IIS and NGINX Plus are prominent products competing in the web server software category. NGINX Plus appears to have the upper hand in terms of performance and versatility, whereas IIS could be more advantageous for users already within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Features: IIS is known for its ease of use and seamless integration with Microsoft products, making it ideal for less experienced users. It has strong reliability with features such as bandwidth limiting and automatic application restarts after crashes. NGINX Plus is recognized for high performance, offering robust load balancing and reverse proxy capabilities, making it adept at handling demanding web traffic and complex network integrations.
Room for Improvement: IIS could improve its compatibility with non-Windows platforms and enhance its integration and monitoring capabilities. Users of NGINX Plus seek a more intuitive GUI and simpler configuration processes, along with better performance optimization in aspects like memory usage and load balancing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both IIS and NGINX Plus are mainly deployed on-premises. NGINX Plus, however, showcases more adaptability in hybrid and public cloud environments. Community support and documentation serve both products well, but formal technical support has received mixed reviews. IIS users find variability in Microsoft's support, while NGINX users benefit from comprehensive open-source community resources.
Pricing and ROI: IIS is often economical due to its bundling with Windows Server licenses, though recurring high Windows costs may offset savings. Its integration with Microsoft ecosystems typically yields positive ROI. NGINX Plus provides a free version and competitive paid options, appealing to budget-conscious consumers, and offers good value despite potentially high costs for enterprise-grade features.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
There are typically no significant issues.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
While some people use NGINX for web servers, my current use case focuses on networking and tunneling, which does not necessitate much scaling.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
I would rate IIS's stability as an eight out of ten.
I require ninety-nine point nine percent uptime, and NGINX has been pivotal in helping me achieve this along with our other DNS services.
It's influenced by the server's service performance.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
As with any application, there were initial issues, however, after receiving support, everything was rectified.
NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.
The solution offers a cost advantage.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
The configurations are simple, making it very easy to use and to set up everything.
For API management, the WebSocket, and the WebServer, NGINX provides a cost advantage, value addition, and effective support.
NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.
NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
