Pillir vs QuickBase comparison

Pillir and Quickbase are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Pillir is ranked #42, while Quickbase is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Pillir holds a 0.4% mindshare in RADS, compared to Quickbase’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pillir users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

295 Views
204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

1,895 Views
1,289 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Pillir

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

QuickBase and Pillir are both robust application development platforms. QuickBase is often highlighted for its ease of use and strong integrations, while Pillir is noted for its offline functionality and robust SAP integration.

Features: QuickBase offers extensive app-building capabilities, flexibility, and strong integrations. Pillir stands out with rapid modernization of legacy systems, offline capabilities, and robust SAP integration.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase needs improvements in performance speed, more comprehensive customer support, and better scalability. Pillir could benefit from a more intuitive learning curve, additional documentation, and enhanced user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service. Pillir has efficient SAP integration but requires technical expertise for deployment and could improve its customer support accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: QuickBase offers competitive pricing with decent ROI, though some users feel it could be more cost-effective. Pillir's setup costs are higher, justified by significant long-term ROI through improved operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Pillir vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pillir vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pillir

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

42nd

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

39th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QuickBase

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

18th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Employee Time Tracking Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Pillir is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
QuickBase	1.8%
Pillir	0.4%
Other	97.8%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

it_user130401

Application Developer Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model

I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment. We have people going through all of their shifts without connectivity, yet it automatically later synchronizes well with SAP, without creating extra documents or anything like that. The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us. I love how easy it is to manage the design of the process using drag and drop. I know they are working to make the developer experience even better, and I'm very excited about it. The modernizer element that converts existing ABAP business logic to the cloud-native mobile-friendly solution is a very powerful tool that I haven't seen in the market.

Read full review

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Empowers content management and application creation without SQL

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."

"I am impressed with the product's automation which makes everything easy."

"Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed)."

"This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data."

"I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures."

"The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency."

"The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge."

"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

"They could enhance the ability to link records between tables directly without the need for additional automation to increase space and time."

"Whenever we do onboarding, or we get new employees, there tends to be a delay of not just a week but a couple of weeks, and sometimes even a few weeks of being able to see certain new employees in the system."

"The user interface of Quick Base is complex."

"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."

"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."

"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."

"I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

University

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

See all answers

Comparisons

Mendix vs Pillir

Compared 100% of the time

More Pillir Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 11% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 8% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

November 2025

Download Pillir product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

December 2025

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

appsFreedom

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

Pillir vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Free Report: Pillir vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about Pillir vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pillir vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.