We performed a comparison between GoodAccess and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Their user interface is intuitive as it is easy to navigate."
"The VPN's role in facilitating remote work has improved internal efficiency."
"The task of managing security and auditing for unauthorized entries has been substantially diminished."
"The dashboard is pretty sleek and complete."
"The solution has easy-to-use administration and offers an easy implementation."
"GoodAccess has significantly improved security in our organization."
"GoodAccess offers a very available professional support service - it can be via chat service, email, or phone."
"It has become an integral part of our remote work toolkit, as it enables us to overcome USA IP restrictions, ensuring our global teams can collaborate effectively."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The installable app's occasional bugs have caused disruptions for some users, impacting smooth usage."
"The interface information could show more information about how threats have occurred. Right now, it only shows basic threat information."
"Their recent revision in pricing was a jolt. Though any business understands the need for periodic pricing evaluations, a clearer communication strategy and more gradual changes might have been more palatable for long-term clients like us."
"They need to provide a more comprehensive app that shows more data that appears on the GoodAccess site."
"The logs do not go back very far."
"The latest upgrade to the Windows version of the app (unconfirmed on the Mac client) adds some unnecessary stylized animation to the GUI."
"There could be a better view of which type of communication is going through the system."
"There is one minor drawback to mention: occasionally, the Internet connection tends to slow down noticeably while using the VPN."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
Earn 20 points
GoodAccess is ranked 10th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. GoodAccess is rated 9.2, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of GoodAccess writes "Robust, allows for remote work, and has comprehensive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". GoodAccess is most compared with , whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors and best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
