Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Grafana Labs and Zenoss are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Grafana Labs is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2, while Zenoss is ranked #53. Grafana Labs holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Zenoss’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.
Grafana Enterprise Stack
Read 9 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews
  • 692 Views
  • 501 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Zenoss Cloud
Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews
  • 704 Views
  • 492 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in cloud monitoring and analytics. Grafana Enterprise Stack has an upper hand due to its advanced visualization capabilities and extensibility, appealing to organizations focusing on visual data representation.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers valuable features like real-time analytics, dynamic thresholding, and root cause analysis, ideal for businesses focused on infrastructure monitoring. Grafana Enterprise Stack features extensive customization options, powerful dashboards, and support for various data sources, making it suitable for complex data visualizations.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could improve its flexibility, data visualization options, and integration capabilities. Grafana Enterprise Stack might enhance its deployment simplicity, ease of use for non-technical users, and reduce initial configuration complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud offers a streamlined deployment process for cloud environments, backed by proactive customer service. Grafana Enterprise Stack requires a more intricate deployment due to extensive configuration options but provides detailed guidance and robust support.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud has a significant setup cost but promises strong ROI through comprehensive monitoring solutions. Grafana Enterprise Stack, though initially expensive, justifies its price with flexibility and potential to deliver detailed insights through exceptional data visualization and configurability.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Zenoss Cloud
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
25th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zenoss Cloud
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
53rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (33rd), Event Monitoring (14th), Network Monitoring Software (76th), Server Monitoring (23rd), Container Monitoring (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th), AIOps (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Gregory Diana - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers very good charting capabilities and capable of automatically generating dashboards, even for a large number of data points
In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party. It's like Node-RED. Node-RED is free, and you can choose an application, but that application depends on the person who's supporting it. If they decide not to support it, then you're stuck. However, I believe that it can't be improved or changed because people have to make money and make a living from it. Nothing will ever be changed. It depends on the software. Same as Windward. Windward just decided it could not support a large number of customers, so it focused on high-income, low-volume clients. Whereas Node-RED has millions of followers and fantastic support, the same as Grafana. Grafana is partly free, but it's your problem. That's how all these companies work. If you're big and you pay a lot of money, they'll pay attention to you.
Read full review
ClaudiaChen - PeerSpot reviewer
Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features
As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues."
"The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."
"Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources."
"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."
"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."
"The dashboards are pretty good."
"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."
More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros
"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."
"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."
"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."
"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."
"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."
"It's easy to use."
"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."
 

Cons

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."
"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."
"The solution should include integration with Power BI."
"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."
"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."
"I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana."
"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."
"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."
More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons
"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."
"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."
"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."
"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."
"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."
"The AI aspect needs to improve."
"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."
"It depends on the customer, what he wants."
"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."
"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Computer Software Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?
The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?
From an analytics perspective, the integration of AI would be a beneficial improvement for Grafana Enterprise Stack.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?
Our primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack includes monitoring cluster utilization, taking care of impact avoidance, conducting upgrades, ensuring storage memory does not become full, and id...
See all answers
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 36% of the time
OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 18% of the time
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 12% of the time
Cisco Intersight vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
Cisco Intersight vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 9% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs Grafana Enterprise Stack Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs Grafana Enterprise Stack
Compared 7% of the time
More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 38% of the time
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 35% of the time
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 15% of the time
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 12% of the time
More Zenoss Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Grafana Enterprise Stack
April 2025
Grafana Enterprise Stack reportDownload Grafana Enterprise Stack product report
Buyer's Guide
Zenoss Cloud
April 2025
Zenoss Cloud reportDownload Zenoss Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics
 

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications. 

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs
Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.
Zenoss
 

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell
2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Zenoss Cloud
April 2025
Free Report: Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Zenoss Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Zenoss Cloud report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.