CrowdStrike Falcon vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.0. CrowdStrike holds a 6.1% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 136 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

49,300 Views
2,465 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews

1,287 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2025

CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus are competitive in cybersecurity. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus appears to have the upper hand with its advanced threat detection capabilities within the Palo Alto ecosystem.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon offers real-time threat intelligence, user-friendly incident response, and robust endpoint protection. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus delivers deep threat analytics, malware identification, and integration with the Palo Alto security network.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could benefit from enhancing advanced threat detection capabilities, deeper analytics integration, and expanding feature compatibility. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus might improve ease of deployment, expand third-party integration, and offer more flexible pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward, cloud-first deployment with strong vendor support. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus requires a more complex setup due to integration needs, but it is supported by comprehensive services within its dedicated security framework.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is offered at competitive pricing with scalable cloud deployment and substantial ROI. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, although priced higher, justifies the cost with significant threat intelligence returns and enhanced integration for existing Palo Alto users.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

136

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (1st), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

17th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 6.1%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CrowdStrike Falcon	6.1%
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	1.2%
Other	92.7%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Waleed Omar

Information Security Specialist at Arab Open University

Provides effective real-time threat detection with potential for cost optimization

Some features such as device control, firewall management, and file analysis are standalone products that we need to purchase separately. If these features came out of the box within the product, it would be much more beneficial for us. Other providers such as SentinelOne include these features in their base product. We attended a CrowdStrike Falcon event where they discussed some shallow AI features, but we cannot see these in our panel yet. We work with different solutions such as Darktrace and SocRadar, where AI features are automatically displayed in our dashboards after release. However, for CrowdStrike Falcon, we cannot see these features.

Read full review

Tejas Jain

Head Of Security Engineering Principle Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Seamless integration into existing ecosystem empowers effective threat detection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is its seamless integration into the Palo Alto Networks ecosystem, allowing the threat intelligence feeds to be automatically consumed without manual effort. It uses the STIX format, which is automatically understood by the firewalls. AutoFocus also excels in behavioral analytics and reputation scoring, providing thorough threat analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The detection and response console is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is the machine learning that they use to check certain patterns in the endpoint devices. It checks the whole ecosystem or entire environment."

"The solution has improved my organization by automating the detection and reporting of unwanted applications so we're aware of them and can respond appropriately."

"CrowdStrike is a great solution."

"The product's deployment phase is easy."

"Scalability hasn't been an issue for us."

"It has definitely minimized resources. When everything was on-prem, there was a lot more work maintaining it. One of the big value tickets: I don't have lists of hundreds of exceptions for certain applications that I have to maintain, add, delete, and move. The very nature of the product has lessened my workload considerably."

"One of the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon is when there are upgrades there are no additional fees."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."

"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."

Cons

"The solution could improve the policies themselves. It would be helpful if there were cost-cutting measures."

"The console is not user-friendly or visually appealing and has room for improvement."

"The new interface, the UI, seems a bit messy."

"The dashboard does not have the facility to export the reports in a PDF format, which I can quickly share with internal stakeholders."

"The UI is not efficient."

"I'm concerned about the recent issue that involved a faulty update."

"Basically, they don't cover legacy OS or applications. That's the only issue we're concerned about"

"To simplify the budgeting process for our clients, CrowdStrike should consider offering bundled packages that include essential features."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"We pay between $30-50 per user for a yearly license, which is more expensive than SentinelOne or Bitdefender. However, CrowdStrike gives better value for money."

"The solution's pricing is great for us."

"As I'm part of the technical team, not the budgeting team, I don't have information on CrowdStrike Falcon pricing."

"The pricing and licensing are fairly good. It is definitely not a cheap product, but I have felt that it is worth the money that we spent. So, we have discussed it in the past, and were like, "Yes, it is probably pricier than some other solutions, but we also feel they really are the leader. We are very comfortable with their level of expertise. So, it's kind of worth the price that we pay.""

"CrowdStrike Falcon's price is good."

"I would like them to further reduce the price, because it is quite pricey at the moment."

"CrowdStrike Falcon is one of the more expensive endpoint solutions on the market."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"It is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Performing Arts

15%

Insurance Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	62

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 23% of the time

Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 20% of the time

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

December 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

December 2025

Download Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CrowdStrike Falcon Platform

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint protection and threat detection, leveraging cloud-native architecture and AI-driven capabilities for advanced security. Its design ensures minimal system impact, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient protection solutions.

CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive security features, including endpoint detection and response, real-time threat insights, and advanced AI-driven detection mechanisms. Its cloud-native architecture facilitates effortless scalability and seamless integration with cloud services, securing endpoints, servers, and roaming users. While Falcon delivers strong threat intelligence and automated detection, it faces challenges in operating system compatibility, reports require enhancements, and integration with some technologies is limited. High pricing and occasional false positives are noted areas for improvement, along with expanded support for older systems.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Endpoint Detection and Response: Offers real-time threat tracking and quick reaction capabilities.
AI-Driven Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning for identifying sophisticated threats.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Ensures seamless scalability and integration with cloud platforms.
Lightweight Design: Minimizes impact on system performance for efficient operation.
Remote Access and Isolation: Facilitates remote endpoint management and network protection.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Comprehensive Dashboards: Provides detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Scalability: Handles expansion effortlessly as organizational needs grow.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security strategies with robust data.
Reduced Resource Consumption: Operates efficiently, saving on system resources.

In industries requiring fortified cybersecurity measures, CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed for endpoint protection and incident response. It offers advanced threat defense and integrates well with cloud services, making it a suitable replacement for traditional antivirus solutions. For sectors engaging in forensic investigations and real-time malware defense, Falcon's capabilities align with their security demands, serving industries from healthcare to finance.

CrowdStrike

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.