Icinga vs Statseeker comparison

Icinga and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Icinga holds a 3.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

3,895 Views
3,428 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

538 Views
479 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Icinga

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Icinga and Statseeker compete in the network monitoring domain. Statseeker appears to lead due to its extensive feature set and ease of deployment.

Features: Icinga emphasizes customization and flexibility for tailored monitoring solutions and supports various protocols and advanced data processing, making it suitable for environments needing adaptability. Statseeker offers rapid detection, dashboard visualization, and a focus on large-scale network hardware monitoring, positioning it as a strong option for vast network infrastructure needs.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could improve its steep learning curve and ease of integration for beginners. More extensive documentation and support resources would benefit users seeking immediate usability. Statseeker might enhance its customizability options to cater to niche industry needs, integrate more third-party tools, and offer more competitive pricing options for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga's modular architecture offers options for on-premises or cloud integration but involves a complex configuration process. Community support is robust, aiding in troubleshooting. Statseeker provides straightforward deployment with efficient customer service, allowing quick integration with minimal technical knowledge, making it more user-friendly in terms of setup and support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga's open-source nature presents a lower initial setup cost, but effective use requires resources for custom development and maintenance, potentially affecting ROI. Statseeker's pricing is higher, reflecting comprehensive features and support with prospects of faster ROI through immediate benefits in managing large networks. While Icinga offers cost-effective customization, Statseeker's investment is justified by its performance in network monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (13th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (28th), Cloud Monitoring Software (22nd)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Harrison Bulley

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Net Consulting

A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification

I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

More Icinga pros

"The solution reduces the complexity of our network monitoring because it can make my engineers do their jobs faster. The solution also reduces troubleshooting time for network administrators to pinpoint issues quicker."

"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

More Icinga cons

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The solution is cheap."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The solution is free to use."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"It's an open-source solution."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Icinga?

The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?

It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Icinga?

There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 41% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 20% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 10% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 28% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

August 2025

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

July 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Free Report: Icinga vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.