

IIS and NGINX Plus compete in the web server market. Based on features, deployment flexibility, and performance, NGINX Plus seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced capabilities and efficient performance.
Features: IIS is well-integrated with Microsoft products and offers features like bandwidth control and application isolation, making it favorable for users within the Windows ecosystem. NGINX Plus provides robust features such as reverse proxying, load balancing, and an advanced authentication system, making it ideal for complex deployments and high-performance requirements.
Room for Improvement: IIS struggles with compatibility and flexibility, especially in non-Windows environments, and needs enhancements in monitoring and debugging. NGINX Plus could improve configuration simplicity and user interfaces and enhance health check features in its open-source version.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IIS is predominantly used in on-premises settings, while NGINX Plus offers deployment versatility across cloud environments. Users of NGINX Plus tend to rely on community support due to less direct interaction with official support, while IIS users report varying experiences with Microsoft’s technical support.
Pricing and ROI: IIS offers competitive pricing, especially when bundled with Windows Server licenses, providing good ROI for businesses integrated with Microsoft. NGINX Plus offers a free open-source version, but premium features can be costly, with its ROI depending heavily on usage scale and deployment needs.
It should be more user-friendly overall, because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
There are typically no significant issues.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
I would rate the support from Microsoft very high because I definitely got all the help during the testing time of the development kit while we were configuring features on our on-premises server.
Response time is good because they have assigned and dedicated support engineers to us, and we have weekly cadence calls.
Cloud solutions may have better scalability options compared to IIS.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
While some people use NGINX for web servers, my current use case focuses on networking and tunneling, which does not necessitate much scaling.
It was secured for us, as we launched the product, and people were accessing it from India and Virginia, and we had no problem.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
You can check the memory consumption and the number of crashes.
I require ninety-nine point nine percent uptime, and NGINX has been pivotal in helping me achieve this along with our other DNS services.
It should be more user-friendly because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
Integrating Copilot could help automate processes or assist in identifying where to make actions or take actions on the server.
NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates.
As with any application, there were initial issues, however, after receiving support, everything was rectified.
There were some vulnerabilities in F5.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
We never had any pricing issue, but I don't know if it is competitive or not.
My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.
The solution offers a cost advantage.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
IIS is free.
Entra ID functions as the security front-end for all user management and identity management with Azure.
For API management, the WebSocket, and the WebServer, NGINX provides a cost advantage, value addition, and effective support.
The web application firewall feature has helped enhance security for our applications because most of the attacks which are performed on our website are being blocked by it.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IIS | 10.1% |
| NGINX Plus | 9.3% |
| Other | 80.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.
NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.