IBM OpenPages vs MetricStream vs RSA Archer comparison

Read 4 MetricStream reviews

2,470 Views
2,075 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

RSA Archer

Read 42 RSA Archer reviews

6,476 Views
5,569 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM OpenPages

RSA Archer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, Diligent and others in GRC.

To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2026).

Download the complete report

GRC

April 2026

Helped 894,998 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the GRC category, the mindshare of IBM OpenPages is 2.6%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MetricStream is 3.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 5.9%, down from 17.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
RSA Archer	5.9%
IBM OpenPages	2.6%
MetricStream	3.2%
Other	88.3%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Gabriele Meneguzzi

GRC Practice Leader at Stratos Analytics

Have improved operational control and simplified internal workflows through a clear user interface

The most useful features in IBM OpenPages are the workflow features and front-end. The workflow feature in IBM OpenPages is very flexible, easy to configure, and can help design every kind of process, while the front-end is very useful, clear, simple, and dynamic. The benefit of a centralized platform in risk management, such as IBM OpenPages, is that it allows sharing information and guarantees a central framework of risk and control. The dashboards in IBM OpenPages help with monitoring processes for different users and profiles, and we use the dashboard extensively to show the state of different processes to control them. IBM OpenPages integrates effectively with other tools and existing infrastructure for my customers as we integrate other tools, using APIs to match different information, though some other tools may better support integration. IBM offers Connect, an add-on for integration, but we do not use it, relying solely on API. The reporting tools in IBM OpenPages have very strong potential because they are linked with Cognos IBM, a business intelligence tool, allowing for very good and complex reports, though creating these reports requires skills in business intelligence to get the most out of IBM OpenPages.

Read full review

John Quant

Owner at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Centralized risk libraries have streamlined audits and now highlight clunky workflows and upgrades

MetricStream can be improved in several areas. Sometimes the overall flow of the application can seem a bit clunky, based on feedback from clients. From my understanding and what I have heard from developers within MetricStream during my deeper use of the application, the application seems to have been developed within silos, and the interaction of certain applications internally could definitely be improved in terms of the overall coding that exists between applications within the solution. The only improvement I suggest for MetricStream is to gather a collaborative think tank from several of the largest clients and compile feedback to prioritize suggested enhancements from multiple organizations.

Read full review

Celda Juby

Information Security Specialist at Dubai Health Authority

Centralized management strengthens compliance with good look and feel

From my perspective as a customer and end user, Archer has an impressive look and feel, but the most adaptive feature is its ease of configuration which helps to enhance our process according to our maturity. It's more about our organization getting centralized with an integrated approach that focuses on risk governance and compliance. When can provide a detailed dashboards to management with the details of risks from top-down or bottom-up prioritizing actions based on its criticality or necessity. This allows us to show end users and management where the issues lie and effectively demonstrate accountability and visibility in compliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good in ORM and compliance, analytics, custom reporting, features for our board including risk management, and good support for Basel regulations."

"IBM OpenPages saves time in my work as a developer."

"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."

"Everything about IBM OpenPages is valuable, particularly when compared to other solutions in the market like MetricStream, from which we switched due to its feasibility, user-friendliness, and performance."

"IBM OpenPages provides time savings in recording risk management components."

"With OpenPages, the risks and controls are registered and monitored continuously."

"The most valuable features are the workflow engine, calculations, and security rules."

"The most useful features in IBM OpenPages are the workflow features and front-end, as noted by Ian Francis, an IBM expert lab, with the workflow feature being very flexible, easy to configure, and able to help design every kind of process, while the front-end is very useful, clear, simple, and dynamic."

More IBM OpenPages pros

"It has good features and good functionality, and our customers feel there is a lot of merit in that."

"Key features are usability and ease of configuration, and it allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."

"The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."

"Key features are usability and ease of configuration. It allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."

"Since implementing MetricStream, audit teams have shaved about two weeks off of annual planning across various teams, allowing audit departments of about 140 auditors across maybe 10 teams to squeeze in 10 extra audits, one audit per each team, if not additional testing."

"MetricStream is something like an all-in-one solution where I do not need to write scripts or conduct audits."

"Overall, I would give it a nine out of ten."

