Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Group-IB Threat Intelligence and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable Group-IB Threat Intelligence features are their detections, especially in terms of account and card information leakage. This data sets Group-IB apart from some of the competition.""The tool's most valuable feature is the sandbox.""We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable.""Threat Intelligence's best feature is threat activation."

More Group-IB Threat Intelligence Pros →

"The most valuable feature is alerting.""I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats.""The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic.""The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

Cons
"Group-IB Threat Intelligence should improve integration for SIEM and SOAR solutions.""The web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions.""Threat Intelligence's OT security could be improved.""The lack of appliance-based or on-premise options for this solution is its biggest downfall. Clients request them often."

More Group-IB Threat Intelligence Cons →

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution.""I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Threat Intelligence is costly, but it gives value for money."
  • "Group-IB Threat Intelligence's pricing is reasonable."
  • More Group-IB Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is expensive."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable.
    Top Answer:The dark web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions.
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.
    Top Answer:The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.
    Ranking
    Views
    843
    Comparisons
    463
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    239
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    1,160
    Comparisons
    396
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence is an extremely potent threat intelligence platform that is trusted by everyone from law enforcement organizations like Interpol to the threat analysts that rely on it. It helps users gain a deep understanding of the threat landscape that they face. Organizations that choose to use Threat Intelligence gain insights into how threat actors think so that they can counter them as effectively as possible.

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Threat Hunting Framework include:

    • Increase efficiency. One of the things that Group-IB kept in mind when they designed Threat Intelligence was that organizations are always looking for ways to improve their digital security. Threat Intelligence does just that by increasing the efficiency of the security operations of businesses that deploy it. Users can automate parts of their security workflows. They can remove potential human error from the equation and at the same time allow resources to be assigned to areas where they are most needed. It can also reduce the number of false alarms that users have to worry about. This enables organizations to focus on events that actually threaten them instead of those that were incorrectly flagged.
    • Adaptability. Threat Intelligence enables users to adapt their security operations so that they can confront any security-based challenge. They can connect and integrate with many of the more popular security solutions to bolster their capabilities if their security needs change. Users are given the flexibility to add other solutions to their security architecture if the situation makes it necessary to do so. They can also use industry-specific intelligence to adjust their security protocols as the industry landscape changes. They can block harmful and malicious activity as soon as their system becomes aware of the issue.
    • Threat tracking. Users of Threat Intelligence are able to track threats across their specific industries or others that interest them. Bad actors who target particular types of businesses can be watched closely by those who would be most harmed by them. This keeps organizations aware of the nature of the threats that threaten them and their partners.

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence Features

    Some of the many features that Group-IB Threat Intelligence offers include:

    • Centralized customizable threat management dashboard. Threat Intelligence offers users the ability to create a centralized threat-tracking dashboard. From this single location, organizations can keep an eye on hackers and other threats. All of the data that could prove relevant to dealing with attacks can be accessed without any hassle.
    • Network traffic analysis. Organizations can leverage a tool that enables them to scan network traffic for threats that might otherwise go unnoticed. They can set it to look for particular patterns, sequences, or commands that might indicate the presence of malware.
    • Graph feature. Threat Intelligence makes it possible for users to upload information relating to various threat actors onto a graph. This represents the relationship between these actors in a visual way that can be easy for decision-makers to understand.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence is a solution that stands out even when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its ability to provide users with automated threat-hunting capabilities and its events and intelligence correlation feature.

    John R., the chief technology officer at Systema Global Solusindo, writes, “The solution allows clients to conduct Automated Threat Hunting which closes the gap between cybersecurity skills in the market and the high requirements of knowledge required to do such analysis.”

    He also says, “The most valuable feature is the automatic correlation of all internal cyber activities with their cyber threat intelligence. Threat Hunting Framework provides real-time correlation on all the cyber events and checks against the Group-IB Threat Intelligence database.”

    AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Group-IB Threat Intelligence is ranked 8th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews. Group-IB Threat Intelligence is rated 8.8, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Group-IB Threat Intelligence writes "Easy to setup, highly stable and scalable and efficiently tracks threat actors and analyze their tactics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". Group-IB Threat Intelligence is most compared with Recorded Future, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services, Mandiant Advantage and Anomali ThreatStream, whereas Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal, LogRhythm SIEM and Cisco Threat Grid. See our Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.