Hyland OnBase vs Pillir comparison

Hyland and Pillir are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6, while Pillir is ranked #34. Hyland holds a 2.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Pillir’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pillir users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

4,371 Views
962 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

378 Views
295 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Pillir

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Pillir compete in enterprise content management and application development platforms. Pillir seems to have the upper hand due to its modernization capabilities and rapid deployment.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers robust document management, workflow automation, and case management tools. It is also known for its integration capabilities and comprehensive solution suite. Pillir focuses on modernizing legacy systems, features a low-code environment for rapid application development, and excels in providing modernization tools.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise for customization. It could benefit from improved usability. Pillir needs to enhance its support resources and address performance issues during peak times. Additionally, it should focus on refining its technical support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase has extensive deployment options but often needs significant time and resources for full implementation. Customer service receives mixed reviews, with some delays in support. Pillir has quick deployment times and an efficient onboarding process. Its customer support is generally responsive, though there are occasional lapses.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase has higher upfront setup costs, but offers long-term value translating into a positive ROI. Pillir has lower initial costs and faster deployment, providing a more immediate ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Pillir

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

34th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (42nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pillir is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hyland OnBase	2.4%
Pillir	0.8%
Other	96.8%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Seamless data management enhances security while monolithic architecture and reporting need improvements

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco and Nuxeo. Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

Read full review

it_user130401

Application Developer Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model

I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment. We have people going through all of their shifts without connectivity, yet it automatically later synchronizes well with SAP, without creating extra documents or anything like that. The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us. I love how easy it is to manage the design of the process using drag and drop. I know they are working to make the developer experience even better, and I'm very excited about it. The modernizer element that converts existing ABAP business logic to the cloud-native mobile-friendly solution is a very powerful tool that I haven't seen in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

Cons

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The tool's price is high."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

I was a vendor managing Hyland OnBase ( /products/hyland-onbase-reviews ) for Hyland, not as a direct user but as a business partner. We managed the solution and were a partner with Hyland.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Mendix vs Pillir

Compared 100% of the time

More Pillir Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

December 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

November 2025

Download Pillir product report

Also Known As

OnBase

appsFreedom

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir

December 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.