but I think it's quite premature compared to other stuff out there. So it's good for alerts and for troubleshooting operational effectiveness. When your operations are down or segregated, it's perfect because it will help you diagnose the issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"Alerting and consistency are key. We have different tiers with log collectors, and continuous querying provides near-real-time updates. It's almost like instantly when something happens, like pending transactions or error fees. This helps reduce incident resolution time compared to waiting for thresholds on other platforms. We can continue logging in with them seamlessly and quickly get into action."

"The solution allows multiple groups to converge on a unified platform, allowing for different utilization by various teams."

"I have not seen any stability issues in the product."

"The product is easy to learn."

"We use queries in Sumo Logic to trigger alerts based on logging. That allows us to proactively identify issues as they're happening."

"Sumo Logic Observability presents a range of valuable features, including well-crafted dashboards and a diverse selection of helpful apps. However, personally, I don't hold a favorable opinion of the solution. While I don't struggle with writing queries, my main difficulty lies in recruiting competent individuals and ensuring their proficiency in utilizing the solution. This often leads to additional challenges and complexities. From my perspective, when compared to Microsoft Sentinel or even Splunk, Sumo Logic Observability has a steeper learning curve. One contributing factor to this disparity is the solution's long existence in the market compared to Synlogic. Nevertheless, I acknowledge that there are capable and knowledgeable professionals employed at Sumo Logic Observability. The effectiveness of the solution largely depends on how it is integrated into your internal operations and environment. Its utility and benefits can vary significantly. It is worth noting that organizations like the NSA and, I believe, the CIA used it in the past, primarily for rapidly searching and analyzing large volumes of data. To leverage its capabilities effectively, you must determine how to tailor it to your specific needs."

Cons

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five minutes."

"Documentation could be better. While it's generally good, sometimes finding what you need requires extensive searching. It's not always clear where to look for specific things."

"Fine-grained data can be quite frustrating to work with and should be made easier."

"Implementing a more streamlined enrichment process, and conceptualizing the observability data collection as an ETL pipeline would be helpful."

"SearchUI.exe is a bit clunky in the product, making it an area where the product needs improvements."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"I started on the free tier to try it out, but because of our usage, we're now paying for it."

"Now, they’re not charging by ingests anymore. You should expect the price to be a bit of an unknown and to basically increase as the business increases."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sumo Logic Observability?

The product is easy to learn.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sumo Logic Observability?

The speed of queries could be improved. When using more advanced functions, especially with large datasets like the 90-day log retention we had, queries could be slow, sometimes taking up to five m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sumo Logic Observability?

We used it for log observability – log aggregation specifically.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 33% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 31% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS

Compared 19% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 17% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Dynatrace vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 31% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 28% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

New Relic vs Sumo Logic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

More Sumo Logic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

September 2025

Download Infraon IMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Sumo Logic Observability

September 2025

Download Sumo Logic Observability product report

Also Known As

Everest IMS

No data available

Overview

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sumo Logic Observability offers advanced monitoring solutions with features like integrated dashboards and querying capabilities, though presents a learning curve compared to alternatives. Designed for efficient log aggregation and analysis, it provides near-real-time updates facilitating improved incident resolution.

Sumo Logic Observability stands out with its ability to unify teams through a single platform, offering features that include customizable dashboards and valuable apps. It provides powerful log tracing and centralized management, designed for organizations focused on log aggregation, analysis, and expanding SIEM capabilities. While it has a steeper learning curve compared to some competitors, it excels in tailored integrations that enhance log searches. Users find themselves able to monitor, automate, and centralize log repositories for effective debugging. Despite its strengths, improvements in data enrichment and documentation organization are needed as current query functions can be slow, impacting efficiency. Users have also mentioned needing pre-built dashboards and better tab management for enhanced functionality. Cost management remains a notable consideration for users evaluating Sumo Logic Observability.

What features make Sumo Logic Observability effective?

Well-Crafted Dashboards: Customizable options for monitoring.
Flexible Query Language: Allows detailed log searches.
Centralized Management: Enables teams to work on one platform.
Near-Real-Time Updates: Enhances timely incident resolution.
Custom Field Creation: Facilitates user-specific data requirements.

How does Sumo Logic Observability benefit organizations?

Unified Platform: Brings teams together for streamlined operations.
Enhanced Integrations: Improves log search accuracy.
Tailored for SIEM: Supports security needs with efficient log management.
Efficient Data Monitoring: Automates processes for ease of management.
Scalability: Handles large data volumes efficiently.

Sumo Logic Observability is implemented across industries predominantly for managing and analyzing extensive data sets, offering capabilities critical for SIEM activities and security examinations. By facilitating quick data visualization and transaction tracking, organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology benefit from its robust framework to support infrastructure logging and large-scale data management, contributing to effective monitoring and system operations.

Sumo Logic

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. Sumo Logic Observability

September 2025

Free Report: Infraon IMS vs. Sumo Logic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon IMS vs. Sumo Logic Observability and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon IMS vs. Sumo Logic Observability report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.