Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs Informatica PowerCenter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM InfoSphere DataStage ROI varies; optimization boosts performance 200%, enhancing project management despite some inefficiencies and manual interventions.
Sentiment score
8.1
Informatica PowerCenter offers flexibility and stability, optimizing data handling and decision-making, ensuring high-quality investment returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
IBM InfoSphere DataStage support is 24/7 but inconsistent, with quality varying by region and needing efficiency improvements.
Sentiment score
6.9
Informatica PowerCenter's technical support is praised for responsiveness and efficiency, though customer service is perceived less favorably.
We also have the flexibility to submit a feature request to be included as part of the wishlist, potentially becoming a product feature in subsequent releases.
IBM tech support has allocated dedicated resources, making it satisfactory.
I like the technical support provided by Informatica.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
IBM InfoSphere DataStage is praised for scalability and connectivity but some users find scaling resource-intensive.
Sentiment score
6.8
Informatica PowerCenter efficiently scales data management with flexible cloud options, despite cost concerns and on-premise limitations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
IBM InfoSphere DataStage is generally stable, though newer versions and installation issues on certain OS may impact stability.
Sentiment score
7.8
Informatica PowerCenter is praised for reliability and performance, with minimal issues and high stability ratings from users.
Informatica PowerCenter is stable and can scale well.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM InfoSphere DataStage needs usability improvements, modern database support, better pricing, documentation, stability, and enhanced cloud integration and DevOps.
Informatica PowerCenter struggles with high costs, complex UI, outdated features, scalability issues, and lacks modern technology integration.
The solution needs improvement in connectivity with big data technologies such as Spark.
I wonder if it supports other areas, such as cloud environments with open source support, or EdgeShift.
Utilizing more stored procedures from Oracle databases in an easy way would significantly boost performance.
 

Setup Cost

IBM InfoSphere DataStage is costly for small businesses but competitive for large enterprises, cheaper than Informatica yet pricey overall.
Informatica PowerCenter is a powerful but costly data solution, ideal for large enterprises but challenging for smaller ones.
Pricing for IBM InfoSphere DataStage is moderate and not much expensive.
I find that the pricing and licensing for Informatica PowerCenter align with its quality.
 

Valuable Features

IBM InfoSphere DataStage excels in parallel processing, scalability, robust data integration, and ease of use, enhancing data management efficiency.
Informatica PowerCenter offers robust data integration, real-time processing, and user-friendly interfaces, enhancing decision-making and enterprise data management.
The failure detection has been very useful for us, as well as the load balancing feature.
As we are a financial organization, security is our main concern, so we prefer enterprise tools.
The system supports real-time integration, which is essential for many of my tasks.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere DataStage
Ranking in Data Integration
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Informatica PowerCenter
Ranking in Data Integration
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Data Visualization (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere DataStage is 5.2%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Informatica PowerCenter is 9.4%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Q&A Highlights

Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 07, 2019
 

Featured Reviews

Rahul Saxena - PeerSpot reviewer
A helpful and cost-effective tool that performs well and is very easy to use
I deal with companies from the healthcare industry. The solutions are largely cloud-based. In data-rich industries like telecom or BFSI, such tools are extensively used. Healthcare also has a lot of data. I will encourage people to use the solution. It is quite an easy tool. Every stage has a help guide. It’s an extensive documentation. We can understand the purpose of a stage, how the connection has to be set up, how to set up a username and password, and whom we should contact. New users must start using the tool and explore it. They might have to invest ten days or two weeks to understand the workflows and options. It is easy to learn. My company is a partner with IBM. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Lars Borchers - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and reliable product that provides a variety of features for data integration
The solution is not for newcomers. It has an old touch. The solution must improve the integration with new services. It was part of the program at Informatica when they moved to their cloud platform. It is integrated. However, from an on-premise perspective, we need to buy licenses for PowerExchange. If we want a native driver to access a special service, we need to extend our license to those services. It is expensive. I don't like that it's not all included in the solution.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user90069 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2014
Informatica PowerCenter vs. Microsoft SSIS - each technology has its advantages but also have similarities
Technology has made it easier for businesses to organize and manipulate data to get a clearer picture of what’s going on with their business. Notably, ETL tools have made managing huge amounts of data significantly easier and faster, boosting many organizations’ business intelligence operations…
 

