HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs Infraon IMS comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.5, while EverestIMS is ranked #33. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.8% mindshare in SM, compared to EverestIMS’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

HPE Integrated Lights Out (...

Read 2 HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) reviews

1,406 Views
1,406 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

3,316 Views
995 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Integrated Lights Out (...

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Infraon IMS and HPE Integrated Lights Out compete in infrastructure management. Infraon IMS has advantages in pricing and support, making it cost-effective for some customers, while HPE iLO has robust features for those prioritizing comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Infraon IMS provides extensive network management functionalities, customizable dashboards, and adaptable infrastructure solutions. HPE iLO offers advanced remote management, sophisticated hardware monitoring, and strong security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infraon IMS ensures a seamless deployment with exceptional customer service, aiding smooth onboarding. HPE iLO requires a more complex deployment, supported by an experienced team, suiting organizations with dedicated IT staff.

Pricing and ROI: Infraon IMS presents a favorable initial setup cost, providing attractive ROI due to low upfront investment. HPE iLO, though more expensive, justifies its price with innovative features and possibly higher long-term value for enterprises needing advanced infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Integrated Lights Out (...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Server Monitoring

33rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (82nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (56th), Cloud Monitoring Software (49th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 1.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)	1.8%
Infraon IMS	1.6%
Other	96.6%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mostafigur Rahman

Senior System Engineer at Omgea Exim Ltd

Provides real-time monitoring and exceptional technical support

As a reseller, I think HP iLO can be improved in a few ways. HP has a lot of experience with iLO, but they need to work on synchronization between iLO and the system hardware. Sometimes when the system fails, iLO doesn't get the proper information from the system, so there's a need for improvement so it can provide real-time information for our engineers to give the correct solutions to customers. The only room for improvement I see is synchronization with the current hardware and socket because sometimes hardware fails, but the information is delayed on iLO. There are points of view where iLO logs and some logs are missing from the system, which prevents our engineers from finding the correct solution. We need to inform HP to improve their hardware part for better synchronization to ensure all the necessary information fills up properly in the logs.

Read full review

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) has the best features for detecting any kind of hardware failure, such as any DIMM, HDD, system board, or PSU failures, providing real-time alarms with all necessary information."

"HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is user-friendly, offering easy navigation and a nice GUI."

"Being an engineering product, the customization is easy for us compared to SolarWinds and ManageEngine."

"Once we installed this central system, our site engineers who provide the data started believing in the data's accuracy."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"Infraon IMS allows us to do several things from a single window, which is important to us."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"Overall, it's a wonderful one-stop ITSM solution for infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"I am currently avoiding HPE in my current build because of the pricing that is almost highway robbery. Service contracts are required to receive firmware updates."

"Sometimes when the system fails, iLO doesn't get the proper information from the system, so there's a need for improvement so it can provide real-time information for our engineers to give the correct solutions to customers."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)?

Regarding pricing or set-up costs and licensing, HPE's approach is quite intense compared to Dell, Cisco, Microsoft, Lenovo, etc. Avoiding HPE in the current structure due to high costs would be co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)?

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is used for monitoring the system; we have almost 115 or 116, around 150 servers, and we use this product to check the server current status with alarms and all othe...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 21% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 17% of the time

Huawei iBMC vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 8% of the time

VMware vCenter vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) Competitors

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

August 2026

Download HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

August 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Everest IMS

Overview

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is a powerful remote server management tool that enhances efficiency by allowing IT administrators to manage servers from anywhere, ensuring seamless operations.

HPE iLO provides a comprehensive suite for remote server management, designed to streamline tasks like server configuration and health monitoring. Ideal for both SMBs and large enterprises, it enables administrators to access critical server information remotely. This functionality maximizes uptime, reduces operational costs, and enhances productivity, becoming an essential tool in modern data centers.

What are the key features of HPE iLO?

Remote Console Access: Enables full remote control over server operations.
Integrated Remote Console (IRC): Supports virtual media and secure data connection.
Health Monitoring: Provides real-time health status and robust diagnostics.
Embedded Media Controller: Adds convenience for firmware updates and management tasks.
Power Management: Optimizes power consumption efficiency to lower costs.

What benefits and ROI should be considered when evaluating HPE iLO?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for physical presence, saving travel costs.
Time Savings: Streamlines management processes, saving precious time.
Enhanced Security: Provides secure access to ensure data safety.
Improved Uptime: Reduces downtime with proactive monitoring and alerts.
Scalability: Supports growth without a significant increase in management resources.

In various industries like healthcare, finance, and telecommunications, HPE iLO is implemented to optimize IT infrastructures by offering remote diagnostics, rapid issue resolution, and enhanced server performance. Its comprehensive set of tools allows industries to maintain high operational standards while minimizing intervention times.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS

August 2026

Free Report: HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.