IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Identity Governance comparison

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Identity Governance

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (16th), Access Management (13th)

Oracle Identity Governance

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (6th), Mobile Identity (1st), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Identity Governance is 2.7%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Identity Governance	2.7%
IBM Security Verify Access	1.4%
Other	95.9%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Ziad Khawam

Company Manager at cloudbreak

Identity workflows have delivered strong governance but remain complex to install and customize

I would describe the installation of Oracle Identity Governance on-premises as quite complex. Very complex. To install the product, it took us maybe three or four days to get it up and running just to go through the installation procedures. I repeated the same exercise in 2017 because I also migrated from 11c to 12c. That was the migration in 2017 that I managed. The migration took a long time. It took two to three years to be able to literally migrate all the code that I had. So it was quite complex. To summarize it quickly, I would describe the product as complete, very powerful, and very capable. However, it is extremely complex because Oracle relies on their own framework to customize and develop and fine-tune the functionalities. It is not Java, it is not some public framework. It is Java-based more or less, but it has their own Oracle framework for development and that makes the product quite complex to harness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"It can do a lot of different functions, and different types of teams can use this product for a variety of use cases, such as RSA, OTP, and single sign-on functionalities."

"IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

"Good features are the RBAC and UI customization."

"What I like most about Oracle Identity Governance is that it is a very flexible tool, as it allows you to do any customization on Java since it is built on Java and you can write any customization code using Java, and I also like that Oracle Identity Governance is pretty much stable, so in my company, where there are a lot of users, my company prefers this solution."

"Automated Provisioning to applications has removed the effort required to manually create accounts in applications, which increases our productivity."

"I can say that RBAC, or role-based access control is the most reliable feature."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks."

"Oracle Identity Management enables organizations to manage the entire life cycle of user identities across all resources in the organization while automating user provisioning and deprovisioning."

"Identity Manager solves a very real problem that they have which is to control all identities they have in their system as well as access to those identities."

"It has improved the way my organization functions through customer implemented OIM and OIA."

More Oracle Identity Governance pros

Cons

"For small or medium-sized businesses they cannot afford this solution."

"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

"The solution should be easy to implement with components combined in one file and built-in features to integrate target applications without having to install additional connectors."

"Oracle Identity Governance can capture a lot of loads, it's stable. However, we once had a problem two years ago, but it is now resolved. There are some issues still present, but they're operational. They don't impact the customers. There are some improvements that can be done."

"There were issues when we deployed it, though Oracle helped us resolve them."

"An area for improvement in Oracle Identity Governance is that it isn't refreshed or updated as much. The only area that changed on it in the last five years was the GUI. The solution still has the same installation, troubleshooting, and configuration. Oracle Identity Governance is still very complicated when compared to other solutions. It seems that Oracle doesn't focus too much on Oracle Identity Governance in terms of making some improvements to it."

"Automation of validation exercises performed by humans over Recon Exceptions generated as a result of an access synchronization event over a user's need for access or not."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult compared to other tools."

"Everybody's been moving onto the cloud, and it's not a cloud-based solution."

"I have yet to see its full functionality exercised in my organization."

More Oracle Identity Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"The licensing cost for Oracle Identity Governance is very high, so I'd rate it two out of five."

"The price is based on the number of users per year."

"I can't say much about the pricing for Oracle Identity Governance because it's different from one geography to another. In India, the license price costs less than in other geographies."

"The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive."

"The licensing is expensive."

"Oracle Identity Governance is an expensive solution."

"Price-wise, the tool is a little bit costly."

"The price of the implementation of Oracle Identity Governance is more of a concern than the cost of the solution. The effort that you have to do to put the solution in place is higher than the license cost."

More Oracle Identity Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?

We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automatio...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Governance?

Whether Oracle Identity Governance is affordable or slightly expensive depends on the category. For a small-scale company or organization, I don't think it will be useful, but for a large-scale ent...

What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?

What is your primary use case for Oracle Identity Governance?

I am currently working on Oracle Identity Governance and Oracle Access Manager (OAM), as I am specialized in the IAM sphere and working on these two particular products from Oracle. I have implemen...

Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 6% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 7% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 6% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Identity Governance Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Security Verify Access

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Oracle Identity Governance

Download Oracle Identity Governance product report

Also Known As

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite

Overview

IBM Security Verify Access offers adaptable access management with multi-factor authentication, seamless protocol integration, and strong user management, suitable for cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Security Verify Access provides multi-factor authentication, seamless integration with protocols like SAML and OAuth, and features including password vaults and single sign-on. Its adaptable nature allows for deployment both in cloud and on-premises settings. Users appreciate its quick setup, reliable authorization, and efficient user management, especially when integrated with Active Directory. The intuitive interface enhances security with mobile features like QR code enrollment, making it suitable for diverse environments. However, cloud deployment could be simpler, and the interface could use enhancements for better ease. Onboarding applications and support availability need improvements, and configuration for OIDC and OAuth should mature. More comprehensive documentation and simplified installation are also needed, along with automation to reduce resource consumption.

What are the key features of IBM Security Verify Access?

Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust multi-layered security.
Integration with Protocols: Works with SAML and OAuth for seamless connectivity.
Password Vaults: Secure storage for user credentials.
Single Sign-On: Streamlines access across platforms.
Active Directory Integration: Ensures efficient user management.
Mobile Features: Includes QR code enrollment for enhanced security.

What benefits or ROI can users expect to find in the reviews?

Rapid Setup: Quick deployment in cloud and on-premises environments.
Reliable Authorization: Trustworthy access control and management.
Security Enhancements: Through multi-factor authentication and mobile features.
Streamlined Processes: Simplified access management with single sign-on.

IBM Security Verify Access is widely used in the banking and educational sectors for access management, supporting activities like single sign-on and control across different user groups. Many in these industries utilize it for customer authentication and integrate it with mobile systems to enhance security. Its adaptability allows it to serve complex needs, particularly useful in environments such as universities and financial institutions.

IBM

Oracle Identity Governance offers centralized identity management with features like lifecycle management and integration with other Oracle offerings. It ensures secure governance and efficient user access, catering to large organizations.

Oracle Identity Governance is known for its comprehensive lifecycle management, centralizing identity activities. It automates provisioning, de-provisioning, and self-service password reset, which enhances compliance capabilities and security. The platform supports integration with HR and custom applications, enabling efficient user access management. Although challenged by complexity and infrastructure requirements, which create a steep learning curve, it provides scalable solutions crucial for telecom, finance, and healthcare sectors. Users note its outdated interface and difficulty in setup. Cost remains a consideration accompanied by limited automation support.

What are the key features of Oracle Identity Governance?

Lifecycle Management: Supports end-to-end identity processes with automation.
Centralized ID Management: Aggregates all identity activities under one framework.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures precise user access.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Oracle and other business applications.
Compliance: Aids in meeting industry certification needs.

What benefits should users look for in Oracle Identity Governance reviews?

Scalability: Essential for large-scale organizations.
Automation: Reduces manual intervention and errors.
Security: Provides robust identity governance.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes through self-service options.

In industries like telecom, finance, and healthcare, Oracle Identity Governance is deployed to streamline user onboarding, access provisioning, and role management. It enhances operational efficiency with multi-factor authentication and integration capabilities that align with large-scale user management needs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

POST Luxembourg

Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Identity Governance