Answers from the Community

Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 7, 2019
Oct 7, 2019
My experience with both of these tools is that differences are not that meaningful. Informatica has nicer UI but that's it. For 95% of projects one will not feel a difference nor from a performance point of view nor from development speed (assuming that you have developers experienced equally in both tools). So I would take into consideration the following factors: 1. Do you have specific r...
2 out of 3 answers
CL
Jun 14, 2019
In short, Informatica PowerCenter has tighter integration across its portfolio for a better user experience. In data quality, Informatica supports non-technical audiences such as data stewards more than IBM. Because the data management landscape has a number of applications (see note 1) that apply to different use cases, I recommend that you talk with Informatica to discuss your requirements. That conversation can provide insights into which tool - or more likely tools or solutions - that will help inform your next phase of product research. Please contact my colleague Bill Campbell (bicampbell@informatica.com, +1 512.813.2894) to schedule a call. --- Note 1 --- Data management applications include (but are not limited to) data integration, data quality, master data management, data governance and stewardship, data catalog, and more. In addition to the basic tools, there are: * Variations that are on-premise, cloud, or hybrid (Informatica offers all three) * Point products doing single task versus out-of-the-box solutions that incorporate various tools integrated together (Informatica has both products and solutions) * Vendors that have only a single point product versus vendors that have a complete portfolio of products that can be sold standalone or "better together" in a solution (Informatica has the complete portfolio with products and solutions - built on the Intelligent Data Platform ) Gartner has five Magic Quadrants for the data management market. Besides the famed 2x2 graphic for each tool category, the research notes provide good foundational information about each market. Download complimentary copies of all five MQs for at this link: https://www.informatica.com/lp/gartner-leadership.html
KK
Jun 16, 2019
My experience with both of these tools is that differences are not that meaningful. Informatica has nicer UI but that's it. For 95% of projects one will not feel a difference nor from a performance point of view nor from development speed (assuming that you have developers experienced equally in both tools). So I would take into consideration the following factors: 1. Do you have specific requirements that can be addressed by each of these tools (you can check it by conducting PoC) 2. What will be a cost of the tool: 2.1 What technology is known to your developers? (training costs, time required to master technology by your developers, resources availability ) 2.2 What is the license cost? I do not want to diminish both technologies, but from a cost perspective, I know that it is worth to consider them only when you have daily more than 200 GB data with high to medium transformation complexity. Otherwise, there are cheaper tools on the market.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Would you upgrade to more premium versions of IBM InfoSphere DataStage?
My company currently uses the free version of the product, and we are definitely switching to a paid one. We needed a tool that can help us not only integrate our data but use it effectively. For ...
Is IBM InfoSphere DataStage more difficult to use compared to other tools in the field?
I think the tool may cause some difficulties if you have not used other data integration solutions before. I have worked at companies that used different tools for data integration, and they work ...
Do you rely on IBM Cloud Paks for your data? Have you utilized this product, or do you use IBM InfoSphere DataStage without it?
IBM Cloud Paks makes a big difference in your data integration. My company has been using it alongside IBM InfoSphere DataStage and while the main product is good on its own, this one truly expands...
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?
Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...
Which is better - SSIS or Informatica PowerCenter?
SSIS PowerPack is a group of drag and drop connectors for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, commonly called SSIS. The collection helps organizations boost productivity with code-free compo...
Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?
Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...
 

Also Known As

No data available
PowerCenter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dubai Statistics Center, Etisalat Egypt
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, LexisNexis, Rabobank
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs. Informatica PowerCenter and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.