"Archer allows us to define the progress of the organization's processes and helps build the right cyclic process and improve the current structure."

"Once Archer was implemented, everybody had a role to play, it was just a matter of logging in, doing the work, and moving the workflow to the next stage."

"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."

"In two to three months, even non-technical people can be masters of the product."

"RSA Archer GRC modules allow you to build efficient, collaborative enterprise governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) programs across IT, finance, operations, and legal domains."

"It is a very friendly tool, we can easily understand what is going on inside the tool, work with it for the ERP platform, create automated applications based on the requirements, and it is very secure with three levels of access at the field level, application level, and code level."

"The tool has stability, and it allows me to automate whatever process I have."

More RSA Archer pros

Cons

"IBM needs to work on pricing for organizations with around 100 users, as the licensing model is not competitive enough for SMEs."

"The reporting tools in IBM OpenPages have very strong potential because they are linked with Cognos IBM, a business intelligence tool, allowing for very good and complex reports, though creating these reports requires skills in business intelligence to get the most out of IBM OpenPages."

"Pricing! It's very expensive just for the licenses."

"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."

"Some self-relationships are not available in OpenPages' relationship model."

"IBM OpenPages could improve by adding more conditions to workflows, as some existing conditions might not work and can produce errors."

"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."

"It would be useful to have more out-of-the-box functionality, especially triggers and calculations."

More IBM OpenPages cons

"The support part is terrible, rating about one out of ten."

"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."

"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version."

"MetricStream's scalability is adaptable, though the biggest issue I have encountered with clients has been around upgrades that require re-implementing customizations to the out-of-box solutions after significant upgrades."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."

"The tech support team's turnaround time is often slow."

"It would be useful for customers if COBIT 2019 could be translated into different languages."

"Because I have not upgraded, the graphical user interface is not the current one. It is not very modern and as user-friendly as it could be."

"RSA Archer's technical support is a little disappointing because the first level is always manned by junior members who don't have much technical expertise."

"Archer has some performance issues when working on a single server."

"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."

"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SIEM solution, then it doesn't work properly."

"RSA Archer might be a bit expensive for small companies because it's a vast tool."

More RSA Archer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"They are flexible in terms of customers' needs."

"The solution’s pricing is moderate."

"The license is costly for the solution, but the remaining set up and maintenance is quite cheaper."

"I am not 100% familiar with that, especially with their new model. I just know that the way they've licensed per user to scale is good."

"The price of RSA Archer is good. The price isn't too high considering it is a leading tool in the market."

"It is not expensive. It is reasonable. We only pay for the licensing."

"Fairly highly-priced, especially for smaller companies."

"The price of the solution is very affordable."

"RSA Archer's price is justifiable and not as expensive, compared to ServiceNow. I have heard that the licensing for ServiceNow is much more expensive. I'm unaware whether there are any additional costs after licensing fees."

More RSA Archer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,998 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Healthcare Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

20%

Insurance Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM OpenPages?

There is nothing in particular that needs improvement in IBM OpenPages, although reporting could be improved to make ...

What is your primary use case for IBM OpenPages?

My customers' main use cases for IBM OpenPages include ICT risk, operational risk management, and regulatory and comp...

What advice do you have for others considering IBM OpenPages?

For those planning to use IBM OpenPages, I recommend defining exactly what you want and understanding how IBM OpenPag...

What needs improvement with MetricStream?

MetricStream can be improved in the area of developers. There are two parts of developers: those who prepare solution...

What is your primary use case for MetricStream?

My main use case for MetricStream was that I was a developer and I prepared templates for a client while also testing...

What advice do you have for others considering MetricStream?

The advice I would give to others looking into using MetricStream is to not use MetricStream. I would rate this recom...

What needs improvement with RSA Archer?

While it provides benefits in terms of security, the pricing is a bit higher than customers typically expect. It woul...

What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?

Regarding the compliance, risk, and governance tools, I am comfortable discussing the tools in the GRC category. The ...

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Archer?

I have been in touch with about three companies who use RSA Archer actively in the compliance area. These companies u...

