

Logpoint and Google Chronicle Suite compete in the cybersecurity sector. Google Chronicle Suite has the upper hand due to its advanced features and seamless integration.
Features: Logpoint is known for cost-effectiveness, efficient threat detection, and robust support. Google Chronicle Suite excels in advanced data analytics, seamless integration with Google Cloud, and comprehensive security capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Logpoint needs better scalability, more third-party integrations, and enhanced documentation. Google Chronicle Suite requires improved alert responsiveness, better user documentation, and enhanced customer guidance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint has a straightforward deployment process with responsive support. Google Chronicle Suite's deployment can be complex, but its customer support is highly rated for problem resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Logpoint is attractive due to its lower initial setup costs and favorable ROI. Google Chronicle Suite, while more expensive, offers higher long-term value due to its comprehensive features.
We are a critical project for them at this moment, and they provide excellent service.
They are slow, and the initial responses often require more information rather than providing helpful solutions.
I have faced challenges with technical support from Sentinel, though Sentinel support is better than Google's, while Splunk support is also not that great.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
I rate the scalability of Google Chronicle Suite as ten out of ten.
Google Chronicle Suite is very scalable, being a cloud-based solution.
In the cloud-native space, the problem is that if you require additional devices, you might have to work on custom applications.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
I rate the stability of Google Chronicle Suite as a nine, as I have not encountered any stability issues.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
The graphical user interface could be improved to enhance user experience.
The UI is the primary challenge in need of improvement.
Google Chronicle Suite lacks near time detection.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
It's neither expensive nor cheap, and I believe it is a justified price for the features offered.
Compared to a SIEM like Microsoft Sentinel, it is much more affordable.
I experience Chronicle as less expensive and less complicated than Azure.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
They also combine their source solution into one product, allowing for out-of-the-box playbook creation and incident response.
The AI infused into the platform helps in investigations and rule creation.
The automated response feature allows for immediate actions like isolating infected machines or blocking malicious IP addresses.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Chronicle Suite | 1.2% |
| Logpoint | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.
Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.
What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.
Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.
Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.
What are the most important features of Logpoint?Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.