Bamboo vs Harness comparison

Read 7 Harness reviews

2,800 Views
1,932 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bamboo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Bamboo and Harness compete in the continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) space. Harness appears to have the upper hand with advanced features providing a compelling reason for its cost.

Features: Bamboo offers strong integration capabilities with various Atlassian products, making it valuable for teams using Atlassian tools. Its customization capabilities thrive in standardized environments. Harness provides innovative automation and AI-driven features that enhance deployment efficiency. Its continuous verification tools are pivotal for rapid detection and rollback of faulty deployments, and the ability to create dynamic pipelines with minimal effort gives Harness a distinctive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo demonstrates ease of use with robust documentation and community support, simplifying deployment for teams familiar with Atlassian products. Harness shines in its simplified deployment model using AI, offering an intuitive setup that reduces manual configuration and errors. It provides strong customer support with tailored assistance advantageous for complex scenarios, appealing to teams seeking to minimize manual interventions.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo's pricing model is cost-effective, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises within existing Atlassian ecosystems. Its setup costs are low, providing strong ROI for teams using Atlassian. Harness, with a higher upfront cost, offers substantial ROI in dynamic environments by reducing deployment failures and operational overhead through its automation capabilities, valuable for organizations prioritizing cutting-edge CI/CD processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Bamboo vs. Harness Report (Updated: February 2026).

Bamboo vs. Harness

Download the complete report

Helped 882,813 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.4

Bamboo yielded high returns with low costs, boosting efficiency and saving time, translating to significant financial gains.

Sentiment score

8.6

Harness improves efficiency, reduces deployment and development time, increases success rates, and offers positive ROI with low maintenance costs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.

Technical Associate at ZS

I believe the efficiency improvement is more than a twenty to thirty percent increase compared to Jenkins.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.2

Bamboo support is generally helpful, but users note service delays and prefer forums; satisfaction rates 6 to 8 out of 10.

Sentiment score

8.1

Harness offers efficient and proactive support with quick resolution and communication, often allowing internal teams to manage incidents.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.

SAURAB K GANGURDE

Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators

We have been receiving incident reports whenever an incident occurs on Harness, and they are usually quick to respond.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.4

Bamboo's scalability is generally praised, but opinions vary based on remote agent technology and resource allocation challenges.

Sentiment score

7.8

Harness provides highly scalable SaaS for teams, efficiently managing applications with minimal performance issues, ideal for enterprise growth.

If you need more agents, you just switch on more agents.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.

Technical Associate at ZS

Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.

Ravi Hanok

Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Currently, out of twenty teams that are supposed to adopt it, five or six have adopted Harness, and we have not seen any kind of scalability issues, such as slowness in performance or build time reduction.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.8

Bamboo is generally stable, with most issues resolved by upgrades; users rate it highly for robustness and stability.

Sentiment score

7.5

Harness is stable with smooth production performance, though issues arise with over twenty applications and rare downtime reports.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.

SAURAB K GANGURDE

Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators

Harness is decently stable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

Room For Improvement

Bamboo requires better user-friendliness, plugin support, integration, API improvements, and enhanced deployment models for enhanced developer experience.

Harness needs improvements in clarity, setup simplification, security, automation, stability, UI, pipeline support, onboarding, and flexible pricing.

Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

There is no way to execute nested pipelines, which means that we cannot execute child pipelines within child pipelines and child pipelines even within those child pipelines.

Technical Associate at ZS

Harness can be improved by providing more clarity on the credits it issues for Harness Cloud, as it has a tiered pricing structure involving license and credit costs, which can get confusing.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur.

Ravi Hanok

Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Setup Cost

Bamboo enterprise pricing starts at $2000, with agent-based fees rising to $120,000 annually, prompting calls for flexible models.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Technical Associate at ZS

Valuable Features

Bamboo offers seamless Atlassian integration, customizable CI/CD pipelines, extensive automation, and third-party support, valued for ease of use.

Harness accelerates deployment with intelligent caching, AI error detection, enhanced safety, and improved team coordination and compliance visibility.

The main benefits Bamboo provides for me and my team are the automation to pick up code changes and automate the deployments, building images.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bamboo report

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.

Ravi Hanok

Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Harness offers several best features that I have worked with, including an intelligent caching system for dependencies and artifact building that allows for extremely short build times without extra bash scripting.

For more quotes and insights, download the Harness report

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The best features in Harness are its user-friendliness and setup configuration.

SAURAB K GANGURDE

Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Harness

Ranking in Build Automation

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th), Cloud Cost Management (7th), Feature Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 4.3%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 5.5%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Harness	5.5%
Bamboo	4.3%
Other	90.2%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

Templatized pipelines have improved efficiency while limitations in code-based development remain

Technical Associate at ZS

Harness UI can do a lot of good things. Harness's UI should not feel very complicated. At the current stage, it feels very commercialized and compared to other platforms such as Argo CD or Jenkins, which feel much more lively and much more simple. Infrastructure as code or pipeline as code is something that Harness severely lacks. There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code. Pipeline as code is definitely one of the disadvantages when it comes to Harness. Additionally, the entire platform feels very commercialized, which is something that a lot of developers, especially open-source enthusiasts, might not appreciate even within the organization. One of the very important key factors I observed was that there is no way to execute nested pipelines, which means that we cannot execute child pipelines within child pipelines and child pipelines even within those child pipelines. There is no way to execute nested pipeline execution, which may or may not be required based on the use case, but it is definitely one of those features that I wish the platform had.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user217035

Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 27, 2015

Bamboo vs. Jenkins

A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?

Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bamboo?

I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five.

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

What needs improvement with Harness?

The first point for improvement is the steep learning curve, where concepts such as services, environment, pipelines, and templates take time to understand. New users often need training before bec...

What is your primary use case for Harness?

My main use case for Harness is continuous deployment (CD), specifically for safe, automated deployment to production, especially in Kubernetes and cloud environments. For continuous deployment in ...

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Comparisons

GitLab vs Bamboo

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 12% of the time

Tekton vs Bamboo

Compared 9% of the time

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 8% of the time

Chef vs Bamboo

Compared 6% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Compared 14% of the time

Jenkins vs Harness

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 6% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 6% of the time

LaunchDarkly vs Harness

Compared 5% of the time

More Harness Competitors

Product Reports

Bamboo

Download Bamboo product report

Download Harness product report

Also Known As

No data available

Armory

Overview

Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

Atlassian

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

Bamboo vs. Harness