Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GEP SMART vs SAP Ariba Procurement comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GEP SMART
Ranking in Procurement Software
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Contract Management Software (14th)
SAP Ariba Procurement
Ranking in Procurement Software
1st
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Procurement Software category, the mindshare of GEP SMART is 6.9%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Ariba Procurement is 25.7%, up from 25.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Procurement Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Ariba Procurement25.7%
GEP SMART6.9%
Other67.4%
Procurement Software
 

Featured Reviews

CJ
Doesn't require a background in analytics to run reports
SMART has been helpful for sourcing and public bids. For regulatory purposes, our university posts bids, depending on the scope of the bid. We get a lot of value out of SMART's ability to post to a public site and have suppliers see that information, register in the tool, and participate. SMART features for collecting information and its timeline capabilities are highly useful. Then on the contract side, the reporting capabilities are the most valuable. Our use case focuses primarily on post-execution and lifecycle management, so it's essential to be able to report accurately especially compliance-related reports. SMART is easy to use, especially when reporting. It isn't designed for a hardcore analyst. You don't need to have a background in analytics to run reports, which is huge. I realized I hadn't touched too much on the spending side, but we use SMART for all spending analytics, and any commodity manager procurement professional can go in and run a spending report. That was a business decision to restrict who can run reports since that data can be exported and used. But the reporting capabilities are incredibly easy to use.
Rajender Agnihotri - PeerSpot reviewer
Has maintained procurement transparency and improved supplier relationships through automated processes
For me, the most valuable feature of SAP Ariba Procurement is reverse auction, which helps us with price discovery in the market. After analyzing the quotes we have from suppliers, we found that many times there's a big gap in the rate we are paying and the benchmarking rate that is there in the market. The use of SAP Ariba Procurement platform for dynamic price bidding has been one of the best solutions that have been used by us. We use SAP Ariba Procurement's data analytics feature. It mostly helps us with slicing and dicing of the data, making the spend analysis more customer-friendly. That helps us to make decisions on the different contracts that can be simplified and that can be easily used for giving us the best cost and the best service to be provided, and also integration of service levels in that. The spend analytics platform gives us visibility on the way spend is organized among different categories, different regions, and different subcategories. It shows how we can consolidate buying in certain cases, and in addition to that, how we can leverage our spend data so that cost savings can be utilized and we can maximize the benefits that have been offered as part of the analytics solution. SAP Ariba Procurement has impacted my organization in many important ways that have been prolonged benefits. The top three benefits I see are that there has been a lot of trust in suppliers post this implementation. It builds transparency in the system. Supplier key performance indicators, those which are evaluated through the supplier scorecard, are easily and readily available and visible in the system. The supplier and the customer are quite aware of the way supplier performance is moving over the period of time. It has also helped us to bring many cost-saving opportunities that have led to actual deliverable savings of 5% to 8% for us. Supplier performance has also improved over a period of time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"SMART has been helpful for sourcing and public bids. For regulatory purposes, our university posts bids, depending on the scope of the bid. We get a lot of value out of SMART's ability to post to a public site and have suppliers see that information, register in the tool, and participate."
"The one we use the most is the sourcing module... It's really easy to use. You don't have to train vendors. You can add a new vendor at any time, and that vendor will get an email saying, "You've been selected to participate in our RFP, and you do X to get your ID set up." That works really well."
"One of the most valuable features is the opportunity-identification through the spend analytics. Another is around the RFX options to benchmark various pre-qualified vendors that are invited to participate."
"The most valuable features are the sourcing and tendering processes."
"The AI tool definitely has learned from the information we've given it but also from some of the corrections that we've made. It may have auto-applied a classification and then we have gone in and corrected it, given it some feedback. With that, more and more, we are not having to touch the information once it gets processed. It's classifying it from the get-go in the correct category."
"The biggest selling point for us was having the contracts repository centralized for both systems. People are able to search for a contract. Typically, before they go out to bid or engage with a supplier, procurement folks come into GEP SMART and they search for a contract and check to see if there is an existing contract in place."
"Spend gives us a way to put all of our spend in one area and use a category hierarchy to pull real-time spend data."
"There are additional time savings in managing communications. If you have an open RFP and there are questions, you can manage all of the questions and answers in the thread inside that RFP. All the suppliers will get any notifications that you want them to get, and everything is within the body of the RFP so you don't have to worry about things in email, outside of the system."
"Ariba allows us to manage our suppliers seamlessly."
"The best features are the ease of use and the workflow management that allows me to understand every step in the approval process so that I can forecast the time through my request and its approval."
"Salesforce provides me with the ability to create reports based on various parameters."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is one of the best tools in the market."
"I like the guided buying features."
 

