We performed a comparison between OneTrust GRC and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"Vendors can be assessed and rated out of the tool, and assessments can be scheduled for updates at certain intervals."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"Flexible record permissions and data import features."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"Its user interface is pretty neat, and there is flexibility in generating the data. You can customize reports at any level. You can directly get reports in Tableau format. If you want to generate statistical data, you can create reports with graphs. There is an adequate amount of flexibility for changing the format, the type of graphs, etc."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"Makes auditing much more convenient."
"The last project was for an investment group that was using Excel. Shifting their records from one position to another took approximately 15 minutes. In Archer, we created a workflow for them to leverage it, and they could send the single record with one click to one person within seconds. The whole process went from 15 minutes to two minutes to get the approval for the records. The main purpose of Archer is to just make it easy."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"There are limitations to customized workflow automation, and they need to increase both the available automation and the customized workflow."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"The technology's a little outdated."
"Recently, we made a suggestion for cross references, like for one application to another. There were limitations there, so we're hoping that will be included in the next upgrade."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
"Slow turnaround time from support team."
"It would be useful for customers if COBIT 2019 could be translated into different languages."
"The design and advanced workflow need to be improved."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
OneTrust GRC is ranked 4th in GRC with 6 reviews while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. OneTrust GRC is rated 7.6, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OneTrust GRC writes "Costly solution that may not guarantee ROI, but remains effective in IT risk management ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". OneTrust GRC is most compared with ProcessUnity, AuditBoard, Workiva Wdesk, LogicGate and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk, AuditBoard and Snow Governance & Risk. See our OneTrust GRC vs. RSA Archer report.
See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.