Microsoft IIS and Red Hat JBoss EAP compete in the web server and application server markets. JBoss tends to have the upper hand with enhanced scalability and Java support, making it suitable for complex, enterprise-level applications.
Features: IIS is valued for its seamless integration with Microsoft products, ease of use for Windows environments, and lack of extra licensing costs. It also provides efficient management capabilities. JBoss EAP is known for its scalability, support for Java applications, and robust J2EE features, which make it flexible and suitable for enterprise-level solutions. Its ability to integrate with broader enterprise solutions enhances its versatility.
Room for Improvement: IIS struggles with compatibility outside the Microsoft ecosystem and could improve on security and scalability aspects. JBoss, while robust, could enhance documentation and automation to cater to beginners better. Users seek improved integration with emerging technologies and better logging and stability enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IIS is praised for easy deployment in Windows environments and benefits from a strong community, although its official support may be slow. JBoss offers various deployment options and is valued for its modularity, though customer support could better address complex issues. Both solutions have strong community support.
Pricing and ROI: IIS benefits from its inclusion in Windows Server, reducing direct costs yet could be expensive for some users. Its ROI is bolstered by integration simplicity. JBoss is cost-effective, especially for those seeking open-source options. While initial expenses can be high, IBM's acquisition offers solid support and significant ROI, particularly in Java-based environments.
This flexibility translates to a lower total cost of ownership.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
There are typically no significant issues.
We receive support from RDS and Red Hat, and the response time and quality meet our expectations.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
I would rate IIS's stability as an eight out of ten.
It is quite stable for our needs.
It's influenced by the server's service performance.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
Making it lighter and more modular would probably be beneficial.
I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
JBoss is the cheaper option out of the three when compared to WebSphere and WebLogic.
The price is somewhat high for an enterprise, however, it depends on organizational negotiations.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
The configurations are simple, making it very easy to use and to set up everything.
Built-in metrics and subsystem isolation, where every subsystem logging, messaging, or web services can be tuned independently, provide fine-grained control over performance and behavior.
It allows for simple modification of applications and provides better clustering capabilities.
JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) provides scalable, secure, and reliable infrastructure for Java applications, offering high availability, modular architecture, and smooth integration with new technologies.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is tailored for deploying and managing web and application servers, with a strong focus on Java applications, APIs, and core business systems. It ensures easy setup and cost-effectiveness, accommodating high availability and clustering enhancements like session replication via Infinispan. While managing configurations and deployments effectively, EAP facilitates flexible deployment modes and enhanced security using OpenID Connect. However, areas needing improvement include customization options, runtime diagnostics, integration capabilities, documentation, and technical support. Automation needs expansion, pricing options could be more competitive, and better alignment with Jakarta EE is suggested for modernization.
What are the standout features of Red Hat JBoss EAP?Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) finds application across industries such as finance, web development, and enterprise middleware services. Its capabilities are demonstrated in managing banking transactions, supporting legacy systems, integrating with external APIs, and fulfilling enterprise needs in installation, configuration, automation, and security tasks.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
