Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pillir vs QuickBase comparison

Pillir and Quickbase are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Pillir is ranked #47, while Quickbase is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.6. Pillir holds a 0.1% mindshare in RADS, compared to Quickbase’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pillir users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.
Pillir
Read 2 Pillir reviews
  • 124 Views
  • 17 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
QuickBase
Read 75 QuickBase reviews
  • 1,759 Views
  • 470 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

QuickBase and Pillir are both robust application development platforms. QuickBase is often highlighted for its ease of use and strong integrations, while Pillir is noted for its offline functionality and robust SAP integration.

Features: QuickBase offers extensive app-building capabilities, flexibility, and strong integrations. Pillir stands out with rapid modernization of legacy systems, offline capabilities, and robust SAP integration.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase needs improvements in performance speed, more comprehensive customer support, and better scalability. Pillir could benefit from a more intuitive learning curve, additional documentation, and enhanced user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service. Pillir has efficient SAP integration but requires technical expertise for deployment and could improve its customer support accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: QuickBase offers competitive pricing with decent ROI, though some users feel it could be more cost-effective. Pillir's setup costs are higher, justified by significant long-term ROI through improved operational efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Pillir vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Pillir vs. QuickBase
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pillir
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
47th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
47th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QuickBase
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
17th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Pillir is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

principl247992 - PeerSpot reviewer
Intuitive and easy to use with almost no coding
The ability to analyze the business logic built over the years in ABAP and then convert it was pretty amazing. This is the first time I saw a solution that offers something like that. While obviously, it can't convert 100% of the logic (we had over 30,000 lines of code in this process alone), it did pretty well. Afterward, my team had to go in and complete the rest - using drag and drop - almost with no use of code. I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use.
Read full review
Bhavatha Ranjanni S - PeerSpot reviewer
Its extensive scope allows multiple users with diverse professional backgrounds to engage on a single platform
When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants. The recent changes have increased costs based on user activity, such as viewing reports or interacting with specific fields. This shift makes QuickBase more expensive to use as activity increases. Lowering these costs could potentially broaden QuickBase's user base, similar to how Microsoft PowerApps operates. The visualization in QuickBase could be enhanced. Due to cost and usage efficiency concerns, our utilization of QuickBase is limited within our company. A few individuals are currently utilizing QuickBase. We need to consider the cost-to-usage ratio and prioritize increasing adoption.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment."
"Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed)."
"Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."
"The product is easy to use."
"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."
"There's a lot of stability in QuickBase...I really appreciate the processing part of QuickBase, especially considering how we're able to get information in real time instead of having to wait."
"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."
"One of the valuable features of Quick Base is its ability to function as a content management system without the need for SQL."
More QuickBase pros
 

Cons

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
"When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants."
"This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve.​"
"Access to more standard default layouts and sample builds would be useful, and access to more training on use and flexibility."
"Whenever we do onboarding, or we get new employees, there tends to be a delay of not just a week but a couple of weeks, and sometimes even a few weeks of being able to see certain new employees in the system."
"They could enhance the ability to link records between tables directly without the need for additional automation to increase space and time."
"The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals."
"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."
"It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."
More QuickBase cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."
"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."
"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."
"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."
"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."
"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."
"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."
"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."
"The product is cheap when compared to other products."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
61%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.
See all answers
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase
Compared 27% of the time
ServiceNow vs QuickBase Logo
ServiceNow vs QuickBase
Compared 20% of the time
OutSystems vs QuickBase Logo
OutSystems vs QuickBase
Compared 12% of the time
Mendix vs QuickBase Logo
Mendix vs QuickBase
Compared 9% of the time
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs QuickBase Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs QuickBase
Compared 7% of the time
More QuickBase Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Rapid Application Development Software
June 2025
Pillir reportDownload Pillir product report
Buyer's Guide
QuickBase
June 2025
QuickBase reportDownload QuickBase product report
 

Also Known As

appsFreedom
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase
 

Sample Customers

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Buyer's Guide
Pillir vs. QuickBase
June 2025
Free Report: Pillir vs. QuickBase
Find out what your peers are saying about Pillir vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Pillir vs. QuickBase report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.