Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs GoodAccess comparison

Read 20 GoodAccess reviews

566 Views
328 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Cisco IOS SSL VPN and GoodAccess are both competing for prominence in secure remote access solutions. GoodAccess seems to have the upper hand based on user reviews for ease of use and simplicity.

Features: Users highlight extensive security capabilities, robust integration options, and detailed configurations in Cisco IOS SSL VPN. GoodAccess is praised for ease of use, simplicity, and user-friendly design, particularly beneficial for smaller teams or those without dedicated IT support.

Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS SSL VPN users report needing improvements in setup complexity, ongoing management, and overall usability. GoodAccess users highlight the need for more advanced security features, enhanced integration options, and a more comprehensive feature set for advanced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS SSL VPN users find deployment complex, requiring significant IT expertise, but customer support is rated highly. GoodAccess is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, standing out for teams needing quick set-up without deep technical knowledge.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS SSL VPN is reported to have higher setup costs but delivers robust long-term ROI, making it ideal for enterprises that can justify the initial investment. GoodAccess is seen as more cost-effective initially with quicker returns, especially for smaller organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. GoodAccess Report (Updated: July 2025).

Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. GoodAccess

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SSL VPN (3rd)

GoodAccess

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

8th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (5th), ZTNA (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Cisco IOS SSL VPN is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoodAccess is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

Rupesh Kolhapurkar

Manager at Reliance Industries Ltd

Offers easy setup phase but needs to improve connectivity

For our company's remote workforce connectivity, the tool was very useful during the COVID-19 situation. In general, the VPN functionality offered by the product was very useful during the COVID-19 situation. In terms of the product's ability to secure third-party access, the tool works very well. The most valuable feature of the product in terms of network security stems from the fact that the tool provides access to the whole network, and even if users give access to some special applications, it is still really helpful. The clientless access feature is not available for clients. My company installed the product for its clients. If the product offers a clientless access feature, then it is okay and can be very helpful for our company. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is a reliable product. The product is very helpful for a work-from-home setup as the tool can be used to access our company's internal network, which Falls outside the network of our organization. I rate the tool a seven to eight out of ten.

Read full review

Itai Rieur

Email Marketing Manager at eTeacher

A stable service with good support and little downtime

The best aspects of GoodAccess include: 1. Support system (available 24/7, quick to respond, and highly knowledgeable). GoodAccess offers a very available professional support service - it can be via chat service, email, or phone. The relevant representative was very professional, and responsive questions were answered in a prompt manner. 2. Stable service. Since we rely daily on a VPN to connect with multiple connections, VPN stability is crucial to us. in that sense, GoodAccess never fails. In the two or more years we have been using this service, there have been only one or two downtimes. each for 20 minutes or less. That's impressive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IOS is user-friendly and simple. You connect to a particular VPN, and that's it. You become seamless after that."

"I have found that Cisco IOS SSL VPN is stable."

"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is very stable. We never experience issues with it."

"A reliable and stable solution for remote network access."

"It is very effective and I am satisfied with how it works and with its performance."

"The user interface is user-friendly."

"It is highly scalable, speedy, and reliable."

"The solution is very reliable."

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN pros

"GoodAccess has significantly improved security in our organization."

"The solution's robustness has meant that our team, regardless of where they're located, feels as though they're working right from the office, having secure and quick access to all essential tools."

"GoodAccess was the only hosted VPN solution we found for a reasonable cost that allowed us to establish a site-to-site VPN network for hundreds of locations across the country."

"GoodAccess VPN has brought a transformative shift to our organization, notably enhancing collaboration and enabling seamless remote work."

"This simple, stable, affordable VPN solution scaled with us over the first year of use, allowing for an expansion of remote/hybrid workers to remotely access key systems otherwise restricted to our internal office network."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the static IP and speed."

"Their user interface is intuitive as it is easy to navigate."

"No extra hardware is needed, and it is very easy to set up"

More GoodAccess pros

Cons

"Cisco IOS SSL VPN should improve its pricing."

"The flexibility of configurations could be improved."

"I think the administration can be improved to include web interfaces."

"I have no notes in terms of areas of improvement."

"Improvements could be made in terms of connectivity for applications."

"Enhancing the client certificate deployment process could be a valuable improvement, ensuring smoother and more reliable certificate renewal experiences in the future."

