We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"The fact that the repository is available on the web is the most valuable feature. It's a very simple tool. If you can use something simple and visual, you should be able to use the model as well in Signavio. It has the ability, for example, to track versioning control, so if you make updates to the processes, you have the ability to track the versions as well."
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"The most valuable feature is probably the nature of it."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."
"This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement."
"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."
"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."
"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The price can be made cheaper."
"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."
"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."
"Signavio Process Manager needs to have an integrated document management system to better work with processes that rely heavily on documents and document flows."
"The licensing model could be better."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Signavio already offers a wonderful range of functions. If variant management and customer journeys are optimized, Signavio can definitely bask in the glory of BPM tools. We also see optimization potential in the management of licenses, e.g. no named users but rather floating licenses and integration into the company's active directory."
"There are a lot of challenges with Process Manager. For example, we wanted to create a process map from an Excel sheet, but Signavio doesn't have that capability. I have raised this issue with Signavio support, but it is one of the bottlenecks we are currently facing."
Earn 20 points
Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM) while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
