IBM Resilient vs NetWitness NDR comparison

IBM and NetWitness are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.0, while NetWitness is ranked #25. IBM holds a 1.9% mindshare in SOAR, compared to NetWitness’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of NetWitness users who would recommend it.

IBM Resilient

Read 18 IBM Resilient reviews

1,290 Views
1,161 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

NetWitness NDR

Read 15 NetWitness NDR reviews

1,789 Views
179 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

IBM Resilient

NetWitness NDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

NetWitness NDR and IBM Resilient compete in the cybersecurity market. Customers favor NetWitness NDR for its support and pricing, while IBM Resilient is valued for its robust features despite higher costs.

Features: NetWitness NDR provides real-time network traffic analysis, extensive reporting capabilities, and detailed network visibility. IBM Resilient offers incident response automation, strong workflow management, and comprehensive incident response capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NetWitness NDR could enhance integration capabilities and expand third-party system compatibility. Some users suggest improving its interface flexibility and reducing configuration complexity. IBM Resilient might benefit from a more user-friendly setup process, additional customization options, and improvements in ease of integration with more external tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness NDR is known for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer support. In contrast, IBM Resilient may involve a longer setup but provides rich training resources and comprehensive documentation, helping users fully utilize its features.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness NDR is appreciated for its competitive pricing and favorable ROI through cost-effective deployment. IBM Resilient has a higher initial cost, justified by extensive capabilities in addressing complex security threats, offering substantial ROI for those needing advanced incident management features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Resilient vs. NetWitness NDR Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient vs. NetWitness NDR

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Resilient

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

16th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Incident Response (4th)

NetWitness NDR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (59th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (40th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (61st), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (19th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of IBM Resilient is 1.9%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetWitness NDR is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Usman Bhatti

Senior Officer Security Operations Center at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility

Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.

Read full review

SupravatMaji

Associate Vice President - IT Security at Inspira Enterprise

Beneficial single unified dashboard, good native application integration, and high availability

My advice to those wanting to implement RSA NetWitness Network is they have to first do a little due diligence, such as the exact requirement based on their needs. That will give them a direction for their investment because otherwise, the bill of material or bill of quantity (BOQ) may be higher side. It is important to do good due intelligence on the environment, see the exact requirement, and then go ahead with the solution. The solution is perfectly stable. I rate RSA NetWitness Network a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with IBM SIM and the ability to block users during brute force attacks are particularly effective."

"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."

"What I like most about IBM Resilient is that it has a complete stack, which means you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under the IBM Resilient umbrella. You don't need to worry much about integrations and components because you're working with tested and proven architecture."

"The solution is easy to use."

"IBM Resilient is scalable."

"The solution is reliable in our usage."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable thing about it is how easy it is to navigate the user interface."

More IBM Resilient pros

"The log correlation is good."

"The most valuable feature is the way it captures the traffic, and it contains every detail of the communication."

"The stability of the RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very good."

"NetWitness Endpoint's most valuable features are its interoperability across many different operating systems and the ease of pivoting from network to endpoint via a single console."

"It helps our security team respond more accurately when there are threats, then we get less false positives or negatives."

"Ability to isolate the machine when there are malicious files."

"It's a scalable solution. We have around five to eight customers using RSA NetWitness Endpoint, and we hope to increase the number of users."

"RSA NetWitness does market analysis in a more granular form. It gives you full visibility."

More NetWitness NDR pros

Cons

"Its price needs improvement."

"IBM Resilient could integrate better with my tools."

"The initial setup is complex."

"The implementation could be a bit simpler."

"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."

"Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations."

"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."

More IBM Resilient cons

"The solution is modular, for example you can buy the RSA ePack, which you buy as a module is not part of the conduit solution. They could include it and have it as an all-in-one solution."

"Its price could be improved. It is an expensive product. Its training is also too expensive. It would be great if they can have a better pricing scheme for the training."

"RSA NetWitness Network could improve on integration with non-native application integration."

"The contamination feature could be improved."

"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."

"This solution needs an upgrade in reporting. I have heard from RSA that they are working on this, but as of yet it is not available."

"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."

"Threat detection could be better."

More NetWitness NDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."

"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."

"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."

"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."

"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."

"The cost of the product is quite high."

"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."

More IBM Resilient pricing and cost advice

"With RSA, there is flexibility in choosing the service, products, and the range that meets your requirement, as well as they are flexible in terms of pricing."

"The price of the solution depends on the environment. If the environment is large then it will cost more. However, the larger the environment with more endpoints, you will receive an increased discount. If the environment is very small, then you might think it is expensive. It is always better to buy in bulk to receive a discount. The minimum number of assets is usually 500, with discounts on 1000 and 2000."

"The cost depends on the number of endpoints that you want to monitor, but it is not expensive."

"The pricing is not very economical. It is a quite costly product for India. One thing is that when you purchase it, you have to purchase a module separately."

"They can easily adjust if you have the requirements which are required. If you have a budget cut or a budget constraint, they can bend."

"NetWitness Endpoint is less costly than its competitors, but it offers fewer features."

"We are on a three-year contract to use RSA NetWitness Network."

"It is highly scalable. It can be bought based on your requirements."

More NetWitness NDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Resilient?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?

I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?

Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 33% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs IBM Resilient

Compared 18% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 10% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs IBM Resilient

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Resilient Competitors

Darktrace vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 13% of the time

Fidelis Elevate vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

Vectra AI vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

More NetWitness NDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient

August 2025

Download IBM Resilient product report

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR

August 2025

Download NetWitness NDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network

Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

IBM

Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.

NetWitness

Sample Customers

Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient vs. NetWitness NDR

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Resilient vs. NetWitness NDR

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. NetWitness NDR and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Resilient vs. NetWitness NDR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.