Cons

"Their contracts module is kind of clunky and It took a while for them to correct some of the basic functionality, some of the "Contract Management 101" functions, but it seems to be coming around. It wasn't working the way we'd expected."
"I want to see continued investment in analytics and reporting."
"While it captures all the fields and requirements, when any supplier updates or new supplier registration happens, then the supplier needs to update their bank details. Our IT team has made it so every half an hour the GEP SMART system will push the supplier to the Oracle Database. So, we have faced some problems, like bank details, etc. We addressed this issue with GEP. They are working on it to make bank details a mandatory field for any supplier and match our requirements. Their engineering team has taken up creating a customized process for us."
"We had a lot of challenges and disagreements with SMART. It's been a long road, for sure, on the contract side. There is a little bit of pushback on their part when we need stuff done. Things aren't done very efficiently. I'm still waiting on some changes that were requested well over a year-and-a-half ago."
"The loading of the contracts could be a little bit easier. I'd like to see a little bit more of AI brought in, to the point that it's actually reading the contract and automating some things, like expiration dates and renewal terms. That is an area for improvement."
"We definitely have some asks for enhancements. One of the big ones we'd like to see is what we call "drag-and-drop." If I have an email that I want to maintain in the SMART record for whatever reason — for example, it has supporting information in it — I would love to be able to just drop that into the notes and attachments section without having to save it as a PDF and then upload it."
"Very recently, they implemented a customer success team to manage our expectations and communicate them to their technical team. That function is relatively new and some work needs to be done to build that connection so that it's a little more seamless."
"I'd like to see drag-and-drop reporting. They have the old model for reports where you have to click the "run" button. The thing runs and then you have to export it to PowerPoint."
"They should make the solution more user-friendly."
"Salesforce is expensive, with a subscription-based model."
"Ariba Procurement tends to integrate best with other SAP products and is harder to work with if you have non-SAP products in your architecture."
"SAP could make it easier for people to become SAP Ariba consultants within the SAP ecosystem."
"I would like the solution to be more automatic."
"I would like to see more reports coming out of Ariba and more insights because it has to work in connection with SAP. So unless I run SAP and Ariba, I have to run. I am not able to see the utility of Ariba."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If our organization could use it as a full-fledged solution, then it would be valuable and give a return on investment. However, since we are not currently using it as a full-fledged solution, even facing some bugs and problems with the synchronization with some of the internal software, we are not able to use it in a full-fledged manner."
"My advice is to think wisely when it comes to estimating the number of licenses that you will require. If you settle on a number too early and you need additional ones, then the extra licenses might be quite expensive."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The license is expensive."
"The licensing cost depends on the customer."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Procurement Software solutions are best for your needs.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with SAP Ariba Procurement?
Salesforce is expensive, with a subscription-based model. This poses challenges for small and medium enterprises due to the high costs of the cloud offering. There is a need for varying pricing bas...
What is your primary use case for SAP Ariba Procurement?
The primary use case of Salesforce is in the B2B space. I use it to capture, analyze, summarize, and record customer database and information. It is the de facto standard in the industry for such p...
 

Also Known As

SMART by GEP
Ariba Procurement
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Exxon Chevron Macys
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)
Find out what your peers are saying about GEP SMART vs. SAP Ariba Procurement and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.