Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IIS vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
IIS offers positive ROI with authentication benefits, affordability, and security, though user-friendly improvements are suggested for accessibility.
Sentiment score
5.7
Red Hat JBoss offers cost-effective, scalable solutions with rapid ROI and automation, outpacing Oracle WebLogic in financial benefits.
It should be more user-friendly overall, because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
This flexibility translates to a lower total cost of ownership.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft support gets mixed reviews; praised for efficiency and resources, but criticized for slow response and entry-level understanding.
Sentiment score
6.2
Red Hat JBoss EAP support is knowledgeable and reliable, but response time varies; strong community aids troubleshooting.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
There are typically no significant issues.
I would rate the support from Microsoft very high because I definitely got all the help during the testing time of the development kit while we were configuring features on our on-premises server.
Users can find discussions about common problems, solutions, and documentation within the community.
We receive support from RDS and Red Hat, and the response time and quality meet our expectations.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
IIS is scalable for varied applications, though dependent on hardware, with improvements in clustering and flexible service management.
Sentiment score
6.7
Red Hat JBoss EAP is scalable and efficient, supporting various organizational sizes, though some seek better load balancing documentation.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
IIS is stable, reliable, and highly rated by users, with occasional compatibility issues with non-Microsoft technologies.
Sentiment score
7.2
Red Hat JBoss EAP is stable, reliable under heavy loads, and performs well in diverse environments like AWS and Google Cloud.
It was secured for us, as we launched the product, and people were accessing it from India and Virginia, and we had no problem.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
I would rate IIS's stability as an eight out of ten.
It is quite stable for our needs.
 

Room For Improvement

IIS struggles with compatibility, user-friendliness, integration, performance, security, and documentation challenges, posing significant user and scalability issues.
Red Hat JBoss EAP needs enhanced customization, better deployment, improved integration, cloud readiness, and expanded microservices and MLOps features.
It's influenced by the server's service performance.
It should be more user-friendly because unless you know how IIS works as a Microsoft product, a system admin cannot just manage it.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
Making it lighter and more modular would probably be beneficial.
I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console.
 

Setup Cost

IIS licensing is bundled with Windows Server, offering flexible options but may incur extra costs for services and fees.
Red Hat JBoss EAP provides flexible, cost-effective subscriptions with competitive pricing, appealing to enterprises for support and additional features.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
We never had any pricing issue, but I don't know if it is competitive or not.
JBoss is the cheaper option out of the three when compared to WebSphere and WebLogic.
The price is somewhat high for an enterprise, however, it depends on organizational negotiations.
 

Valuable Features

IIS is user-friendly, efficient, secure, and integrates well with Microsoft, offering scalability and control for IT administrators.
Red Hat JBoss EAP provides scalable, flexible enterprise solutions with seamless Java integration, robust security, and cross-platform support.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
The configurations are simple, making it very easy to use and to set up everything.
The best features of IIS are that you can design your own website and manage it yourself, creating as many websites as you want.
Built-in metrics and subsystem isolation, where every subsystem logging, messaging, or web services can be tuned independently, provide fine-grained control over performance and behavior.
It allows for simple modification of applications and provides better clustering capabilities.
JBoss is more flexible and keeps up with modern technologies, supporting newer versions of different libraries.
 

Categories and Ranking

IIS
Ranking in Application Server
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (1st)
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Ap...
Ranking in Application Server
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of IIS is 5.9%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is 16.6%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)16.6%
IIS5.9%
Other77.5%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Natarajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Designs and manages multiple websites while ensuring data backup and disaster recovery
I have experience with AWS, and I am most familiar with the server environment, as we just use the server environment and then use Microsoft products on an AWS environment. I have experience with Windows Server IIS, which I ran on my own on-premise data center. The website was developed and then hosted, and through IIS, we managed the servers. The manageability within the IIS environment is not very difficult. For server management, you need to ensure data backup, data restore, and you have a DR configured to keep the database intact. It was done on-premises, so I had no problem doing that. If you have to go to the cloud, then you should have the storage connected to the IIS server and also have a DR set up for that. I didn't use Microsoft Azure tools, but since it is a Microsoft product, Azure has all the portability, so you don't have to worry about compatibility on the cloud. On a scale of 1-10, I would rate this solution a 10.
Srinadh  Puli - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation aids installation while management consolidation needs improvement
We are currently using Ansible for Jira installations and all the management tasks. We perform some tasks manually, however, Ansible helps in automating some of these processes I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere. It allows for simple modification of…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?
IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IIS?
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS. However, you may need to pay for SSL publishing at times.
What do you like most about JBoss?
The product's initial setup phase is easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss?
My advice is to carefully review the licensing options before setting up JBoss. While using the free version WildFly, most companies go for the paid Red Hat JBoss version, which comes with extra fe...
What needs improvement with JBoss?
JBoss can be improved significantly, especially regarding deployment overlays that need updates to apply quick fixes or environment-specific changes without redirecting the archive. Enhancements in...
 

Also Known As

Windows Server IIS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Erste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute
Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE
Find out what your peers are saying about IIS vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.