No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apache Web Server vs IIS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IIS
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Application Server (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 8.0%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IIS is 7.1%, down from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IIS7.1%
Apache Web Server8.0%
Other84.9%
Application Infrastructure
 

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw
Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications
I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.
Krishnakumar Natarajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer at Atos
Designs and manages multiple websites while ensuring data backup and disaster recovery
I have experience with AWS, and I am most familiar with the server environment, as we just use the server environment and then use Microsoft products on an AWS environment. I have experience with Windows Server IIS, which I ran on my own on-premise data center. The website was developed and then hosted, and through IIS, we managed the servers. The manageability within the IIS environment is not very difficult. For server management, you need to ensure data backup, data restore, and you have a DR configured to keep the database intact. It was done on-premises, so I had no problem doing that. If you have to go to the cloud, then you should have the storage connected to the IIS server and also have a DR set up for that. I didn't use Microsoft Azure tools, but since it is a Microsoft product, Azure has all the portability, so you don't have to worry about compatibility on the cloud. On a scale of 1-10, I would rate this solution a 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apache is a powerful tool with which you can make it do just about anything you need."
"Apache Web Server is free of cost."
"Apache has proven to be incredibly reliable, and everything has operated smoothly without encountering any issues."
"It is scalable."
"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."
"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages."
"Apache Web Server effectively runs any web application, including Java-based applications, and includes Apache Tomcat server, which is crucial."
"The Apache Web Server is our software of choice for running our web servers for the past seven (7) years."
"IIS's most valuable feature is user-friendliness."
"IIS is a reliable and secure product, works very well along side other components such as SQL and dotnet."
"It's good and offers good usability."
"The initial setup of this solution is very easy."
"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."
"It was crucial and it definitely paid off."
"What I like most about this program is the fact that it's built into Windows, and then I also like the interface and the support."
"This is definitely a stable solution."
 

Cons

"With Apache, you can't update the system. There is a big gap between models. I don't like this."
"You know what? I found negligible difference between Apache and Nginx."
"I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and fast enough in edge cases without crashing under too much traffic during spikes."
"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"
"The major issue occurs with ports. So, I would like to see easier port management."
"The only thing that gives me a frown about the Apache Web Server is the command-line configuration."
"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."
"So far, for us, everything is okay."
"The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."
"The only issue I've encountered is with certificates not working fine sometimes. It's influenced by the server's service performance."
"The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."
"IIS could improve the error logging. There are times we are not able to see the errors."
"The solution must improve the integration between its databases."
"The security must be improved."
"The solution's stability needs improvement."
"The user interface could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source solution."
"The apache software is free, open-source."
"It is a free-of-cost solution."
"There is no licensing cost for the product."
"It is licensed with your Windows installation which makes it relatively cheap if you already have a Windows Server sitting around."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."
"There is an annual license to use this solution and the price could be better."
"The cost for IIS is already included in Windows services. We don't have to pay anything extra."
"IIS's pricing is reasonable."
"They offer a one-time payment model for the product license, and we pay annually for support."
"Users can get a subscription-based license or a perpetual license for IIS."
"The product's price is not high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?
There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...
What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?
I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...
What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?
I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...
Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?
IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IIS?
For the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IIS, as a Microsoft product, I didn't think much about separately purchasing an IIS product as it is part of Microsoft Windows. We bought a developmen...
What needs improvement with IIS?
I see that IIS has maintained the same interface for a long time, so they could potentially use more automation or integrate Copilot into it to make it easier to use. I have not accessed or checked...
 

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server
Windows Server IIS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx
Erste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. IIS and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.