HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs Infraon IMS comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.5, while EverestIMS is ranked #35. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 2.6% mindshare in SM, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

HPE Integrated Lights Out (...

Read 2 HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) reviews

565 Views
565 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

1,027 Views
257 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Integrated Lights Out (...

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Infraon IMS and HPE Integrated Lights Out compete in IT infrastructure management. Infraon IMS stands out in pricing and support satisfaction, while HPE iLO is favored for its robust features.

Features: Infraon IMS offers real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, and comprehensive network visibility. HPE iLO includes advanced server management, remote diagnostics, and automation. Infraon focuses on customizable monitoring, whereas HPE iLO emphasizes automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infraon IMS provides a cloud-based model with responsive support, enabling quicker onboarding. HPE iLO integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure but requires more complex configuration. Infraon IMS allows faster deployment with proactive support, while HPE iLO offers detailed setup with robust technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Infraon IMS attracts cost-conscious buyers with its affordable setup, showing a quicker ROI due to lower initial costs. HPE iLO, despite higher upfront expenses, offers extensive long-term benefits. Infraon IMS is suitable for budget-friendly investments, while HPE iLO realizes ROI over time through enhanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Integrated Lights Out (...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Server Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (90th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (56th), Cloud Monitoring Software (52nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is 2.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)	2.6%
Infraon IMS	0.9%
Other	96.5%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Alexander Monahan

Senior Systems Administrator at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Positive access capabilities and user-friendly interface empower efficient server management while cost and licensing concerns persist

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is user-friendly, offering easy navigation and a nice GUI. It provides an alternative network connection, enabling access to servers without physical access. The software is highly valued for its ability to bring servers back up remotely, essential for minimizing downtime in critical situations. HPE iLO is a strong competitor to iDRAC. Being a second network interface physically installed on a server, iLO provides an extra IP to access the server, bypassing other layers such as ESXi or Proxmox, and enabling BIOS-level access. The remote software involved is fantastic for recovering servers quickly and efficiently when they go down, providing significant improvements to organizational operations. Whether dealing with international or local solutions, iLO can save considerable time, reducing downtime from minutes to weeks depending on location. It is particularly useful for integrating with Microsoft Active Directory, simplifying login issues, and mitigating risks of login leaks through Multi-Factor Authentication. The quick response times from HPE support, including shipping parts and sending techs promptly, add to the overall efficiency and reliability of solutions involving HPE iLO. The integration of iLO with vSphere provides a seamless user experience, making navigation feel consistent across platforms.

Read full review

Maharajan S

VSO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization

The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is user-friendly, offering easy navigation and a nice GUI."

"HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) has the best features for detecting any kind of hardware failure, such as any DIMM, HDD, system board, or PSU failures, providing real-time alarms with all necessary information."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

Cons

"I am currently avoiding HPE in my current build because of the pricing that is almost highway robbery. Service contracts are required to receive firmware updates."

"Sometimes when the system fails, iLO doesn't get the proper information from the system, so there's a need for improvement so it can provide real-time information for our engineers to give the correct solutions to customers."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)?

Regarding pricing or set-up costs and licensing, HPE's approach is quite intense compared to Dell, Cisco, Microsoft, Lenovo, etc. Avoiding HPE in the current structure due to high costs would be co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)?

As a reseller, I think HP iLO can be improved in a few ways. HP has a lot of experience with iLO, but they need to work on synchronization between iLO and the system hardware. Sometimes when the sy...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)?

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is used for monitoring the system; we have almost 115 or 116, around 150 servers, and we use this product to check the server current status with alarms and all othe...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 56% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 16% of the time

Huawei iBMC vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 11% of the time

NinjaOne vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 9% of the time

VMware vCenter vs HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO)

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) Competitors

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 14% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 13% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Infraon IMS

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

January 2026

Download HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

January 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Everest IMS

Overview

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) is a powerful remote server management tool that enhances efficiency by allowing IT administrators to manage servers from anywhere, ensuring seamless operations.

HPE iLO provides a comprehensive suite for remote server management, designed to streamline tasks like server configuration and health monitoring. Ideal for both SMBs and large enterprises, it enables administrators to access critical server information remotely. This functionality maximizes uptime, reduces operational costs, and enhances productivity, becoming an essential tool in modern data centers.

What are the key features of HPE iLO?

Remote Console Access: Enables full remote control over server operations.
Integrated Remote Console (IRC): Supports virtual media and secure data connection.
Health Monitoring: Provides real-time health status and robust diagnostics.
Embedded Media Controller: Adds convenience for firmware updates and management tasks.
Power Management: Optimizes power consumption efficiency to lower costs.

What benefits and ROI should be considered when evaluating HPE iLO?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for physical presence, saving travel costs.
Time Savings: Streamlines management processes, saving precious time.
Enhanced Security: Provides secure access to ensure data safety.
Improved Uptime: Reduces downtime with proactive monitoring and alerts.
Scalability: Supports growth without a significant increase in management resources.

In various industries like healthcare, finance, and telecommunications, HPE iLO is implemented to optimize IT infrastructures by offering remote diagnostics, rapid issue resolution, and enhanced server performance. Its comprehensive set of tools allows industries to maintain high operational standards while minimizing intervention times.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS

January 2026

Free Report: HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Integrated Lights Out (iLO) vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.