"The configuration must be improved."

"Cisco device management is quite difficult. They should work to simplify this."

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN cons

"The latest upgrade to the Windows version of the app (unconfirmed on the Mac client) adds some unnecessary stylized animation to the GUI."

"There could be a better view of which type of communication is going through the system."

"For small organizations, it works great. However, the larger the organization, the more scalable the pricing model, the better, since gateways can be very expensive if an organization needs multiple gateways."

"The product could improve by extending its chat support beyond 8-5 CET, Monday to Friday, to a 24/7 service for better accessibility and immediate assistance."

"The price tier is not suited for small teams."

"It is worth mentioning that we do experience disconnects on rare occasions."

"The interface could provide more extensive information regarding the occurrence of threats. Currently, it only displays rudimentary threat data."

"The logs do not go back very far."

More GoodAccess cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FortiGate does not charge the client a licensing fee, although Cisco charges clients a couple of dollars per year for each license."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Cisco IOS SSL VPN."

"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is more expensive than the Aruba VPN, but it is worth the money."

"The product costs less."

"The licensing cost of the solution is on a yearly basis, and it is expensive compared to other solutions in the market."

"I would say it is a bit expensive, but I think it is worth the price."

"The tool is expensive."

"Price flexibility could be improved in comparison to other vendors."

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco IOS SSL VPN?

The solution is pretty fast.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco IOS SSL VPN?

The pricing for Cisco IOS SSL VPN is based on per user. For more than one hundred users, it costs about $60 per seat.

What needs improvement with Cisco IOS SSL VPN?

It's hard for me to say how Linksys could be improved. I can't think of any specific improvements needed. I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier m...

What do you like most about GoodAccess?

GoodAccess offers a very available professional support service - it can be via chat service, email, or phone.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoodAccess?

Test multiple providers' solutions for speed and connection before signing up for service. Also, test the help desk response time, as this will be very important when you run into issues. The setup...

What needs improvement with GoodAccess?

We are having a problem with accessing Microsoft Copilot while connected. GoodAccess is working on the issue, but fixing this will be a help to us. There is nothing else at the moment that we need ...

OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Comparisons

Compared 33% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 22% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 20% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN

Compared 10% of the time

More Cisco IOS SSL VPN Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Download Cisco IOS SSL VPN product report

Cisco IOS SSL VPN

August 2025

Download GoodAccess product report

August 2025

Also Known As

Cisco SSL VPN

No data available

Overview

Cisco SSL VPN solutions help you easily and securely extend the network to users who have access to the Internet and a web browser. You can customize access and extend the reach of your corporate network to individuals based on their roles, including teleworker contractors and business partners.

Cisco

GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform designed for medium-sized enterprises to implement Zero Trust Architecture efficiently, offering a rapid, hardware-free deployment that integrates smoothly with existing infrastructures.

GoodAccess provides organizations a powerful means to secure their networks through a scalable zero-trust cybersecurity platform. It supports remote and hybrid work environments by protecting critical assets and enabling seamless connectivity. This platform ensures robust security, facilitating compliance with the latest standards while integrating with SaaS and legacy systems. Businesses with 50 to 5000 employees across several industries benefit from its advanced capabilities, which include device security, multi-factor authentication, and identity-based access control.

What are the key features of GoodAccess?

Remote Access and BYOD: Ensures device security through inventory checks.
Multi-factor Authentication: Provides unified MFA for all critical systems.
Identity-Based Access Control: Enables zero-trust access control by identity.
Network Encryption and Segmentation: Reduces attack surface via granular segmentation.
Full Control and Visibility: Integrates with SIEM for comprehensive security logs.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Easy Integration: Seamless with existing systems, enhancing operational efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quickly deploys, improving time to protection.
Improved Security: Superior security with high-speed, flexible remote access.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust protection at a manageable cost.
Comprehensive Support: Reliable service supporting diverse environments.

GoodAccess is widely implemented across industries needing secure, adaptable connectivity. It is ideal for sectors prioritizing remote and hybrid workforces, like tech and professional services, ensuring seamless access and compliance with complex regulatory requirements. Companies benefit from its application in controlling geolocation requirements, facilitating secure video conferencing, and ensuring high-speed access regardless of location.

Sample Customers

MST Systems

Information Not Available