Formalize vs IBM OpenPages

Comparisons

Compared 5% of the time

ConvergePoint Policy Management Software vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 5% of the time

NAVEX Global vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 4% of the time

SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 4% of the time

SAS Enterprise GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM OpenPages Competitors

AuditBoard vs MetricStream

Compared 7% of the time

Mitratech Prevalent vs MetricStream

Compared 6% of the time

Resolver GRC Suite vs MetricStream

Compared 5% of the time

Nasdaq BWise vs MetricStream

Compared 5% of the time

Enablon vs MetricStream

Compared 4% of the time

More MetricStream Competitors

OneTrust GRC vs RSA Archer

Compared 6% of the time

AuditBoard vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

LogicManager vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

NAVEX Global vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs RSA Archer

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA Archer Competitors

Product Reports

Download IBM OpenPages product report

GRC

April 2026

Download MetricStream product report

May 2026

Download RSA Archer product report

RSA Archer

May 2026

Also Known As

OpenPages

No data available

Archer

Overview

IBM OpenPages provides a robust platform for reporting, content management, and workflows. Its integration with Cognos supports advanced reporting alongside enhanced risk management, compliance, and workflow capabilities catering to complex operational needs.

IBM OpenPages stands out as a comprehensive platform that integrates rich reporting and risk management features. Cognos integration allows access to standard reports, charts, and dashboards, enhancing analytic capabilities. Valuable functionalities include compliance support, workflow flexibility, and a user-centric front-end experience. Its centralized risk management framework and effective information-sharing capabilities make it highly reliable. Strong data extraction and API integrations further its utility, particularly appreciated in industries for operational risk management and policy enforcement. However, areas such as integration with external data systems, navigation improvements, and more competitive pricing for smaller enterprises offer scope for enhancement.

What are the key features of IBM OpenPages?

Reporting: Offers insightful standard reports, charts, and dashboards.
Risk Management: Centralized framework for effective risk sharing.
Content Management: Integrates with workflows for comprehensive management.
Compliance Support: Robust functionalities that support compliance needs.
Workflow Flexibility: Adaptable workflows catering to varied needs.
User-Friendly Front-End: Designed for ease of use and effectiveness.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Centralized Risk Management: Effective sharing and management of risk information.
Robust Data Extraction: Enhanced data handling through strong extraction capabilities.
API Integrations: Supports diverse functionalities through API connections.
Performance: Often outperforming alternatives like MetricStream.
Operational Utility: Widely used for operational risk management.

IBM OpenPages is predominantly used in financial services to manage risks related to operations, IT, ESG, data privacy, compliance, and audits. Its capabilities in scenario planning, reporting, dashboards, and IT governance support users across different sectors in effective control management, risk assessments, and workflows, backed by integrated tools and document management features.

IBM

MetricStream is a cloud-based platform providing robust audit, compliance, and risk management tools. Users enjoy features like mobile interfaces and centralized risk libraries, though some report interface flow issues and technical support challenges.

MetricStream stands out for its audit, risk, and compliance capabilities, delivering customizable and standardized risk management across departments. Its comprehensive dashboards and reporting tools streamline compliance processes, reducing planning time and breaking down silos. Though described as a pricier option, it efficiently integrates risk elements and supports users with mobile interfaces and cloud availability. Areas for improvement include enhancing security integration, improving interface flow, and boosting support services, particularly from India.

What features does MetricStream offer?

Mobile-Friendly Interfaces: Provides easy access to risk and compliance tools on mobile devices.
Cloud Availability: Ensures scalability and data accessibility across regions.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Offers detailed insights for compliance and audit processes.
Centralized Risk Libraries: Facilitates standardized risk management across departments.
Robust Reporting Tools: Enhances governance with detailed reports and analytics.

What benefits can users find in MetricStream reviews?

Reduces Silos: Streamlines processes and improves communication across departments.
Saves Planning Time: Offers efficient audit process management and compliance adherence.
Efficient Integration: Combines risk elements effectively for comprehensive governance.

System integrators utilize MetricStream in audit and risk management, focusing on template preparation and UI testing. They assemble components like Lego pieces, but face challenges with larger solutions requiring developer participation for code alterations. Initial implementation is often delayed by India-based technical support, impacting operations. Enterprise and Operations Risk Management are commonly employed with MetricStream, highlighting its industry relevance.