Google Kubernetes Engine vs Komodor comparison

Read 5 Komodor reviews

1,244 Views
1,244 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Kubernetes Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

In the Kubernetes ecosystem, Google Kubernetes Engine and Komodor offer unique solutions. Google Kubernetes Engine stands out for its scalability and integration within Google Cloud, providing a robust infrastructure. Komodor, meanwhile, focuses on enhancing efficiency with observability tools, excellent for troubleshooting.

Features: Google Kubernetes Engine provides integrated management and orchestration like auto-scaling, multi-cluster support, and comprehensive cloud application management. Komodor offers diagnostic tools including incident timelines, root cause analysis, and an intuitive interface geared towards enhancing operational efficiency in Kubernetes environments.

Room for Improvement: Google Kubernetes Engine could improve its customer service response times and simplify the complexities tied to extensive integrations. Additionally, enhancing cost efficiency for resource-heavy operations could be advantageous. Komodor may need better integration with non-Kubernetes ecosystems, expanded documentation for wider user adoption, and improved scalability for handling larger enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Kubernetes Engine ensures easy deployment with solid support for enterprises familiar with Google Cloud Platform, although service may be slower due to scale. Komodor offers rapid setup, easing onboarding with a user-friendly interface, and provides personalized, hands-on customer service that benefits newcomers to Kubernetes.

Pricing and ROI: Google Kubernetes Engine's pricing is usage-based, which can increase with higher resource consumption, but offers a comprehensive feature set. Komodor's competitive pricing is focused on value through specialized monitoring, potentially offering better ROI for organizations prioritizing operational efficiency and reduced downtime.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Komodor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Komodor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Kubernetes Engine

Ranking in Container Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Google Kubernetes Engine is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Komodor is 4.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Parthasarathy T

Cloud Associate DevOps at Publicis Sapient

Managed solutions enable efficient handling of web applications and migration projects

Google Kubernetes Engine can be improved by enabling the in-place upgrade of the machine type of an existing node pool since I currently need to destroy and recreate it. There is no feature present where I can upgrade directly, and having more than 1,000 to 2,000 workloads in one node pool makes changing the node pool name difficult for all those workloads. I choose eight out of ten mainly because of the node pool upgrade challenge I mentioned, but also because of the existence of Anthos service mesh, which is the ingress controller available only for the enterprise Kubernetes Engine. It would be beneficial if it could be offered in the normal Kubernetes Engine with any limitations.

Read full review

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources. I am looking forward to using AI-powered troubleshooting workflow that Komodor unrolled recently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup process is simpler and more user-friendly than other cloud providers."

"Its functionalities, such as computing the namespaces, clusters, pods, and restart logs, are easy to use."

"The logs are important for detecting problems in our clusters."

"The product has no downtime."

"The product has valuable security features. It can connect with multiple DevOps tools."

"The feature that I like the most is the ease of use as compared to AWS. Its ease of use is very high, and I can quickly deploy clusters with a simple template."

"We hardly have a breakdown. It's been very stable."

"I rate Google Kubernetes Engine a ten out of ten."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pros

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

Cons

"The management UI could be improved."

"The pricing could be more competitive. It should be cheaper."

"The user interface could be improved."

"The product’s visible allocation feature needs improvement."

"Our critique is that we have to do too much work to get the cluster production-ready."

"There is a limitation for our infrastructure. It's very complex to see in one dashboard all the components and all the behavior on performance. I am looking for some additional tools for that. If I want to check the disk or file storage, it gets complex. There should be an integrated dashboard so that we can manage everything through a single pane."

"t is not very stable."

"The solution does not have a visual interface."

More Google Kubernetes Engine cons

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, it costs around $1000 per month which sorted our deployment. So once we get more clients, having a huge suffix, costs can go up."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"Initially, Google Kubernetes Engine was a little bit cheaper, but now its prices have been increased compared to the pricing model and the features that are made available by its competitors."

"Pricing is a bit expensive compared to some other products, but it's acceptable."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten. The tool costs around 3000 dollars per month. There are no additional costs apart from these."

"Its pricing is good. They bill us only per user. That's nice."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pricing and cost advice

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Wellness & Fitness Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Kubernetes Engine?

The product has no downtime.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Kubernetes Engine?

Google Kubernetes Engine solution is expensive, as are all cloud solutions in general. On a scale of one to ten for pricing, I would rate it between seven and eight.

What needs improvement with Google Kubernetes Engine?

I have no comment about the learning curve of Google Kubernetes Engine. Regarding AI integration and features in Google Kubernetes Engine, there are currently none available. I would appreciate see...

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

What needs improvement with Komodor?

What is your primary use case for Komodor?

We are an HR analytics company, and we do a lot of data processing. Our customers send us their HR-related data, and we process it so that we can run analytics on it. We process it on Kubernetes cl...

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 14% of the time

Docker vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 12% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 11% of the time

More Google Kubernetes Engine Competitors

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 79% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 13% of the time

Kubernetes vs Komodor

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor

Compared 3% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

Product Reports

Download Google Kubernetes Engine product report

Google Kubernetes Engine

August 2025

Download Komodor product report

August 2025

Also Known As

GKE

No data available

Overview

Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.

Google

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Sample Customers

Philips Lighting, Alpha Vertex, GroupBy, BQ

Information Not Available