We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere DataStage and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance optimization is quite good in DataStage. It provides parallelism and pipelining mechanisms"
"ETL is the most valuable feature."
"The Hierarchical Data Stage is good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to incorporate very complex business rules in Data Stage."
"The solution has improved the time it takes to perform tasks related to batch applications."
"The solution's scalability is really good...we are using multi-instance jobs where you can scale them easily."
"Finding logs is very easy on the solution."
"IBM is stable and accurate to monitor. It's easy to understand to monitor the data lineage from source to target."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The installation process is easy."
"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"It would be useful to provide support for Python, AR, and Java."
"The response time from support is slow and needs to be improved."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"It would be great if they can include some basic version of data quality checking features."
"DataStage is quite expensive. It is too hard to find a consultant using DataStage in Turkey."
"The interface needs improvement. It is really too technical. That is the main problem."
"Reduced cost would allow more customers to choose the product. It's quite expensive in relation to the cost of other similar solutions."
"In the future, I would like to see more integration with cloud technologies."
"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
IBM InfoSphere DataStage is ranked 7th in Data Integration with 37 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. IBM InfoSphere DataStage is rated 7.8, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere DataStage writes "User-friendly with a lot of functions for transmission rules, but has slow performance and not suitable for a huge volume of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". IBM InfoSphere DataStage is most compared with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, SSIS, Azure Data Factory, Talend Open Studio and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Talend Open Studio. See our IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.